Fox News Promoting Eugenics/forced sterilization

You are an ideologue. Simple as that. Real politick has proven time and time again that intra-national multiculturalism DOES NOT and WILL NOT WORK. You think it will. You are high on crack. Only European derived people can continue European derived culture. Yes you do say lots against whites by advocating for their demographic disenfranchisement in their lands. This is racism. This is endorsement of genocide and ethnic cleansing. Who's the nazi now? Yes. You DEFINITELY are a RACIST. No doubt in my mind.

You hate international diversity because you want all the unique races on the planet to blend. That's not biodiversity at all. Moreover, 99% of the people on the planet simply will not do it. You think the Chinese would be happy to swap half a billion people with India? Do you? Of course, you do you brainwashed tool of the elite LOL!. The Chinese wouldnt. They are aware of who is or isnt Chinese.

Africa nationalist rock
Asian nationalists rock
European nationalists rock
Peace and success to them all in the countries they built!

 

Which of these do i subscribe to?

and again, i didn't call you a nazi, i called you a neo-nazi.

 

When did i ever say that?

I don't care if they blend or don't.

It doesn't matter to me either way.

When did i do that?

500 years from now lets say the U.S.A is 100% white, i don't care
100% hispanic, i dont care
100% black, i dont care

why?

because i could give 2 fucks about which race is predominate.
I don't bend myself prostrate over racial identity, i don't need to, i have my own identity.

 

These are loaded and politically marxist definitions. Politically subversive white guilt inducing propoganda. The only proper definition for the term racism is hating another SIMPLY for being of another race. Intelligence of a particular race etc does not even come to play. Separatism prevents Supremacism since groups are separated and cannot project political/economic authority over others. For example: take a look at Africa, it is prosperous due to the fact that there is no white supremacism there. Africans use their own innate talents to build advanced civlizations reflective of their cognitive abilities. White people are not there to hold them down. Now isnt that nice...

 

When you suggest that white Europeans should not interfere with efforts by non-Europeans to infest their lands, you are in fact endorsing demographic genocide. You are endorsing self determination of invaders but savaging efforts at self preservation by European peoples. That is endorsement of genocide. And you are very disengenous with what you wrote below. If you had no problem with America being 100% white, you would have no problem with anything I write. You sound silly.

 

When have i shown hatred toward anyone for being of another race?
And where are you getting that definition from?

 

In other words the term is a tool to promote nationalism. like manifest destiny.
it has no real objective meaning, especially to an anarchist.

I have no problem with america becoming 100% white, i do have a problem with anyone saying that america should or has to become 100% white.

 

unless of course the act of seperating those groups is rooted in supremacist mind set. supremacism isnt just the domination of one group over the other but the idea that one group is inherently "better" or superior to another. That's why they call it "Racial Supremacism" instead of just "Racial Domination".

reflective of their cognitive abilities....

care to elaborate?

And yes, white people ARE there holding them down.
Oil and Diamonds, my friend....

 

Definition 6, urban dictionary for the word "racism"

 

Let me save everybody some time and trouble.


topolm is linking: "bad" parenting, eugenics, intelligence as inheretable(which hasnt been proven), minorities taking advantage of the welfare state, whites having a higher I.Q. than others by genetic predisposition(again hasn't been proven), the lack of "civilization in sub-saharan africa(bold face lie), dysgenics, and the social problems of america....

Anyone else see where this is going?

Nothing new.

White man make society, good, black man enter white man society, not so good increase crime, hispanics enter white man society, bad take jobs, end result, white man stupid jobless and victim, all thanks to "multiculturalism"....

give me a fucking break.

 

There are 51 definitions in the urban dictionary for "racism", and only definition#6 is correct?

Says who?

 

Of course not and you know it. Social/economic and politial segregation merely leads to the development of homogenous nations which are most stable. Racial supremacism is racial domination when the dominant race is demographically a minority yet holds the economic and political power.

By definition, there is no such thing as white supremacism in America since it is a predominantly white country and whites have no obligation to bend over backswards to outsiders. These outsiders are GUESTS and ARE NOT Americans. These GUESTS are rabidly trying to redefine what America is and what it means to be American. This effort is known as "multiculturalism". America is a white european nation. Americans never agreed to the 1965 immigration control act that actively sought to disenfranchise them from the nation they built.

Non-white minorities will accept that they are guests and are outsiders and are free to leave at any time back to their 3rd world countries. At present, a system of minority supremacism exists whereby minorities make economic/political DEMANDS of whites and they are currently getting away with it. Minorities know they CANNOT survive without the economic generosity of whites and have been seeking for some time to define efforts at white liberation from minority tyrrany as inherently "white supremacist or racist".

Do you think minorities can survive and thrive in a successful advanced civlization without white European American good will? Look at Mexico... Mexico is 3rd world country because it is full of Mexicans. If America becomes predominantly Mexican, America will become a 3rd world country. Do you dispute this? White Europeans, wherever they live on the planet create very particular, comfortable and desirable societies that all people of the 3rld world ARE DESPERATE to live in. They will die trying to get into White European nations. Once they get in, they start complaining about racism etc etc etc. No one asked for them to come. No one is stopping them from leaving.

Let us all look into Shane's dark mind. Its scary, I promise:

I Shane believe all whites are guilty of past colonial transgressions. I will ignore the fact that under white colonial rule African countries prospered. I will ignore the fact that South Africa's black population is not native to the territory of South Africa and simply walked into S.Africa to benefit from white European economic success. I will ignore the fact that Africa's most successful nation was built by white Europeans. I will ignore the fact that black crime rates in S.Africa have EXPLODED since Apartheid fell, and that many of its cities are fast collapsing due to black incompetence. I prefer to neatly explain this phenomena away by blaming it on "the legacy of apartheid". I call this destruction progress... I like "doublespeak". I will ignore the reality that S.Africa WILL be a 3rd world dump after white Europeans leave for good, much in the same way Zimbabwe is now a 3rd world dump when white Europeans were forced out. I call this progress and it is good.

I blame whites for holding africa down, even though most blacks prospered under colonialism. I will neatly ignore the fact that Asian countries that were colonized by Europeans were given the tools to develop their own technologically advanced societies. I will ignore the fact that Asians have high IQ's on avg around 104 whereas subsaharan africans have IQ's of 70. The relative economic development between Asian and African countries has NOTHING to do with intelligence. I will ignore the fact that Asian countries also have a colonial legacy as do african countries, but let's ignore this detail. People might notice. LET'S IGNORE it. Nothing to see here.

I will ignore the fact that Cortez, a white spaniard liberated the Aztec people from a tyrannical Aztec elite that practiced human sacrifices. I will skip over the fact that Europeans created essentially every useful technology and industry. I will ignore the fact that Arabs were enslaving negroes before white Europeans and do so to this day. I will ignore that fact that the Ottoman Empire enslaved millions of White Europeans. I will ignore the fact the Mongol Golden Horde enslaved millions of white European people in the 13th and 14th centuries.

I will ignore the fact that Africans WERE selling their own kind into bondage to Arabs, Europeans and to other Africans. I will ignore the fact that in America, less than 3% of whites owned slaves, and over 25% of freed blacks owned black slaves. I will blame 97% for something they never did and endorse subversive programs that will destroy european civilization. I will ignore the fact that only 4000 blacks were lynched but blacks have literally committed tens of millions of violent crimes against whites since 1965. I will forgive blacks. They are not responsible for their actions. It is society's fault.

I Shane am of mixed parentage. I have an indentity crisis. I am not 100% accepted by an racial group and therefore denounce them all. I have been indoctrinated to blame whites for everything, and accordingly will do so. I will attack any and all expressions of European solidarity since I am not part of their ingroup.

Very scary indeed...

 

Multiculturalism, by definition, requires the co-existance of seperate races and cultures and also requires that those cultures protect their identity. If they all merge, what we have is one culture, not multiculture. So it is a paradoxical situation in which leftists believe in a multiracial society which requires ethnocentrism and racial collectivism, yet those attributes are also "racist" to them. I think this paradox is actually a great source of mental confusion for leftists whose response is to adopt an attitude in which all races must cling to their racial identities and cultures and celebrate them, except whites, who must accept the destruction of their race and identity and who must be denounced as evil and racist if they so much as talk about the same kind of collectivism that leftists encourage in others. It's nothing short of a selective ideology which somehow manages to express both their love of non-white identity and their hatred of white identity.

As the great scholar Kevin MacDonald has pointed out in his essay on the uniqueness of Western culture (LINK), Westerners are prone to self-depreciation and are extremely susceptible to the manipulation of others into believing in their own inherent evil and the invalidity of their own cultural heritage. This is why you will tend to find, for example, that when leftists express a love of "world music", what you'll see in their record collections is a bunch of African, Arabic, Asian and South American music, but you WON'T find examples of Irish music, Italian music, Bavarian music or any other forms of indigenous white culture. Same with cultural artifacts - they see the collection of African artifacts as somehow more "righteous" than the collection or love of European artifacts. Somehow, leftist whites convince themselves that all other cultures are natural and righteous and that their own heritage is phoney, invalid and even downright evil. It doesn't help that they're infinitely receptive to the ideas and attitudes of anti-white ethnic minorities, whose opinions are apparantly to be listened to, agreed with and adopted at all times. This, in my opinion, shows the racism of white leftists more than anything else, because at the heart of these beliefs is the ultimate yet denied belief that they are infinitely superior to all other non-white races and it is up to them, the morally superior race, to sacrifice their own racial loyalty in favor of the poor, downtrodden, victim races who need the help of white leftists because they aren't capable of helping themselves. That's why leftists denounce their own race and blindly accept the opinions of anti-white ethnics.

One manifestation of this attitude is seen in the ways in which white leftists encourage insular attitudes and jingoism in others, yet denounce it in whites. So for example, when a white town in America which has been nearly all white and insular for generations suddenly sees an influx of hispanic immigrants whose loud cultural identity drowns out that of the long time white residents, any objection to that from the white residents is denounced as racist and they're accused of being xenophobic, jingoistic and "afraid of change". Switch the situation to, say, a small indigenous village in Asia which is, for the sake of argument, seeing an influx of relatively well off white westerners buying houses and settling there as their second home, and all of a sudden the cultural identity of the villagers is at risk and must be protected. White settlers would be referred to as an "invasion" and the fears of the original villagers must be taken seriously. How dare those rich whites force their vulgar western culture upon those poor Asian villagers who just want to keep things the way they have always been? They must be protected! In fact, we don't even have to look that far and theorize that much to find real world examples of this right here in America - gentrification, a code word for "influx of whites". All of a sudden, the long time population of an area is "under threat" from the well off whites who will be changing the character of the neighborhood, and so this must be resisted. Complain about Hispanic immigrants "invading" a white town and changing its character and you're an evil xenophobe who must be denounced.

There is no logic behind it whatsoever. Anti-white leftists have no valid explanation aside from their inherent hatred of whites and white culture, even when they are white themselves. The biggest struggle facing the white race and its survival is in convincing whites that their heritage IS under threat in this way, and that is a difficult task because we live in a Jewish-inspired atmosphere of Cultural Marxism in which the group that is seen as the "dominant" group is automatically oppressive and evil and anyone who sticks up for them is oppressive and evil by default. I see signs of it changing, for example the coming end of political correctness, but it's still an uphill battle and one which should be undertaken by any white person concerned at the brazen attacks on their race.

 

LMFAO!

topolm, are you a third positionalist?

You are, aren't you?

LMFAO!