the fact is that the polls show that more and more people are comming around to the propaganda machine. the percent of people who are willing to change the constitution to let shwarzenegger in the white house has grown by more than 20 percent in the last few years!! i am outraged. first of all, world war II was hardly more than 50 years ago. arnolds dad was an ss nazi! when he died, arnolds mom remarried to another ss nazi! he clearly has nazi ties which people dont mind even when they hear about his dreams of world conquest and being 'the king of the earth'!!! i might, maybe, consider changing the constitution to let a calm, intelligent, nazi free candidate who just happen to have been born in say canada (no way austria.not now, just little more than 50 years after the boldest attempt at world domenation and globilization in the history of the modern world. 50 years isnt alot of time) these are just a few skeletons in schwarzeneggers closet that need to be exposed and talked about. please learn about and share other bits and pieces that may inform and promote discussion. toghether we CAN keep this steroid crazed domineering meat head away from the button. if anyone has any of that famous gay porn he worked on please share.
this is part 3 of a very good alex jones video http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5472804885431532193&q=martial+law&hl=en
I live in California, and he should never have been elected governator by special election. He's strictly a republican pawn.
and exactly what relevence is that? Unless you just dont bother reading anything, you cant fail to have read the fact that your Fuhrer, sorry, presidents family made their money from buying gold from the nazi's AT THE TIME SOLDIERS FROM THE USA WERE DYING FIGHTING THE NAZI's the gold was mostly extracted from the teeth of dead Jews or was melted down jewlery taken from jews. Heir Bush as he was known, also was involved in many other deals with the nazis and actively sympathised with their cause. After the waar the bush family mysteriously became super-wealthy The bush families political stance has not altered since that time, and if you want to know where the money from Nazi Germany went look no further than the Bush family who collectively are about as wealthy as most medium sized countries.
the presidents grandfather made his money by marrying into wealth he was a tire salesman before he was promoted to his job as a nazi money lauderer. bush's family was destined to me the riches and most powerful family since then. arnold shchwartzenegger is backed by bush who is saying quote, dont bet against him, he may be the next american president. that makes me question how many lies and non american political moves the bush family is willing to make to get this guy in office, and yes, the bush's DID INDEED earn their fortune doing tasks for the nazis.
im sorry im a bit wasted at the moment having been woken up arguing with my mom. (last i remember i turned on my computer and started watching msnbc to learn about the montreal school shooting) ***launderer ***bushes family was destined to BEf ****HE(arnold) is LIKELY to be the next american president please no posts about how i should proof read mine.im aware and drunk
Quite apart from the fact that he was a child of around 14 years of age when he finished with the Hitler Youth, I believe it would, at the time, have been imprudent not to join. The political climate was such that by not joining his family would have fallen under the suspicion of the authorities. I do not believe that a child of 14 is or should be held responsible for their political views. By far the vast majority of 14 year olds do not understand political implications even when they are patently obvious to adults. If a 14 year old wanted to join a political party now, adults would patronise the hell out of them. Politics is a complex interaction and not the domain of a child who has just about finished with toy cars at that age. In contrast for the Bush family to have been trading with Nazis when the law expressly condemned such action as traitorous and immoral is hardly the sign of a family fit to have a president within its ranks - let alone two presidents. The fact that the most powerful family in US politics has, for at least 50 years years, been the Bush family hardly suggests that their family motto would have changed much in that time (I dont know what the official family motto is but the unofficial one must be "Heil Hitler ! and Fuck the US military"). There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that the Bush family owes a great deal to the politics of Fascism. It is it not something a family like that would forget. Obviously the ideals they value so much were learned from wartime German politicians In contrast the pope probably forgot all about Nazi ideals the moment he left the Hitler youth and has had time to reflect properly on life. One point though - if you research your history, the catholic church exports the ideals of the roman empire - later called "The holy roman empire" later called "The catholic church"
You'd have thought people would be content with the current level of stupidity in the White House without having to look any further....
does he ......as your constitution is being irradicated by bush and his nazi bastards .....bush can make anything possible " the fascists are on americas doorsteps ...IT REALLY IS TIME FOR THE PEOPLE TO WAKE UP .
And the UK is called the most watched country on Earth and the police in the UK have quite a few bit more powers then in the US......... They may, for example, legally search any suspect who has been arrested, or their vehicles, home or business premises, without a warrant, and may seize anything they find in a search as evidence. All police officers in the United Kingdom, whatever their actual rank, are 'constables' in terms of their legal position. This means that a newly appointed constable has the same arrest powers as a Chief Constable or Commissioner
That's very true, but I don't see how it detracts from Paul's point. Obviously we're concerned about these things too, it isn't a nationalistic game of point scoring over whose country is worse....
maybe madcap thinks us brits should"nt have a point of view when america is being discussed . the title of the thread is ? ....
The irony is, right wing Americans get upset when we attack their president, or their country, and then attack something about the UK that they would probably agree with if their grapes of wrath weren't so sour....
Yeah but here in the UK we actually have a smaller country, its easy to feel free in the USA while here we are so hemmed in it is like a prison camp mentality. Theres no police on the streets, they only guard the very rich areas and the palaces. In the USA you have more space to feel free in. Its not so urgent there to do something about the situation, besides most people in the USA are totaly inline with government sentiment in private whilst political correctnes dictates that they speak out against it - like the UK until about 2 years ago
point of fact, the UK is alot easier to bring down than the united states. when the nazi's tried to bomb the life out of london they managed to hide underground and even though virtually everything was destroyed they bounced back. so this brings up the question of what these terrorists, these guys in caves can REALLY do to our infostructure.I dont believe anyone can hijack 4 planes and crash 3 of them into desired targets without the governments approval. if london could survive a total saturation bombing then im pretty sure america, a huge country full of gun crazed hicks will be just fine. as long as they come at us with anything less than a handfull of nukes im pretty sure america will stand.granted this administration likely wont, which is precicely the fear motive that pushes them to globalize. no matter how irrational a fear may be, its just as strong as a rational one if not truely thought about. and i feel bush dont do to much thunkin'. is the supposed risk really worth this sort of reaction from the united states? the UK and the USA are in the same boat. they're both lead by ridged minded leaders who think of all their citizens as potential terrorists. they want us all to give up our liberties in exchange for security. but the people dont benifit from this kind of security nearly as much as the top tears of government. so why should we give up our freedom for their everlasting security. just so they can sit easy at their high paying high profile govenment jobs! some people just want it all, and schwartzenegger is the type. he talks about his dreams of one day walking the earth as a king among men. i doubt looking behind his back every few yards is part of that dream. once he has the power he's going to want the next thing which is to not have to worry about being overthrown. arnold, george, rove, all have nazi ties. they want what the nazis wanted. they follow the same philosophies as the nazis. arnold im sure can remember back to his SS father telling him to follow the nazi philosophy. NEW LAW: PEOPLE WITH NAZI TIES CANT BE ALLOWED TO CONTROL GOVERNMENT. at least without the peoples consent and understanding that they are being lead by a nazi.
When people are only concerned about their own personal safety, and don't concern themselves with the erosion of constitutional rights we are in trouble. And here in the US we are in trouble, because the majority of the public only wishes to protect their own status. They love to wave the flag and applaud the military, because they feel that's what is protecting them, instead they should be aware that it is our administration and our military which may bring our constitution to it's knees, but they will have their microwave ovens and dvd players, until the administration deems it more profitable to pull those cushy carpets out from under them, and then it will be almost impossible to reverse.