Ohh... ok... take it back lol I think you're right Fine.. my new verdict is that both male and female are agressive rambos lol
we've had girl gangs in my town here, really hard core ones... They almost beat the crap out of me and my mate before we decided to run (I can't hit a girl, so I couldn't fight back, haha) But we've had guy gangs too, I've had a run in with one of those one time, this time they ended up running... I'd say both genders are equally prone to violence... I have my rules tho, based on honour and morale... I never hit someone who's unprepared, I never hit first (those two kinda go together ) I can't hit and girl and I could never hit anyone that's already down... Cause at that point you've already won... I'd say I know equal numbers of aggressive persons of both genders, males just generally are physically stronger cause of the builds and such (and no, that's not up for discussion, it's just a boring fact...)
i said no, but i guess one could come to the conclusion that men are resposible for all the violence in the world, but thats only because there has never been a true Matriarch in the history of the world. women have never "ruled" the world. but i guarantee you, if women were given the same power oppurtunities as men have in world history, they would have been just as fucked up. look at nature, 9 times out of 10, the female of the species is bigger and more violent. women are in no way superior to men in their lust for violence. we're both equally fucked up.
I'll say no. You can't blame the root of all evil/agressive behaviour since the beginning of time on one sex. Nor can you blame it on one race, ethnicity or religion. Just another stereotype that all men are all violent, sex crazed maniacs(more than women), more prone to this shit than women. Fuck that. Women as well as men have both done their fair share of aggressive behaviour.
yeah - but we men can't handle the fact that women can reproduce often - we are fundamentally jealous - and alot of us want to be women.Thats why its like an old joke for a man to be up the pub when his wife is giving birth.(in england especially) - they say alot of terrorism has arisen from western values.Personally I don't quite see it's worth any kind of mass human suffering,(maybe it is an inevitable force at work) but I could understand someone thinking we are a bit clueless in our attitude towards life and the role of a woman in society
I think a cat fight does not necesserily have to do with agressions but more with sex. At least looking at it is extremely sexy, and I think that most girls that do it feel secretely the same even if they would not admit it. Anyway its something total different when to girls tear their cloths apart then when two guys punch each other in the face. And if I would have been the policeman I would have waited until they have fought so long that they both are naked and then I would first take one of them and slap her on her ass until she promises me to be a good girl in the future, and to prove this she would have to give me a blow job. And afterwards I would do the same thing with the other girl.
Um. Have you ever even seen a cat fight? They punch in the face. They kick in the face. They use weapons. It may be all about sex to you, but when your little sister is getting brutally attacked by another female, you may approach the situation differently then you tend to suggest and imagine.
my sister is the meanest, nastiest, most brutal fighter i've ever seen. she's taken down boys and men twice her size. and don't get her drunk AND angry. jesus. she's got rage issues.
Violence against men higher than previously thought Friday 20 October 2006 - 19:32 By Laviinia Dhanagunan The rate of violence against men is higher than previously thought, according to recent statistics re-published by the Australian Bureau of Statistics. he Personal Safety Survey (PSS) is the first survey in Australia to include men among its sample in an attempt to discover more about social violence. The results are somewhat surprising with 10.8% of the male participants admitting to having experienced physical violence in the previous 12 months as compared to 5.8% percent of female participants. It also found that 30% of victims of sexcual assault are men. PSS was re-issued in August 2006 as there were mistakes in the presentation of the results but Michael Woods, a lecturer in University of Western Sydney, says that the methodology of the survey is quite credible when compared to the International Violence Against Women Survey (IVAWS) which was managed by UNIFEM in 2004. The IVAWS did not include in its methodology the “by women against women” violence factor which is probably best taken from lesbian relationships. In a 1994 report by the then Victorian Injury Surveillance System (now known as the Victorian Injury Surveillance Unit), the issue of violence in lesbian relationships was brought up and said to be a “…significant social problem”. On the VISS database there were estimated to be 288 positive cases - those in which domestic violence was explicitly involved - 239 were female and 49 were male. However, from that sample, it was found that male injuries tended to be significantly more severe -- 19 females and 12 males required hospital admission, which is nearly 25 per cent of men interviewed as compared to 8 per cent of women. That finding, taken more than a decade ago, though confined to Victoria, seems to validate the argument that violence against men is a reality and should be addressed. The PSS also found that men not only experienced violence in the home but outside it as well. Jim Carter, from the Canberra branch of the Lone Fathers Association, said that men did not get much recognition about this partly because of negative representation. The reporting rates for men who were victims of violence was relatively low and in some instances when a man reported the situation, he was arrested. This just played in with the societal attitude towards men, which was fairly negative. It did not help that other factors like gender politics and misrepresentation by the media played against men as well. http://www.nowuc.com.au/news.php?extend.406
Cherche le femme Also, look at most of the long relations/Marriages and how the woman is behaving against her partner, you will get the answer.
Each man is half-man/half-woman; every woman the same. More and more women are FINALLY discovering the man trapped inside them. Just look at the incarceration rates in this country, women leading the pack, which says, more and more women are discovering the man parked inside. Drive on the freeways and see the aggressive women drivers. More and more of them. They serve in the military now. They can work as auto mechanics, they can work any job now a man can work. I work at a nursing home. A patient falls on the floor, and what do women do, they rush to the nearest male nursing assistant for assistance. Sorry! When they say: Gee! You're a man! You can get him off the floor for me. I say: You're making a sexist comment and I'm going to report you. All nursing assitants are paid equally, and I'm not paid any more to assist a woman who's just as capable of lifting a patient off the floor as I am. No, I'm going to assist a woman changing a flat tire along the road today. They're perfectly capable of doing that themselves. What happend to the Men's Liberation movement which got started in the 1970's (The Hazards of Being a Male-great book) and petered out? It's the men who need liberation equally as well as women. Women can get by calling their female friends girlfriends, yet when a man uses that term to refer to a male friend, he's looked upon suspiciously. Women can dance together at a nightclub and no suspicions are aroused. If men tried that, suspicions, suspicions, suspicions! Time has come for men to join together and develop a strong liberation movement. Boy, do we need it!!! Women are just as capable of violence as men. And let's not forget these passive aggressive non-violent types. As they say, passive aggressive people SUBCONSCIOUSLY bring out the anger and violence in others. so if women are categorized as such, then, subconsciously, they're just as guilty as starting a war as anyone else. And these nonviolent, passive aggressive types are the types that our society feels it's safe to release from prison. Come again!? In my opinion they're even MORE DANGEROUS than the angry, violent individual.
I'm pretty sure women would have become exactly the same if they'd been in the dominant position that men have for centuries. I've been privy to conversations among women about finding ways to really piss off one of their boyfriends (they were actually writing a list!) that leads me to believe that, given the chance, women would be just as capable of cruelty and evil as any man. It's a view that's out there, even today, when women like Margaret Thatcher have shown us that gender is no obstacle. They usually counter by saying that women have to act like men to even be in power, so if a woman in power did start a war, it would still be our fault.
This isnt a problem about men - this is a problem about men whose perceptions have been altered by the conditions of society. Politicians for example have been allowed for too long to massacre people in wars that seek only to protect the industries and lifestyles of the rich. Now they believe it is their right to do that. All the other things mentioned are merely individuals that cannot controll their behaviour. They are defective - but some women have defects too that are just as harmful. women also murder, and some women are paedophiles, some women are agressive and violent too
I'm also curious about one of the poll options "it is our natural instinct and I am ashamed". Why would anyone feel ashamed of their natural instincts?
No sir, i'm 100% Male. No way We Are Equal humans yes - but they are Female Human and moi Male Human. Also believe that Women get the most, yet they complain the most too But what can we do - Damn hormones. :drool: