Rabbit Warning

Some of you have met White Rabbit at Gatherings and it seems that he is under AGR fire & flames right now, with just cause; he has 2 convictions for possession of child pornography & after doing much research on the web, we felt that we should warn other Family of this. In addition to being listed on the State of Texas Sexual Offenders website, he also has his name listed in several Manson Family websites. His name is now mud in Austin & he may look to Rainbow Family folks as an escape. Please watch out for White Rabbit/Larry Melton/ Joseph Gallager (this name may be misspelled)

 

ewww what a freak! I will protect the children while i'm home! I don't know this guy, but I'll keep an eye out for a creapy dude. Thanks for posting about this! I'm not a mama, but I care for children.

 

would it be unrainbow-like to ask someone to post a pic of this person?

 

https://records.txdps.state.tx.us/soSearch/soDetail.cfm?ShowNav=False&dps_number=05873780



interesting,, found the link in this thread..

http://www.hipforums.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2778116#post2778116

 

I just made this thread a sticky...I feel info such as this...cannot be expressed enough...and our younger members need to be aware that this shit does happen...and exposing these scum bags ...can never be repeated enough.....fellow old timers,keep your eyes open and help educate our young

 

I saw this guy on the other thread and this is very disturbing.



Has this guy done something else other than his old charge? Because I'd think it awful harsh to ban someone and keep a witch hunt going if this dude just did something say four or five years ago, paid the price and stayed out of trouble since.

I'd hate to know that anything I did in my past and paid for already would be used to force me out of society over and over again.

I am just not as paranoid as some. And yes, I have two small children. I just know that the statistics of molestation are family members or close friends 9 times outta 10 and not some guy hiding in the bushes.

 

Yeah libertine...he didn't heed the warnings from myself in the chat room....when I was getting numerous complaints from the younger females... he was basically trolling...so I banned him...and when I did he took it out to the forums and personally attacked me over it...so there are two offenses that got him perma banned...the fact of his past didn't come out until well after he was gone..so it had nothing to do with his old charges...it had to do with his current actions...and since his past has been brought to light...it is only fair to make sure he is exposed for the scum that he is actually...condemn me if you must but this type of info should be spread far and wide....and if that makes me a part of a police state or whatever you wish to call me so be it...these scum bags are wasting good air that a decent human being could be breathing...and to stand up for them doesn't shine very good light upon you as far as I am concerned

 

The ruination of another child's life is too high a price to pay. It's very possible he has a family and fits right in to those statistics. Think about that. Crime is bad enough, but one against a child is the worst hate crime of all.

 

Actually.... the guy is quite the person to be on the alert for. He was posting just last week in Agro under one of the minor's names he has had a bad past with. Just goes to show that he is up to no good still. The guy probally should not be on a computer at all.

 

Here, Here Fyl!!!! I stand with Fyl !!! And I am ARMED. Rainbow or not this hits home to all of us, or at least it sure damn should.

When a dog is rabid how many kids does it get to bite before it dies?!? NONE!! People that think like Libertene are not part of the solution and is causing part of the problem. You can 'go easy' on a pot smoker, a thief even, but never ever a dirty dog that harms children. Hang 'em from the highest tree, for all the people to see.

Right On Ldy, Tell it brother phucker!!!

sh

 

That answers my question. Thanks.

For shameless and the others...don't get angry with me because I ask questions. It's just my nature.

Sorry if I don't jump on the witch hunt band wagon of hanging sex offenders, but I hardly think that SOME of them -- such as the ones in jail for slapping a girl's ass and such--are more harmful to society than murderers or violent criminals.

Yes, there are predators out there and they should be watched closely and dealt with when and IF they act out a crime.

However, we cannot constitutionally or ethically (and thankfully) pre-punish people (yet) nor should we stretch ONE CRIMINAL ELEMENT so far as some states claiming they can't live 1,000 from anywhere where minors congregate (for example). Minors congregate EVERYWHERE. What's next? A law that strips driver's licenses from sex offenders and then a law that states that they can't take public transportation, ride a bike or walk? And that if anyone gives them a ride they can be charged? I mean, where does emotional irrationality stop making laws and rationality starts?

Sorry, I don't mean to rant on such a touchy subject, but as a parent of two small children and a member of the ACLU, I see that the paranoia is a skewed view of reality. Sure kids are abducted and molested by strangers and those people should be dealt with (as I said before), but if we don't stop the paranoia it could spread to others, other groups, and before long we could be on a slippery slope. IF we allow unconstitutional laws to be made and witch hunts to happen to even the most reprehensible members of society we open the door for this to happen to anyone.

That's why we have the Constitution and why REASON, not blind rage, is (or should be) the source behind law.

 

What's next? A law that strips driver's licenses from sex offenders and then a law that states that they can't take public transportation, ride a bike or walk? And that if anyone gives them a ride they can be charged? I mean, where does emotional irrationality stop making laws and rationality starts?



Dam dude whats your zip code, ya got a pedofile in you or your family on the state list? Your pretty compassionate towards these sick fucks?

Nothing personal here but it seems its an ok issue in your world.

 

Now, you can do better than that typical response.

Are all lawyers who defend murderers actually murderers themselves? Do they love murder? Of course not. Don't be ridiculous!

I am nothing more than a civil libertarian asking questions. I do not govern from blind rage like most people, but through probing to find answers for all questions--even the most disturbing and controversial ones.

Thus, my "defense" is not of pedophiles, but of the Constitution and where the limitations of the law lie.

You have attempted to distort what I have said and tried to stir an emotional response. Yet, you either KNOW what I am talking about and wanting to play dumb or you generally misunderstood me.

I hope it was the latter.

And to answer your question: I am not, nor is anyone in my immediate family a sex offender. Thanks.

 

To all those in favor of sending all the sex offernds to Libertines house say I. He is welcoming and has kids to boot.

You really need counciling Libertine. There are some places where lines must be drawn and this is one of them. No one is taking any rights away from any one., and by societies standards and the laws that be, paroles have no rights untill they finish their parole. If you break the constitution by committing a crime are you still privy to use the constitution to cry and whine about injustic when you get caught..

sh

 

Only if his kids were not at home.

 

Now, I need "counciling"?

You are being silly. The places where the lines are drawn in THIS country is (or should be) the Constitution. As I said before, if we use any unconstitutional method against ANY individual or group, then it opens the door for ANYONE to use this excuse.

I think if you read what I said earlier (which you obviously didn't), you'd understand that I do believe in dealing with criminals, but NOT by using methods which are questionable to the Constitutionality of the law and definitely not be creating laws through pure blind rage.

You're old enough to understand me, you are just being melodramatic in order to get people to crucify people who think like me.

Did you vote for George W. Bush?

 

What about people in other countries where the sacred "constitution" has no jurisdiction. Not like chimp even obeys it but in other places pedos dont have the same rights. So there is no use pretending they are good people just because in america they are. We are flying this pedo john karr first class and giving him champagne and prawns. We should have let him rot in a thai jail.

 

Sultan, do I sense a little bitterness at the Constitution?

Besides, what other countries do and their laws are their own. The Constitution does not cover them. But, THIS IS THIS COUNTRY and the Constitution applies here. And it should apply here. Otherwise, we could just pick a "Witch of The Week" and burn them.

The Law of Our Land protects people and groups from being crusaded against, but given justice through our system and the Constitutional law.

If you and your friends here don't like it--if you want a totalitarian or vigilante society, there are plenty of other nations to move to. That is...until Bush decides to invade them.

 

I understand your coming from a legal standpoint. And even sick bastards like him are supposed to have rights in the eyes of the law. It's very hard to deal with this subject in a logical, rational manner when children are involved.Tell me, if he hurt one of your kids (God forbid that should ever happen) would you still want him to go to trial? Or just take him out? I know that sounds cold but when it comes to people's children we don't act in a rational manner even if we should. This is not a dis on you so please don't take it that way. And NO I didn't vote for that blood sucker.

 

Ok. Finally, someone who can discuss the issue reasonably... I hope.

If one of my children were molested, I would be in favor of the criminal paying for it, obviously. I think I already stated this twice, though.

I agree with you that we don't act rationally when personally offended, but that goes with anything.

It still doesn't mean that we should be an exception to the law of the land or constitutional ethics in order to suit our rage. We may as well have vigilantism governing the nation then.

With one crack in the foundation of the Constitution, by allowing unconstitutional laws to be ok'd for one miserable group, would allow people like BushCo. to use it for anyone they deemed "inappropriate" or the "enemy".

We have to deal with sex offenders the same as other criminals--lawfully and ethically. That was my whole point until everyone went batshit crazy here and started calling me names and saying they want to send pedophiles to my house.