What do YOU think?

I dont know about that. Plus, if that were the case, that would be an argument for our side anyway, dont you think?

 

i think there illeagal cuz in the da 60's they saw how people change from it and go crazy from it in good and bad wayz, and its too hard and uncontroled for america to deal with, so making it ILLEAGAL is one less thing to worry about, plus if the write people do em, they might grow and relise stuff that the government doesnt want them to relise, and manipulate more poeple to agree with him (against the government)

 

As for LSD, the CIA spearheaded its production in the post-WW2 years and used it as an experimental drug on hundreds of unwitting subjects who didn't know what they were being given. These subjects were given various rewards in exchange, including heroin and 'favours' in case they got into trouble with the law. Then it got out of hand when it came to be used as a recreational drug. John Lennon once said, "They (the CIA) invented LSD to control people and what they did was give us freedom. "
So that's why psychedelic are illegal. Because they give us freedom and make us question authority.

 

Yes and authority almost never wants to stop and evaluate and permit the possibility that they are not seeing the whole picture, that they may be wrong.
This explains why political and military forces promit prohibition. However for the vast majority of the population it is: the indescriminate lumping of psychedelics into the category of illegal narcotics, ignorance, and a skewed perspective passed down from biased authority.

I think as things become less polarized between pro-drug and anti-drug advocates it will be easier for society to view these substances objectively and think of them as tools or sacraments. As this movement gains momentum, laws can be restructured to permit use under certain conditions.

 

because the government can't control shit and they want to so they make it illegal and try to get rid of it. its a problem to them.