On 10 February 1999 the Italian Supreme Court of Appeal in Rome overturned a rape conviction, stating that jeans are unable to be removed without the wearer's consent. Therefore, they ruled, the supposed victim must have been an active participant in the act. [2] This last verdict, however, was also overturned, on 28 November 2001 by the Italian Supreme Court of Cassation, which finally established that wearing jeans does not exclude rape. [3] Haha?
Jeans fetishism is a sexual fetish relating to jeans or denim, particularly worn by women but also by men. It can also involve printed or electronic material with jeans being worn. There are a number of jeans fetish sites, mostly pornographic in nature. Jeans fetishism can involve: * torn jeans * jeans being worn during sex How in the fuck can jeans be worn during sex? ()
well I can see how that would work, moreso than the jeans... jeans really restrict movement in those situations, i've noticed with zippers open and all, etc
Muwahahahaha. TMI. Though I know what you are talking about. Even if you aren't having sex...they hinder other sexual acts.
Although this case could be kinda funny if the Italian supreme court really didn't know how pants worked. Comming out to deliberate with their pants hanging around their knees.
i'de like to state with tight girls jens even with the wearers consent it take alot of work sometime especially in a rush
