IF 9/11 was a proven hoax, what next???

I am referring to Hani Hanjour, the alleged pilot of the 757 which allegedly crashed into the Pentagon, if you accept the ridiculous "official" conspiracy theory.

My comment concerning naysayers was not directed at you, toni. This matter has a history in these forums that well predates this thread. Those I am addressing know who they are. Stay cool.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hani_Hanjour . I see , we are on the same page now. Thankyou.

I don't believe you, you initialy said 'naysayer' rather than 'naysayerS'.

Let the naysayer continue to deny the obvious inside planning and execution by those most capable and most repeatedly shown to be wanton liars. Such desperation to believe the explanation made by such untrustworthy sources (and their enablers) at this point can only be diagnosed as willful self deception.

Forgive me if i took this as relating to me. i don't think i would find many people who think it was NOT relating to myself.

Don't worry i will. Just be a little more careful what you say and how you say it. I'm keeping my eye on you young man.

 

Apologies for missing the "s" but I do make typos like everyone else from time to time. Try not to fall into grammar nazi arguments, it has a tendency to distract from the content of the discussion. Thanks.

 

You can see my point though.

Good grief i make loads, i apologise if i came across rude.

I am glad i picked up on it though, atleast now i know you meant no malice.

wanks oops sorry thanks for clearing that up.

 

First of all pressed rat I would like to know where you get your information because you have posted on other threads and say you read google videos. I just want to know how valid your information is because if you were only getting information from annonymous sources on google then you really don't have valid information, at all. Now if you named some books you read then maybe I would consider what you say as valid.

 

I went and read his previous posts. I noted quite a few books he has read.

I am sure he WILL post a long list though

 

I would hope he is reading books because Im getting sick of his accusations and assumptions.

 

I understand what you mean:

http://hipforums.com/forums/showpost.php?p=2470277&postcount=4

No mention of the subsequent speach by Mr Bush.

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/15/washington/15text-bush.html?ex=1148011200&en=035ac316fe6b30b8&ei=5087%0A

Anyhoo none of us are perfect. We ALL have flawed rationales. If somebody was to suggest they knew everything about everything and the interconnectivness of everything with everything else . Or knew the machinations of every governing body and organisation. Then i would truely call them a delusional fool. From what i have read , i don't think he makes such a claim. Not outrightly anyway.

As you have not posted much it is a little unfair to be so harsh imho.

 

To call it a hoax is like calling WW2 a minor battle in the war to end all wars
It does no justice to the people who died
It was not a hoax it was an attack by the United States Government on thousands of innocent victims so that murderers like George Bush and Donald Rhumsfeld could
initiate their ambitions to own large tracts of oil rich lands. Dick Cheney and his cronies are equally if not more guilty. You should read this it shows how the US government was prepared to attack it own people in false flag attacks to justify its troops having a war in cuba and other areas during the 1960's and is probably where the 911 attacks came from

 

hey i think you all should watch loose change
www.loosechange911.com
sickest movie ever.

 

The 911 conspiracy groups are making some nice money off of it.



.

 

Um, first things first. Assemble your grand expose, then worry 'bout what's next.

 

Correction: Our Military Industrial Complex and Western Intelligence Services along with a sea of Multinationals, Banks, and SME tech firms are making themselves fat off the fraud. All at the expense of falsely labelled terrorists and duly isolated/weakened foreign nations ripe for conquest and resource plundering.

The 911 apologists would do well to wake up and smell reality. Their children and grandchildren wont be thanking them for the world they have helped make possible with their blind, sheepish endorsements.

 

The conspiracy enthusiasts are doing the same thing as the government, although not on as grand a scale.

.

 

You mean the truth enthusiasts surely. The only "conspiracy enthusiasts" would be those buying into and propagating the ridiculous explanations scripted by the government and reinforced continually by its media mouthpieces.

No real comparison whatsoever between the efforts of those seeking to unmask this criminal fraud and those lining up for the budgetary winfalls accruing to those who continue to enable it.

 

Yes, Swiftboat Scholars for 911 Truth. Yet another 'truth' movement. If they haven't already, they should get a job with the government spreading misinformation. They'd make a lot more money than they do now.

.

 

Maybe the conspiracy groups can clear up what happened with flight 93. Why would the government shoot down flight 93 if these aircraft were supposedly a part of the government plot to attack itself? That means the government attacked its own plan to attack itself.

If they allegedlly attacked it because it was hijacked by terrorists, then that goes against the 'no-terrorist' theory that conspiracy enthusiasts are purporting.

I'm sure someone will come up with a creative answer. Such as: There really were terrorists on board 93, but only that flight, so the government had to shoot them down in case they screwed up. Or: They shot it down to give the impression to the public that the terrorists who weren't really on board weren't perfect. Or: 93 never existed and the government made a big hole in the ground to trick everyone.

Anyone got anything more creative?

BTW, no one has shown any evidence that the government shot down 93 in the first place. I'm sure someone will quote Christopher Bollyn claiming he spoke to some un-named person at the FBI who said it was shot down.

.

 

Here's a website of eminent scholars searching for 9/11 Truth: http://st911.org

Of course, these researchers could make more money by helping to spread official Bush Administration lies than they do from discovering the truth. But they tell the truth anyway, because they aren't stupid corupted materialists like you, Shaggie! What are you even doing on Hip Forums with a yuppie attitude like that?

 

once most of our country opens their eyes and ears to the fact that our consitution and our rights have been thrown out the window years ago then there will be a revolution soon come. I believe this time is approaching us quickly.

 

i've been waiting for an opportunity like that