Jyllands Posten refused to publish lampooning Christ

​

The Guardian​

Danish paper rejected Jesus cartoons ​

Gwladys Fouché
Monday February 6, 2006

​

Jyllands-Posten, the Danish newspaper that first published the cartoons of the prophet Muhammad that have caused a storm of protest throughout the Islamic world, refused to run drawings lampooning Jesus Christ, it has emerged today. ​

The Danish daily turned down the cartoons of Christ three years ago, on the grounds that they could be offensive to readers and were not funny. ​

In April 2003, Danish illustrator Christoffer Zieler submitted a series of unsolicited cartoons dealing with the resurrection of Christ to Jyllands-Posten.​

Zieler received an email back from the paper's Sunday editor, Jens Kaiser, which said: "I don't think Jyllands-Posten's readers will enjoy the drawings. As a matter of fact, I think that they will provoke an outcry. Therefore, I will not use them." ​

The illustrator said: "I see the cartoons as an innocent joke, of the type that my Christian grandfather would enjoy." ​

"I showed them to a few pastors and they thought they were funny." ​

But the Jyllands-Posten editor in question, Mr Kaiser, said that the case was "ridiculous to bring forward now. It has nothing to do with the Muhammad cartoons. ​

"In the Muhammad drawings case, we asked the illustrators to do it. I did not ask for these cartoons. That's the difference," he said. ​

"The illustrator thought his cartoons were funny. I did not think so. It would offend some readers, not much but some." ​

The decision smacks of "double-standards", said Ahmed Akkari, spokesman for the Danish-based European Committee for Prophet Honouring, the umbrella group that represents 27 Muslim organisations that are campaigning for a full apology from Jyllands-Posten. ​

"How can Jyllands-Posten distinguish the two cases? Surely they must understand," Mr Akkari added. ​

Meanwhile, the editor of a Malaysian newspaper resigned over the weekend after printing one of the Muhammad cartoons that have unleashed a storm of protest across the Islamic world. ​

Malaysia's Sunday Tribune, based in the remote state of Sarawak, on Borneo island, ran one of the Danish cartoons on Saturday. It is unclear which one of the 12 drawings was reprinted. ​

Printed on page 12 of the paper, the cartoon illustrated an article about the lack of impact of the controversy in Malaysia, a country with a majority Muslim population. ​

The newspaper apologised and expressed "profound regret over the unauthorised publication", in a front page statement on Sunday. ​

"Our internal inquiry revealed that the editor on duty, who was responsible for the same publication, had done it all alone by himself without authority in compliance with the prescribed procedures as required for such news," the statement said. ​

The editor, who has not been named, regretted his mistake, apologised and tendered his resignation, according to the statement. ​

Source: http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1703501,00.html#article_continue​

Relevant links: (1) (2) Muslims your attention please​

Peace and love


​

Yours Sincerely,​

Cat Stevens​

Cat Stevens' latest threads​

​

Note: Silly, Irrelevant, and the like, responses, posts, comments will be ignored (it depends on my mood and time if I won't ignore them), taking off the topic is losers' style losers' fate , ask yourself: will you write such response if the writer wasn't a Muslim!​

​

​

​

 

One standard: they print what they please.

 

Double Standards​

Peace and love
Yours Sincerely,​

Cat Stevens​

​

Note: Silly, Irrelevant, and the like, responses, posts, comments will be ignored (it depends on my mood and time if I won't ignore them), taking off the topic is losers' style losers' fate , ask yourself: will you write such response if the writer wasn't a Muslim!​

​

 

So what! Since when do Muslims get to decide what newspapers in a foreign non-Muslim country can and cannot publish!? If Jylands posten wants to publish Muhammad cartoons they have the right to do so, if they don't want to publish Jesus cartoons they have the right not to. Heck, if they want to publish naked pictures of their mothers they have the right to do that. That's freedom Cat, get it? Have it?

 

I think there is a difference between freedom & doubls-standards, link​

Peace and love
Yours Sincerely,​

Cat Stevens​

Note: Silly, Irrelevant, and the like, responses, posts, comments will be ignored (it depends on my mood and time if I won't ignore them), taking off the topic is losers' style losers' fate , ask yourself: will you write such response if the writer wasn't a Muslim!​

​

 

Newspapers have one motivation: profit. They will do nothing to alienate those they are trying to sell underwear and all-season radials to, since alienation decreases their circulation causing their ad revenue to fall.

 

yeah, yeah ,yeah
​

Peace and love
Yours Sincerely,​

Cat Stevens​

Note: Silly, Irrelevant, and the like, responses, posts, comments will be ignored (it depends on my mood and time if I won't ignore them), taking off the topic is losers' style losers' fate , ask yourself: will you write such response if the writer wasn't a Muslim!​