If you had to choose between having 10 people very close to you killed or 1,000,000 people you don't know killed, which would you choose?
je pense.. yeah, that's probably what I'd go for I think... hard to say what my reaction would really be like
If it were up to me id say fuckem all, everyone, way more than 10k let the chips fall as they may, id survive, ive no doubts on this one.
If I got to pick the 1,000,000 it'd be a no brainer. HIV+ Carriers. Call me sick but we dont have a cure and thats the only surefire way to get rid of it. That is if only one million were positive. That or those asians who cheat on CS:S... or religious extremists... Fuck theres a lot of people Id kill... Do I only get a million?
hey, i got a better idea, they call it lateral thinking let's unit those 1,000,010 people and kill the lunatic see our problem? we only choose between bad and worse there's no better or best, we're all the products of human evolution, and we're not as civilized as we think...
Oh come on. Your telling that every single human on this planet deserves life? My ass. Rapsists, Child Molesters, people who mutilate their animals, people who beat those who are weaker them (ie, wives/children), murders (Ie, Ted Bundy, Charlie Manson, Dahmer) people who have an STD and still have sex with their partner without telling them (oh yeah their out there) Your telling me those people deserve to live? You can get a million to try and kill me but I guarentee I'll take a lot of fuckers down with me. I'm guessing somewhere in the high thousands... Wait do I get to use bombs, or just automatic weapons =D
u need to calm down believe me i hate them more than u do and i hate those who wander around all day playing games, fail to contribute to our nation but u just cant kill them all
It didn't take long for this thread to descend to the level of Hatred.. The original poster was more curious as whether mathemitics or personal emotional gain would rule our decision.
A) I am calm Hiker. I just curse too much. Sorry for the miscommunication. B) Theres no hostillity in my words, just calm, if a little sick, logic. C) I took the mathmatics and emotion right out of the problem and instantly worked it into a -searching for the word here- selective? decision that would benifit all humanity. There are people in this world we could do without. And in a choice between losing 10 people I love or 1-100 million people that dont mean shit to this world... aint really a choice at all. D) The contribution to the nation... That flame war is for another thread my friend =P
already a lot to suffer, just want a little peace but the original poster really gave us a good question, to reveal humanity
He did say 1,000,000 people who we don't know.. Not knowing if they're disease carriers (How can you select these people for extermination????), rapists, scientists or active promoters of peace should only make this a more interesting debate. Would you sacrifice potential over your own heartache..
See thats tricky.... If its a lottery system then who knows. But I dont know 1,000,000 disease carriers, rapists, murders etc so in a TECHNICAL sense, I could still pick them based on the fact that I dont know them. Or, kill 1,000,000 deathrow and lifer inmates... free up some damn room in our already overcrowded prisions
My suffering isn't worth the suffering of a million families. What kind of fucking demented genie is giving me that choice? I'd take option three of killing whoever was trying to make me choose. Theres always an alternative.