I don't think that makes you a ho, I think being a ho is when you accept money for sex. I think I just described a lot of marriages! HA! You make a great point. I guess I have never really been in a position to have one, but I personally think I would get too attached.
aww thanks Mrs. H. its nice for you to say i'm not a ho. but the sad truth is... i definatly at least used to be. :& either i just got older and wiser... or i'm losing interest. eithe way, i'm definatly much calmer sexually than i used to be. i think a big part of why i dont get attached or feel guilty about it is my history with sex. it was introduced to me as something you did in order to get someone to love you, not the other way around. of course, i learned the truth later, but by then a lot of damage had already been done. i guess in short, i really enjoy sex, and i dont like passing chances up. but i see a very big difference between having sex with someone, and fucking for just one night.
That is interesting, Diamonds. I can't separate the two. I can't imagine just having casual sex. Not saying that it is wrong, I just can't see myself ever being able to do that. Sometimes it would be cool to be able to do that I think, but in my position, I hope I never have the chance to. I have been able to talk sexually with people however, and I am trying to work out how I can talk so casually, but I don't feel I could act on my thoughts without feeling I was doing something wrong. Probably more of that wonderful Catholicism, huh?
I'm all for one-night stands. Fuck-buddies are ideal, tho. Relationship sex is also wonderful, but I don't know if I'm ready for that right now. There is nothing so sublime as getting lost in passion with someone you're attracted to (especially if you really love them, of course). When you really let go of your inhibitions, then everything except this other person, your interaction with them, and the pleasure you're feeling just ceases to exist. And I LOVE LOVE LOVE the excitement of seduction and discovering someone for the first time. Man, that's a rush. Sure, you can seduce someone you're in a relationship with, but there's a certain excitement of the unknown that you only get with a new person. Man, I've been so pent up lately, I'll be totally happy just if I find someone attractive to...uh...explore .
I think some girls can confuse sex for love, then it makes things difficult for my girl friends that do them. But if you can do it casually and have no emotional damage from it then go girl do your thang, it doesn't make you a ho I wasn't good at the night stand, had sex for like hours, too drunk, and felt really weird the next day. I think his name was Trevor????????
ok first of all, you are sexy and second, Zep - that is one lovely nugget but to get back to teh topic, no way would i do that one night stand.. Sex-related fun is temporary, some Std's are forever. Oh and let me clarify something, when i say STD's, i'm talking about sexually transmitted diseases - NOT smashing till dawn. i dont know if we have any n00bs/n00bcakes, ubers, uberleets, or pwnz0rs, but just so we are all on the same page here, i'm not talking about playing super smash brothers melee for gc.. Hope this footnote helps in you understanding where i'm coming from
A one night stand no strings attached with a friend is differnt. But when you're with a stranger you have no idea where they've been and what kind of STDs they might have. Forget that. I will only have sex with people I know and trust.
thats why its called a "one night stand" feelings are not meant to be invovled. One night stands are boring, all night everynigh fucking is awsome!
tonight? No way. Fifteen years ago? Yeah, sure, no problem, but it would have to be the right sort of person. First time me and DH hooked up was a one-night-stand, didn't hear from him again for a few years, and here we are now, been together almost 14 years now.