Well, to begin with, if there is such minimal oxygen in outer space then how the fuck can the sun burn so hot and bright. Thus leading me to my mind fuck, the sun must have a ozone such as us, holding in some sort of oxygen or flamable gas. Also, since we've never been able to go to the sun, there must be some sort of life form on it, but wev'e never seen them because its too hot to go on (obviously) And you know how 75% of earth is water, well the lifeforms on the sun can never come here it is much too cold anyhow, no matter even if your on the equator, they would simply be burnt out like a candle. And we cant go to the sun because we'll fry like a crisp. So this difference in planets and people structure, doesnt allow or proper research of either planet for either lifeform, so therefore we never know about the sun people and they never know about us, because there is impossible for either or to go to.
nope. it don't work that way at all. it's a nuclear furnace. i don't remember all the details of exactly how it works, but i can tell you it isn't combustion like the way a fire burns in air which is really just a very rapid and voilent oxidization or rusting chemical reaction. two totaly different things. calling what the sun, any star, which is what the sun is, does burning, is a metaphore only, other then that it does produce heat. but heat isn't the only thing it produces either. you ought to ask occam about this, or just go to a planatarium show if there's one in the town where you live or the nearest college city to it. combustion is chemical. what sun/stars do is nuclear. as for life forms in a nuclear furnace, well i guess the'd be radiation efreets, who don't breathe oxygen either. that part is almost plausable. life forms that don't breath oxygen exist on earth now, in the organic goo ooze in the bottom of ponds and sometime on their surface. the're called anarobic, meaning that they don't need or use oxygen in any form. there are also methane breathers on gas worlds, or at least in principal there could be, although to human experience confomation of their existence as forms more highly evolved then protiens has yet to become certain. you're right about us not being able to live on the surface of a sun though, if a sun even has what could be called a surface, which i don't remember for sure if it even does. and anything that could live there, could like us, never completely leave the environment we came to exist in, having to take little bits of it arround with us in our space suits. stellar efreets, could, in principal, if they existed and were sentient, perhapse fassion an equivelant 'space suit' in which they could pack their environment arround with them. the radiation that would leak out would still be fatal to us to get anywhere near them. interesting thought though. =^^= .../\...
i don't see how. also fact isn't quite the right word. facts are a fantasy too. there are only tenative conclusions that work, have for a while, and seem likely to continue doing so. other things can exist also. we just can't actualy KNOW anything about them. just have strong feelings. =^^= .../\...
yup. remember that we live in a paradigm, and that, by historical deduction, most of the things we believe to be basic and true are probably wrong.
