WWF commercial

Discussion in 'Politics' started by scents&subtlesou, Feb 16, 2006.

  1. scents&subtlesou

    scents&subtlesou Member

    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    1
    the wildlife folks at WWF had a great commercial airing in Canada.....it is all the world leaders meeting at a womans house who is holding a Global Warming Summit.....she is starting to talk about what they can do to stop global warming.....and while she is talking a middle eastern guy is whispering into white guys ear, and she says "America" like a teacher telling a student to listen. it was very good. hope some one has seen it.
     
  2. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Messages:
    33,965
    Likes Received:
    2,508
    "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation"

    -- Prince Philip, WWF founder, in his Foreward to If I Were An Animal, United Kingdom, Robin Clark Ltd., 1986



    I suggest you read up on the WWF. Learn who was behind its creation in 1961, who is currently behind it, who funds it, and what their REAL objective is. I can tell you their true objective isn't "saving the environment."

    If the WWF was actually about saving the environment, I would support their cause in a second. Unfortuately, it's all about land-grabbing, eugenics/population control, and world government.

    How many people know that past WWF board members have included Bilderberg founder Prince Bernhard, Hollinger media gopher and Bilderberg member Conrad Black, Shell chairman John Loudon, King Juan Carlos of Spain, Prince Henrik of Denmark, and accused drug dealer Henry Keswick?

    It's about time people realize that the environmental movement has been hijacked.

    I am not saying we should stop caring about the environment, rather we should research some of these organizations before pledging blind allegience to them. Just because they appear to be for a good cause, doesn't mean they are.

    The same goes for non-environmental organizations as well, such as the Red Cross, which is another government front used for funneling money.
     
  3. scents&subtlesou

    scents&subtlesou Member

    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    1
    thats cool. i thought the commercial was pretty good though.
     
  4. rangerdanger

    rangerdanger Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,601
    Likes Received:
    2
    WWF is looked upon favorably by most other pro-environmental organzations.


    As far as the Red Cross goes, how is providing shelter to a family (my sister's)whose house just burned down, funding blood drives and working to ensure basic humane treatment for prisoners a bad thing?
     
  5. Pointbreak

    Pointbreak Banned

    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    1
    That's because other environmental organizations are globalists too. Or else they are dupes. Only trust groups like the John Birch Society.
    Because they are doing it to advance globalist agendas. If they really cared they'd sit at home reading stories on infowars and prisonplanet.
     
  6. Megara

    Megara Banned

    Messages:
    4,719
    Likes Received:
    0
    We could just as easily say "Canada" or "Germany" or "France"

    is any country even on target to meet its kyoto obligations? I heard UK was for awhile, but now they're in danger of not meeting those goals...

    Then again, it is easier to blame someone else than realize that you suck.
     
  7. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Messages:
    33,965
    Likes Received:
    2,508
    Yeah, and they're probably all run by the same people at the top. Most of the larger, well-known environmental groups have been infiltrated and taken over, and are being manipulated to serve the agenda of the globalists. Many of them, like the WWF, are run by the globalists themselves.

    I am not saying the Red Cross doesn't do some good things. 98% of the people in the Red Cross are probably good people who mean well. But I am not going to ignore the fact that the Red Cross is run by criminals at the top levels, as are most large organizations, and that much of the money donated to the Red Cross by well-meaning people has been displaced or altogether lost (looted). Did you ever ask yourself where all the money people donated in the wake of 9/11 has went?
     
  8. rangerdanger

    rangerdanger Senior Member

    Messages:
    2,601
    Likes Received:
    2
    Hahahaha I remember them. My friend blew up one of their bookstores (back in the 70's when they advocated public execution of potheads).
     
  9. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    Messages:
    33,965
    Likes Received:
    2,508
    I would really like to see something proving they advocated the "public execution of potheads." That sounds too retarded to be believable. Almost as retarded as believing your friend "blew up" one of their bookstores.

    I don't even care for the John Birch Society, but I have to call you out on something so obviously made-up. Being a potsmoker myself, I find that hard to swallow. Sorry.

    I don't agree with the religious fundamentalism of the far-Right, and I beieve that the JBS has softened up over the years when tackling the real issues. This isn't to say I don't agree with some of the things they have supported over the years.

    Pointbreak, in his pathetic attempt to marginalize me, makes it out to appear that I am a member of the JBS. I am not, have never been, nor ever will. Frankly, I don't believe in organizations tarnished by fundamentalism, religious or otherwise. This goes for both the Right and Left.

    I don't believe in organizations. Period.
     
  10. Pointbreak

    Pointbreak Banned

    Messages:
    1,870
    Likes Received:
    1
    They believed that fluoridation of the water supply was a communist plot (before they, as you put it, "softened up"). Is that too retarded to believe?

    Keep in mind that many of the people whose views you cut and paste into this forum are JBS fans. Yet you try to dissociate yourself from the group even when their views seem to closely mirror your own. Why? Because...
    Yes because that would require you to have actual opinions. Better to stand on the sidelines and criticise everybody else. What's your opinion on gay marriage? "I don't care, I only care about the conspiracy". What's your opinion on the charities like the environmental movement and the red cross? "They're all globalists, I don't support them".
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice