In the scientific context, theory means a well excepted explanation for a series of obsrevations, such as continental drift or the revolution of the planet.
Eveloton is gayer than Elton John. Wait a minite, I don't even care if people are gay, and how can a theory be gay? Eveloon sucks arse though, and I can proove it false. Actually I already did, henceforth this thread is irrelevent.
Also, metaphysics is made up, if you'd like to come up with a specific I'll happily explain to you why its not real.
Also evolution has no religious implacations either way, and anyone who implies otherwise is an idiot who's afraid of evolution disrupting their literal interpretations of the bible. It's fine if you believe in intelligent design working it's way through evolution, but people proposing it as an alternative are a threat to science.
I said if someone came up with a specific aspect of metaphysics. Metaphysics is a very vauge term, and can imply all of theology, and philosophy. Arguing about that would take a lot of time. Time that could be spent touching myself and making a sandwhich. If you want to debate something specific metaphysical, I'll argue aginst it. How about a soul? That wouldn't take long to disprove.
Disproving something in itself is invalid by nature. The term proof exists as making compeling validating proposals about an observance. In its nature, there is no sense that a soul is observable, so it cannot be proven, it remains in the realm of theology. The idea of a soul came around when we started to understand the concept of death. The concept of death was so radical we had to counterbalence it in our minds with the shoking realization that we wouldn't be around anymore. But the fact is, life is what matters, moral desicions are reflected by our personal beliefs and what our societies reflect as moral. After you die, nothing escapes your body thats detectable. 21 grams thing is bullshit, and reflects the muscle tension and oxygen storage in your lungs. There by, if you do believe in a soul, I'm not saying your stupid, but you are beliving in something despite the fact that it's not provable, so its unproven, and in the terms of philosophy, unproven and disproven are identical. Philosophy is so abstract, so there is no proof for anything. By its very nature it's disproven in a literal context because theres no proof for philosophy.
I'd tell you, but it might be too sexy for you. It's not often enough anyway. It's a shame I don't make enough time for myself. I mean, 'tis the season.
Wow, Jesus played soccer - I never knew! Just don't tell me he played hockey because they didn't have much snow - unless it's an interior ring...
Last time I checked they've been calling gravity a law for centuries, and they keep on tweaking how and why it works as new evidence comes about. Wether you call it law or theory it dosn't change how the scientific process works.
Evuton isn't a science any more than that story where the raindears fly around the world. It's just a story made up by a guy with too much time on his hands.
Yes, it makes much more sense that people were swallowed by whales and didn't get digested.....or that a guy walked on water without being in a music video....
A guy actually got swallowed by wale in modren times. And Jesus make the water and the rules concerning the physics of water so he can do what he wants with it.