1. The Hipforums announces it first ever fundraiser. After nearly 30 years online, we must ask our members and guests to help support the website. Thanks to years of ongoing financial support of our members, advertisers and volunteer admin staff, we have been able to keep the forums alive.

    Now we must ask for help as available funds have all been used for our Internet server and other fees.

    So please donate any amount to our PayPal account donate@Hipforum.com to keep the site going. If we can get enough for a few months fees, we won't need to nag you again!

    You could also subscribe to the forums and get an upgrade to Supporter or Lifetime Supporter here

    You can dismiss this message by clicking on the X in the upper right corner.

    Thanks! The Hipforums Staff
    Dismiss Notice

science question - sensation and perception

Discussion in 'Random Thoughts' started by sheeprooter, Sep 6, 2005.

  1. sheeprooter

    sheeprooter Member

    Messages:
    593
    Likes Received:
    0
    what is the difference between an invariant and a cue?

    I know that most of you have no idea what that means, but i have an exam in a few days and this is one of the two essay questions. I'm always surprised by how knowledgeable forum ppl tend to be, so i figured hey, its worth a shot
     
  2. invariant = real, cue = something that you pick up


    like for instance, a tree is invariant, you percieve that it is there because it is there

    a cue is something that surrounds something (when eskimoes go fishing they don't look for fish they look for birds, birds = cue)

    that's what I think, could be totally wrong, but hey, why not take a shot at it, worst that happens is I'm wrong and someone else gives you the right answer
     
  3. Death

    Death Grim Reaper Lifetime Supporter

    Messages:
    16,214
    Likes Received:
    295
    The perception of shape is independent of the size and position of the shape and also of the visual cue that defines it. The same shape can be recognized whether defined by a difference in luminance, by motion, or by texture. Experiments showed that the shape selectivity of individual cells in the macaque inferior temporal cortex did not vary with the size and position of a shape and also did not vary with the visual cue used to define the shape. This cue invariance was true for static luminance and texture cues as well as for relative motion cues--that is, for cues that are processed in ventral and dorsal visual pathways. The properties of these inferior temporal cells meet the demands of cue-invariant shape coding.
     
  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice