What If human society was a female dominated one?

Would everything work in reverse? Would we have a mascuilinist movement instead of feminist one? How would wars be fought (if they are fought)?

 

there would be a lot more combat, I promise you.........


(Ask me about piggies if you do not believe.....)

 

Then there would be no men because all funds would go towards asexual reproduction research.

 

yes, but it will be some time until asexual reproduction is discovered.

 

HAHA!
True, Pavel.

 

It is already discovered. And would have been discovered much earlier if it was convenient. It is not convenient for men.

 

yes, buy I don't think that will be beneficial once it is done... Male and female minds have different expertises and domains, and both must be preserved... but one must be subservient and one dominant. In this Alternate word, the females dominate the males.

And what happens when asexual reproduction is discovered? Feminazi concentration camps?

 

Men can then be kept as pets. Lesbianism dominates, and women can pleasure themselves. OR men are flat out eliminated. The females do not need males to be dominant over, they can create thier own inter-sexual class hierchy.

 

yeah, I think women prefer to keep us as pets and servants rather than eliminating us all together

 

It all depends on how fast females expand. If the earth runs out of space, men will be the first to go.

 

......I could live as a pet as long as I got laid and fed and I got paper and pens.......


my needs are few.......


I am totally kidding


but women would wipe themselves out if they were the only ones left, you can't keep two female pigs together unless they have a very docile personality because pigs are matriarchal, male dogs you can keep together even though they are patriarchal..... wonder why........

 

True.

 

Every society is bound to destroy itself eventually. We do not know how many human societies have already lived on this planet; only destroying themselves... and so on. Destruction is something both sexes are very much capable of.

 

All the talk about men being better than women and women not needing men to survive.

I see both the sexes are equal. Men need women just like women need men. It's that simple, not just for reproduction. If women ran the world, it would exist the same. A woman could be stubborn and stupid like George Bush, a sadistic murderer like Saddam or a humanitarian like Mandela. Regardless of sex, all traits that exist are in both men and women. I don't believe the world would be better off, maybe different but with complications of it's own.

 

yes, but some things are female strengths and some virtues are decidedly female virtues... what if these strenghts were allowed to dominate?

 

2 women fight someone tries to step in to break it up that poor bastard gets brought in...


2 men fight, someone tries to break it up, they ignore that person and try to kick each others asses......


there is a different dynamic.......


I personally think women are more violent despite long held stereotypes.....

 

I think some women get too caught up in feminism. The statements about women being stronger, not needing an man, i would hate to think what things would evaporate if a feminist way of thinking was in charge. No offence, but i don't mind having a male dominated world. I still have my part to play and my voice and freedom.

 

Can't say I've a problem with feminism, the idea of one sex being dominate disturbs me (any one considering that to be the feminist agenda is woefully ignorant of the cause)
There are I believe some female dominated societies. The lot of men is about that of women in a male dominated society at such a level of evolution. So can't see there would be much diffrence.

Amen to that

We've had a male dominated society for thousands of years, and it has been a sorry state of affairs, especially for women.
Am not going to apologise for fighting my corner and showing gratitude for the efforts made those to improve the lifes and rights of women. So yeah I'm a feminist, oh dear.

 

wars would occur once a month, each lasting roughly 5 days. they would be brutal and bloody.

 

At the end of the day, it's all about the advisors a leader has behind them. That's what makes the true difference. If leaders had to fend for themselves, they would fall in a heap. Can you imagine if Bush was doing it on his own? Although, it's hard to imagine him more of a distaster.