I'm not sure about Batman's toys not being lethal...I reckon that they could be, if he chose to weild them in a lethal fashion. The bat boomerang thing he uses always seemed like a pretty nasty thing. If he aimed for Bond's neck rather than his hand (to disable his weapon handling), I think it could strike a fatal blow.
Batman's may be intended to kill as well, should the situation he's in require it. I dunno, I'm just trying to play devil's advocate Although I guess you're right, in the way that even if Batman gained the upper hand, he'd simply incapacitate Bond and then leave him. While Batman walks away, Bond would invariably regain his senses and take Batman out from behind.
Depends which Batman suit he's wearing. That experimental one he wears in Batman Forever or whatever it is probably has enough armour to deflect the darts.
Interesting thought, Newo...but if we account for the different James Bonds, we'd also have to account for the different versions of Batman over the years. What do you think of 60s TV show Batman's chances? ps: this seems the perfect place to post this
i have to say that i'm not into batman or james bond because they are both annoyingly cocky, batman less so though, therefor he'd be more likely to win.
Well they are both obviously gay so I reckon they'd do a fair bit of slapping and then that'd lead on to full penetrative sex.
batman is the more physical out of the two,in a full on ruck he'd do well,but bond aint no pushover ,he'll have a few moves up his sleeve,but since im thinking more of the comic batman ,who can take out gangs of lower level bad guys in one fight ,i egde batman,,maybe,,,,umm,,,it doesnt matter cos spiderman would have em both at he same time!but to be fair he's more mutated,,,arggh thall do lol