There needs to be a medium between these two sides. Not allowing midwives at all limits womyn's choices, and cuts off very good health care for many womyn. Allowing anyone who wants, no matter what their education and training to call themselves a midwife, is as dangerous as hell. Midwives, whether nurses or direct entry, should be trained, educated, given hands on learning and certification or licsensure. THIS would make childbirth safer than either outlawing midwivery totally, or letting anyone who wants practice it, without training or education.
I live in IL. There are unlicensed, non-nurse midwives practicing here. I have had a few clients who have used them. I don't recommend people who don't have certification or licensure to anyone. I had a client whose "midwife" fled a birth where the placenta wouldn't deliver. The parents were forced to go to a local hospital, and it took more than a year to get a birth certificate for the baby, as the "midwife" (who, from what I saw from the baby missed a InterUnterine Growth Restriction (baby was WAY too small, and preterm like for her dates,) and a severe sucking disorder in the baby, as well as couldn't handle a stubborn placental birth.) The midwife told the parents not to tell the hospital she did the delivery, and the hospital knew something was wrong and DCFS got involved, and they couldn't get ahold of the licenced midwife who had left the unlicenced one in charge while she was on vacation, and neither would sign a birth certificate. It was a mess. (As was my client, from loss of blood, and her baby, from an undiagnosed growth restriction.) Luckily, most of the midwives I know, whether nurse or direct entry, are very responsible (would never leave a womyn in labor or in distress) very capable and wonderful people.