Would you give up being able to eat, in exchange for not needing to?

If not needing to eat means no "hunger pains" I'd give up the ability to eat. Otherwise I'll keep it just how it is.

 

hell no!! I love to eat!

 

Eating is mostly an inconvenience...

I can still get drunk right?

 

people, you only love to eat because youre hungry and it satisfies your tastebuds/hunger. Think about this question when youre not hungry, then answer it. If your not hungry, you dont desire food, simple as that.

 

food still tastes good when yer not hungry

i take it youve never gourged yourself while under the influence of the munchies

 

i have, but im usually hungry when i get the munchies. It may still taste good when youre not hungry, but isnt it a hastle to be chomping up and down just for the sake of taste when youre not hungry? maybe im just lazy.

 

I could never do that.... I love food way too much

 

hahaha
if you never got the munchies and ate
you would stay high forever
eating weighs down the body
not needing to eat is spiritual enlightenment and saves lives

 

hell yes!


I can't explain to you how much I abhor the chore of eating everyday. It's fucking annoying as a matter of fact I was daydreaming this morning about going to the doctor and telling them that I would like to not have to eat anymore, and that I would do would be to drink juice. If I didn't have to eat, I would occasionally eat things just for fun like chips and salsa, my favorite snack, but my life would be so much easier.

 

Sure, I'd go without food if I didn't need it. It would make life a lot easier. Sometimes things get so hectic that I have to remind myself to sit down and eat, and no meals to prepare or clean-up afterwards would be wonderful. Plus I wouldn't be obsessing over every bite of food I ate like I do now.

 

I was thinking about this over night, and I don't think I could give up the ability to eat. I really do enjoy it. It's needing to eat and not being able to that pisses me off.