This isn't about policy, murder, conflict of interest, or anything like that. All I'm saying is, we didn't have quadruple hurricanes, level 3 snow emergencies in my town, or tsunamis under Clinton.
Well you're right about the natural disasters, but no way no how is ol' Dubya smart enough to be the devil.
I only realised this a few months ago... George Bush Jr and Tony Blair are two of the most progressive and helpful leaders the world has seen this century. I swear.. it took me years and years to see this but it finally dawned on me those two are the good guys on this planet! Very Good. As for Bush.. I think the man might have been right all along about this whole Iraq thing. Surprise!
It dawned on me that Blair and Bush honestly believe they can make the world a better safer place. They intend to do good and right things to benefit the world. Im not saying it is gonna work.. I just realised that is what they are attempting to do.
Yeah, well Hitler thought that he was making the world a better safer place too, he did what he though was good and right. So go chew on that for awhile.
Bush is definitely a Satanist, but I don't think he's the Antichrist. Perhaps the precursor to the Antichrist, but not the devil himself.
Ya mean kind of like an Anti John-the-Basptist? That would be neat if there was one of those. Luke 3:4 talks about John the Baptist saying As it is written in the book of the words of Esaias the prophet, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, make his paths straight. Maybe an anti John the Baptist would be As the voice of one crying in the wilderness, prepare ye the way of the Devil, make his paths all crookedy and fucked up.
Chewing, chewing.. Yes and Winston Churchill thought he was making the world better. He was and did. (now you chew a bit) As for Bush and Blair's intentions of making the world safer and better - it seems to be working. Iraq seems about ready to go from bloodiest torturing, genociding Kill-State in the world......... to pretty darn decent democracy. Afganistan is now a 'Normal' country instead of a sicko wierd Religious Cult of Death. Did you see those youth in Lebanon!? Inspired by the Ukraine yes.. but now they can feel safe enough to do that, knowing Iraq is next door. Did you see Iran actually entering into 'normal' talks with the West.. its almost like they are acting like normal nations instead of an insane Jihad cabal. I can almost begin to see a day coming when it will be normal and even routine for westerners to visit Arab nations for business and tourism. I dont know how anyone could look at the election day footage from Iraq and not be elated at how much better things are now! can you chew on that? [here comes all the bullshit 'what about' exceptions and wild allegation I guess?]
It would seem then that one's intentions are not a reliable standard on which to determine the correctness of one's actions; as generally (but not necessarily specifically) similar intentions may yield greatly variant outcomes. Umm. . . Where having you been getting your news? Perhaps the RNC? Saddam was an astoundingly nasty brutal bloody tyrant, but there are numerous regimes in the world today far worse than Saddam was. The Sudanese government is worse, the North Korean government is worse, the Congo is a total mess, Columbia is just as bad as the Congo, all sorts of places are as bad or worse than Iraq was under Saddam. If Bush and Blair were genuinely interested in promoting democray and ending tyranny they would have come down on these nations just as hard as they came down on Saddam. Yet with the partial exception of North Korea, Bush has completely ignored all international requests for aid in ending tyranny and oppression in those regions. The Bush administration is actually opposed to any kind of U.N. or international action whatsoever to end the genocide in Sudan. Bush has of course denounced that genocide and publically called for an end to it, but his actions tell a different story. In Iraq they elected an impotent assembly that will appoint officials who will then appoint other officials who constitute a temporary government and will then draft a constitution which, amoung other things, will lay out election law and procedure. Then they will have another election to electe officials to appoint the real government, big deal this is not progress it is propaganda. Furthermore, more people are killed per-day in Iraq now than under Saddam; if we add to that that now they have little food, little clean water, no proper health care, and poor or non-existent education it seems that things are not much better now than before. Well Afghanistan is quite alot better, though one big difference here is that there was real justification for invading Afghanistan. I would not, however, call Afghanistan a "normal" country seeing as how 95% of it (basically all territory outside the major cities) is under the controll of regional warlords. Knowing Iraq is next door? What is that supposed to mean? Anyhow, Bush and Blair taking cerdit for what happened in Ukraine and Lebanon would be like a rooster taking cerdit for the sun coming up. If that same thing happens in Iraq then they get the credit, but it hasn't happened there. Instead they are murdering each other at an absolutely alarming rate. Yes I did see that. I also saw than Iran only agreed to enter into such talks once Bush and Blair abandoned their policy of threats of preemptive war and began using the approach that "Old Eurpoe" had been advocating all along. So can I, and it won't be because we indaved their countries, "blew up every good target"-Donald Rumsfeld and gave all of their natural resources to Haliburton. Well Whoopdy-dooo. Merely having elections means nothing. Iraq had elections under Saddam and guess what, Saddam got 100% of the vote. The Saddam elections were propaganda bullshit. While the recent elections are a far cry from the bullshit that were the Saddam elections they are still meaningless if they do not result in the election of a capable and soverign governemnt. Bush and Blair would do well to heed the old idiom "actions speak louder than words". Sure Dubya talks a good show about supporting liberty, freedom, and democracy but so far his actions have show an attitude of apathy towards such principles. He is on the right track regarding Syria and Lebanon, and he supported the right side in the right way in Ukraine. It is a good sign that he has given up his all too hawkish stance on Iran and has decided to work with Europe instead of against it on that issue. However much of a good thing these positions might be they are preceeded by four years of violent war-mongering on the part or our buddy Bush. He will need to do more to change my opinion of him.
The real issue in the Middle East isn't a particular regime, it's the spread of Anti-American sentiment caused by American foreign policy that dates back to the cold war. After beating the USSR, the Mujahaddin (sp?) evolved into various spin-offs such as the Taliban and Wahhabis. As America gives financial backing to Israel, the highly unpopular Saudi royal family, and now invades Middle Eastern countries at random. None of this seems conducive to stability, much less peace.
I know. Why didn't Bush do anything about the Sudanese crisis and the drug monopoly in Colombia. at least he saw that you don't have to wipe everything out to make progress with Iran's nuclear program. but if you have the option to save a country with black gold in it vs. a country with just a lot of sand and death in it, i could see how the conservatives would pick a country with something in it. i just wish for once the right-wingers could stop seeing people as heterosexuals and homosexuals and start seeing people as human beings.
You got me! Good one, man. That's the kind of razor wit that can only be attained if one's mother happens to share lineage with a farm animal.
Yeah i came to that realisation myself , it is not only them though.. I don't think the world just germany..and if he had not been a rascist fascist murdering bastard .. he could of been given a nobel prize..
