Actively promoting and supporting the concept that a significant percentage of children have a "disease" which required narcotic treatment/therapy; Actively promoting Ritalin as the "drug of choice" to treat children diagnosed with ADD and ADHD: Actively supporting groups such as defendant CHADD, both financially and with other means, so that such organizations would promote and support (as a supposed neutral party) the ever-increasing implementation of ADD/ADHD diagnoses as well as directly increasing Ritalin sales; Distributing misleading sales and promotional literature to parents, schools and other interested persons in a successful effort to further increase the number of diagnoses and the number of persons prescribed Ritalin. And when the "side" effects of the ritalin and adderal pile up the pharmaceutical giants spend billions a year to get doctors to prescribe even more drugs to American kids. Johnson & Johnson even passes out Legos advertising its latest anti-psychotic, ignoring mounting evidence that the drug causes diabetes, wild weight gain, and grows breasts in boys and girls who take it. Their solution? More pills These dirtbags even put legos stamped with "Risperdal" into pediatricians offices! How did they test Risperdal on children ? “You need some medicine to help you get back in control. Take this medicine or we may have to give you a shot.” In the results of the trial, Dr Carlson reports that all but one child agreed to take the medication. This is hardly surprising given they were threatened with an injection if they refused. Agreement obtained through the use of threats and coercion is identified in the domestic violence literature as a classic tactic of an abuser and in the law as not constituting consent. Children are scared of injections. They hurt. Of course children will choose to drink a drug rather than be injected with one. Dr Carlson could have achieved the same results if she had told the children that if they didn’t take their drug she would punch them. A rage outburst was defined as sufficient agitation and loss of control such that the child was unable to “time out” (i.e. sit in a chair for 10 minutes on being told to do so) or was a danger to himself or others and a higher level of intervention was needed. Note the ‘or’ in that sentence. Risperidone was not being used as a chemical restraint only in circumstances where the child was at risk of harming themselves or others but also where the child was unable to sit in a chair for 10 minutes. Read More Threats, Coercion and Chemical Restraints for Distressed Children Yep Murray says he developed breasts after he began taking Risperdal in 2003 soon after a school psychologist diagnosed him with autism spectrum disorder ... The Boys Who Grew Breasts: Portraits of the Effects of Risperdal The Boys Who Grew Breasts: Portraits of the Effects of Risperdal
You claim that "schools and shrinks go after weaker families who can't fight back so easy." Yet according to the report you cite no schools were involved and only one pediatrician. In addition all of the families involved gave permission. These types of children were normally treated by seclusion, restraint, or a few by injections of diphenydramine, droperidol, and ziprasidone. In other words the children had to be "isolated", tied down, or injected to prevent harm to themselves or others. The study was meant to find a more human way of treatment, by oral dosage. If the dosage was refused then one of the previous methods of treatment could come into play. The first instance of rage resulted in seclusion in a room with the door open or closed depending on the severity. The second episode resulted in asking the child to take the oral dosage, if they refused they were told, “You need some medicine to help you get back in control. Take this medicine or we may have to give you a shot”. You seem to be upset because the children were told they may get a shot if they didn't take the oral dose. Probably "snowflakes". The other alternative was seclusion, or restraint, as agreed upon by their parents. Which of the four was worse? Next you seem to think this study was done with the goal of selling a drug to unsuspecting weaker families who can't fight back so easy. But everyone agreed to the study. Maybe Dr Gabrielle Carlson was looking for a way to help children.
So was Josef Rudolf Mengele The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion, and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. Nuremberg Code - UNC Research At least read the risperdal story, what criminals these people were. America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker Maybe you can defend them too. The children did not want to be there but you tell me the parents said its okay but when parents don't they use foster children for medical experiments Panel Examines Protections for Foster Children Enrolled in Clinical Trials - Women's Congressional Policy Institute So after Kamala sends the cops to the parents houses and puts them in jail kids are sent off to be drugged Drugging Our Kids: Part 6: The Drug Docs But everyone has "good intentions" so all the suffering in their wake is just happy accidents. Okay sure.
Just face it you lose. You thought I was going to parrot Trumper stuff when I called out the schools and weren't ready for this.
Violates the Nuremberg Code participated in the risperdal atrocity that ruined alot of lives. Did she ever apologize to those kids ?
It’s like giggle giggle smile wave” I’m Kamala and I’m all that he’s a convict so vote for me and freedom will live on”giggle giggle smile.
Oh yes---it makes soo much more sense to vote for an honest gentleman like---well you know who. ( the name burns my mouth)
I don’t think anyone of the R persuasion is in any position to throw stones given the orange, “fake” haired infant the Kool-aid drinkers are so enamored of. Course they love being the moral gestapo for families of candidates.
Hillary Clinton 2016, Jo Jorgensen 2020 and the no primary DNC appointed Kamala Harris 2024. I voted Jo Jorgensen 2020 cause Biden was the architect of mass incarceration and Trumps a total bootlicker. — Aug 24, 2016 It's been 263 days since Hillary Clinton last held a press ... I don't want to hear it. I already voted for a lady president. Why Can't Harris sit down and do interviews? Its obnoxious just hiding out like that. RKJ JR gets the vote this time. I just don't like Ds and Rs. Its like voting for CNN or Fox News, no thanks ! I hate those news channels.