I couldn't have said it better myself! I mean here you are with the grand prize, so why would you want to give any part of it away in the first place? Not to mention what you'd be doing to this particular lady, as you say!
I know you agreed with me curiousfellow so I've no real beef with you but, I think, it's worth highlighting a difference between your first point and the second. 1. Holding on to a so-called 'grand prize' is like holding a trophy and not sharing. (no appreciation for the women in the photos or her privacy, not to mention the having of no respect for her or her privacy or that of her body). 2. 'Not to mention what you'd be doing to this lady'.... That's what many guys seem oblivious to. I think many just don't care - pondlife - in other words. The trauma to be experienced by women when they are betrayed in such a way is horrible. Horrible to see, though I can't even begin to imagine the trauma they feel as the betrayed person, with her most intimate parts displayed in the way tiktok videos are spread about - as commodities - without the slightest thought about where, or how, they were acquired. The term deplorable doesn't even come close. And that - seeing without questioning - brings me back to the other thread about whether humans are becoming dumber. Some are already dumb and on a downward slide, others are dumb but recoverable and some are clever, knowledge absorbing and able to learn more and gain wisdom. I hope the term 'silent majority' prevails.
Not looking at it, as a trophy and not what I meant by that #1 statement and for maybe not putting my thoughts across properly. What I meant by the grand prize was for her having shared this moment with me and for something I should treasure like a gift and for not ever giving it away. No re-gifting in these cases, as per say.
I got you the first time curiousfellow And maybe I'm going off one one (slightly) here but... For me; I imagine, it was partly because the women I photographed were either referred to me by someone I already knew, or they were referred to me by another woman whom I had photographed after they were referred to me by someone I knew. I took time to discuss what they would like me to photograph and also I tried to ensure they would not do something they later might regret. To avoid regret was a biggy for me. None was worried about doing something they may regret. The only concern was the camera footage. One actually said she was wiling to do everything I had done with others, including sex, as long as the camera wasn't there. Were they worried that I might share? Nope. Were they worried the images might end up on the Internet; initially one was. She was a teacher and if they were online, her career could be over. Was she worried I would allow them to get online? Initially yes but when I showed her what I do to ensure they are offline only, and I showed her the whole process, she was OK. There was other stuff I did to alleviate concerns, which helped, but I shan't mention them here in case others may use them with ulterior motives. And when they began the process, they were very relaxed and really did let themselves go, moreso than any girlfriend I have known. And I videoed their progress towards (and including) orgasm. Afterwards; I showed them the result and, although most weren't all keen to watch, they were very willing to let me keep them. And keep them private; I will! Perhaps not explained well but, because they were relaxed and trusted me, they went much further than they envisioned. I think much further than they have done with their husband or partner. That really is a privileged position to be allowed into so; how on earth could any man consider sharing them or worse, putting them online?! I treasure them; the women, the photos and the videos and I continue to meet them for coffee - the actual drink not euphamism - some as much as 10 yrs later. One thing that bugs me about current technology; We guys are all randoms. We could be anyone. There's no real way to stand out as good or bad such that we all look dodgy. I'd love to build a rapport with women and to look at them intimately. I can't go all over the world to photograph them for real and I don't seem to be able to find a way to assure any of them that I am protective. However, if I could reassure them, remotely, that I am one of the good guys, I would be awash with the pleasure; not just of having looked at them intimately but because they allowed me in to that ever so personal space in their emotions. I guess the difference may be that some guys take photos for instant gratification without consideration for the person (or the emotions of the person) being photographed. And some guys - such as me - photograph human art; The beauty of the female body (regardless of shape or size) and the wonder that is, their expressions of their feelings up to and through orgasm.
I just needed to share that with someone I can't keep it to myself any longer. I want to share the pic so badly but she's a teacher and there's a chance however infinitesimal that a student may see it and she'd be horrified so I won't. I mean it could very likely be marriage ending the potential cost is just too high. I think she'd be pretty pissed off if she knew I'd taken them even without sharing them. Have you done this or how would you feel if you found out your partner had done this?[/QUOTE ] Not without a signed model release form. This violates so many basic trust tenets.
I've taken nude pics of my spouse and she of me. Mostly of me. Not without permission though. A lot of the pictures were done before digital cameras and smart phones existed. The film had to either be sent off or taken to the drug store to be developed. One time as I was picking up the latest I was warned by the manager to be careful with a wry smile on her face as she handed me the package. From then on I made sure she was the one who took the film from me. I don't mind nude pics being taken. Just let me know you are doing it and give me the right to refuse sharing any. I do know there is at least one nude of me out there somewhere hanging on a wall, maybe. Years ago a friend asked me to pose for her art project. One was hung in the local university's art department museum. My friend ended up selling the photo. I took a selfie a while back when out for a nude hike. You can see it there to the left as my avatar.
Never taken any sneaky nudes. However, i've taken many selfies for past girlfriends and received many back in return, all consensual and never shared. With the exception of one time. I was seeing two females, one said I could share her pictures woth the other girl in hopes of a threesome. Shortly afterwards I was single! There's a message there somewhere you can't have you cale and eat it!
Obviously, the other girl considered the photos very impressive so there was no need for the threesome and you were left out. Given that one meaning of Cale is 'loyalty and love'; I wonder if you meant that ironically or the 'puter put an L in there (Cale), instead of K (cake)? lol
I've always thought the saying was ridiculous. Why have cake when you can't eat it. I get a piece of cake I will eat it. Silly saying that doesn't make a bit of sense.
It makes sense alright. It'd just being said, sorta backwards with ..... you can't have your cake and eat it too......meaning that you can't eat your cake and for still having it.....
I can...... Jane and both our daughters love baking, so their are tins full of cakes everywhere. The only problem is having to vary them, to avoid starting WW3
I do the same sometimes. That is secretly take a snap shot. My wife hates social media and always thinks the private photos will get out. I've learned to silence my clicker on my phone.
I have a few nude and semi-pics of women I know on my phone, but I’ll never share them. They put too much trust in me and I’ll never betray them.
Thanks for mentioning that. I damaged my phone about six months ago and never put my private app of pictures on this knew one. Sure hope I can remember the name of it and the password. Lol
I have posted nude pictures of myself but no wife pictures to post but I do not think I would post if could.