Why does everyone believe in conspiracy theories nowadays?

Hmm...did I miss your explanation of how Hitler used the term exterminate?

 

Ah, but they were. Article III of the Constitution. The Supreme Court and other federal courts were created--as a separate, independent branch, not one subservient to Congress. Federalist 78: it's the job of the courts to interpret law. And as you've said, the Constitution is fundamental law. By leaving the matter to interpretation, as the Framers did with so many things, they made it necessary for somebody to give a definitive interpretation, and the logical body to do that was the Courts.

It was never the plan of the Framers to get "the people" involved in the process, if that means some kind of referendum. The Framers deplored Greek-style direct democracy. The only role for popular participation in such matters was indirect, through elections of representatives and the process of constitutional amendment.

Anyhow, that's how history decided the matter, and to try to turn back the clock is as futile and ridiculous as saying we should go back to Egyptian theocracy (which seems to be another of your bright ideas. Not gonna happen.

 

No, it's an admission of how things actually work, which is good enough for me. I don't feel that I'm groaning under the yoke of tyranny, or that our system is inferior to most in the world today. And I certainly don't think it would be improved by anarchy or Egyptian-style theocracy.

 

Hmmm. Did I miss the part where this issue even came up?

 

well then consider it came up: how did Hitler use the term exterminate?

 

They are not independent, the same place pays their check and the same place puts them in office. Independent as human resources is from Microsoft!

Hmm it seems you are wrong again!

This independence of the judges is equally requisite to guard the Constitution and the rights of individuals from the effects of those ill humors

that fundamental principle of republican government, which admits the right of the people to alter or abolish the established Constitution

Until the people have, by some solemn and authoritative act, annulled or changed the established form, it is binding upon themselves collectively, as well as individually; and no presumption, or even knowledge, of their sentiments, can warrant their representatives in a departure from it, prior to such an act.


So do you need this: the right of the people to alter or abolish the established Constitution Explained to you?

Id say that qualifies as proof the people are supposed to be involved.

Yes you choose your new club america dictators.

ah huh, they chose to burn the constitution wherever they could get away with it depending on apoligists to justify their despotism.

Which is proof of despotism.

I see that.

If you are a masochist and enjoy being a lab rat for their profit based experiments.

This is not about comparing it to other countries, this is about the con law, this country, what is compared to what it was intended to be and is not because we have a hard working kleptocracy at the helm.

Not the way you understand it, the way 'you' understand it I agree.

 

It means just because a legal theory is enacted as a law does not change the fact it is and forever will be a legal theory.

Deeming doesnt make it so.

Yes a bogus law/(amendment), passed under bogus pretense, at least they corrected their error.

false, all laws are CLAIMED to be constitutional when they are passed, that does not make it so, you just proved that.

Yep pot, the civil war abolished state sovereignty. Now we are one big unconstitutional unhappy family.

Our rights do not originate from any state or federal grants, the only thing the state or fed can grant 'technically' is privileges and immunities. However they can and do constantly take away your rights at the business end of a barrel of a gun.

 

So then they ceased to be Jew? really?

AFAIK most of them were already in the armed forces, you dont get to be generals in one year.

Do you have any affidavits of those or is it all made up?

Again affidavits?
I had no idea there were any 'death' camps, was that like sign on the front gate, welcome to the death camp, or is it some over the top dramatization?

huh? cannon fodder?
Ive seen no orders to that effect.

Well the first thing you need to do is tell us 'which' Holocaust?



can we like throw a dart?

you understand that I dont want to assume anything here right?

Oh and what did Hitler mean when he used the word exterminate again?

 

What subject?
Sure if Hitler hated Jews then he must have been a self hating Jew too.
140000+ Jews in his army?
Doesnt add up...

 

Oh?
I have never seen any evidence that Jews were executed in gas chambers, do you have any?

I forget the university, I posted the accreditations.

 

Wow a complete usurping of power by the federal government and all you have to say for that is whatever?
Same for our rights? Whatever? wow!

a law, or an amendment?
the only law that attaches to the constitution is an amendment

 

They hoped to be more acceptable Jews. As was true in South African apartheid, they occupied a distinct racial classification. In South Africa, it was "Coloured". In Nazi Germany, it was Mischlinge. There were so many of those it was impractical to put them all into concentration camps. You told me to do my homework. Do yours! Hmm it seems you are wrong again!

 

It's incomprehensible why some obviously smart people would act dumb on occasion.