Kyle Rittenhouse video and audio analysis clearly shows...

Biracial man charged with fatally shooting White teen was acting in self-defense, attorney says

 

As I understand it the judge ruled that under Wisconsin law Rittnehouse was permitted to carry an assault weapon, while under age, if he was hunting. The judge ruled he was hunting, what I don't know.

I agree the prosecution did a poor job, but they were greatly hampered by the judge. Rittenhouse at the least was irresponsible and reckless resulting in the deaths.

 

Well, that's one take on it.
It could also mean that if you see an active shooter, who has not rendered aid to the one shot, who has not surrendered his, or her, weapon, has not called for help, dialed 911, or shown any remorse at all and you believe that person may shoot someone else you should not try and stop them from shooting someone else. As we all know the pro gun lobby wants more people to have guns for just such situations, if you see someone get shot you should have a gun on hand to shoot back, but when we see that Gaige Grosskreutz produced a gun becasue he believed there was an active shooter roaming around...which there was...he was the attacker not the shooter.

Moral #1
Right wing conservative with a gun = good.
Left wing liberal with a gun = bad.

Moral #2
Right wing conservative bringing a gun to a protest, or riot for that matter = good.
Left wing liberal bringing a gun to a protest, or riot for that matter = bad.

I predict more radicals both right and left showing up at protests, which are guaranteed by the Constitution, with arms and body armor. The intent will be intimidation and more violence will result due to this ruling. Rittenhouse should have at least been found guilty of reckless endangerment and curfew violation.

 

I never said he was shot in the back while on the ground, that was someone else. I merely posted the medical examiner's testimony. He was shot in the back and that shot was lethal. As you point out he was shot four times in rapid succession, the last shot to the back as he was falling toward the ground due to the first three shots.
After being shot in the hand, groin, and thigh with three high velocity full metal jacket bullets from an AR 15 at close range, I don't think the kill shot was necessary.
If you remember Gaige Grosskreutz was incapacitated by a single shot which vaporized his bicep. And that was one shot only. A single shot to Joseph Rosenbaum would have stopped him as well. Rittenhouse panicked and unloaded four rounds into an unarmed man. Period.

Neither of the two men had to die, if Rittenhouse hadn't brought the gun, hadn't chosen to walk alone in a dangerous environment, hadn't panicked, had stayed near police officers, no one would have died. He was found innocent which merely points out that the prosecution was hampered and the laws out dated.
This ruling will not be good for further protests....which are legal by the way.