The Intelligence of Republicans !!!

He was on the news a few years ago claiming he still had her Little Black Book. Then all news on him stopped. It is strange if you was to ask me? That book had lots of Washington names and phone numbers in it, did it not?.

 

We are unlikely to ever know for sure, but I find it highly improbable that someone who knew too much conveniently commited suicide. Things like this always seem to happen to those who fail to release all of their information. Once said information has been released and all the players exposed, there is only one reason to make someone "disappear", and that is revenge.

Her attorney started releasing info back in 2016, but only about 174 "entities" out of tens of thousands. I'm thinking that, if that dumb $h!t doesn't release EVERYTHING immediately, he will also "epstein" on us. I'd have put that info out in the public domain immediately before the judge could issue any orders. Copies to Julian Assange, and anyone else with a BBS or forum. Other copies hidden like timebombs so they'd go public regularly. I'm tired of people expending so much effort to protect these jerks. You'd think they were annointed or something. Most judges already seem to think and act that way about themselves.

 

While it doesn't really prove penetration, it does, when coupled with his lies regarding "that woman", cast a long, dark shadow an his integrity. What it DOES prove is that he pulled out of her and shot it on her dress. What he pulled out of can only be proven by determining whether her saliva or vaginal fluids are mingled with it, and I've never seen any information regarding that.

But my, what a long body count those Clintons have associated with them....

 

wonder where the blue dress is ?

 

I kinda think theyre real.....

 

If only the Dems could apply this logic to themselves, regarding Trump.

 

so quick to defend the Clintons...you know the beast has to appear in court under oath for questions from Judicial Watch

 

Bill Clinton was no a good man, considering what he did with extra-marital shenanigans. I wouldn't vote for him today. Concerning the long trail with a body count, that's all BS. including the fake film on Mena Arkansas and the Vince Foster death. The Republican heavy hitter who funded these videos about Clinton is now a Trump supporter. So, when a Democrat does something wrong, I would be the first to speak up. When a Republican does something wrong, you need to pony up.

 

No this is not true and it if were you are admiring you follow a low bar.

If Obama is the worst president ever (as many Trmpers thnk) why is it ok to do ANYTHING he did? Either way your statement makes no sense. Two wrongs don't make a right.

You did not really respond to any of my points. If that is because I worded them wrong of you havbe no counter point I don't know. I think you will find I said I was OK with Apu but was willing to hear the side of those offended since I'm not Indian

 

It seems to be a matter of policy, scale,and semantics. Trump adopted a policy of prosecuting asylum seekers and parents, separating children from their parents, and putting them in chain-link enclosures. Trump's"zero tolerance" policy resulted in family separations. Obama was designed to deal with a sudden influx of unaccompanied children (mostly adolescents) in 2014. Many of those chain link structures were built under his watch to prevent children awaiting a hearing from being let loose on the streets. Whether or not these are cages is a semantic matter. A "cage" is "(a) barred room or fenced enclosure for confining prisoners".cage If such structures used by Trump are "cages", they were under Obama, as well. Does the distinction between family separation and housing unaccompanied minors make a difference? I think so.

 

I think so too. Obama was different because of the treatment people got. There is detaining and there is torture. Sadly the modern border patrol culture is torture. People are drawn to the job because they exist in a world of no rules vs people they see as the source problems in society. I think even Trump voters would admit you don't do that job if you think like me. You do it because you want to hurt the people who "hurt" your country. Same thing happens in prisons. The fun for the guard is that he does not have to be nice like a cop. No body cam, and everyone believes his story over the inmate. The kids in the cages are seen as inmates. Who cares if their feelings are hurt? They should not have done a bad thing.

That's a sad culture to endorse. If we really did not want them here and we wanted to get rid of them in the most cost effective way we would drive them over the border of Mexico and say "you don't have to stay here but you can't come back". We used to do that and it's what made Trumpers so angry because there is no punishment. So despite their claims of small government and low costs they want big government and tax dollars to punish. That is what I don't agree with.

Any evangelical should be ashamed. Where in the Bible does Jesus say it's OK to hurt kids? Orange messiah is bigger than Jesus. Jesus is a brown skinned free loading socialist who did not even speak English. He has no place in the modern Republican party.

 

It's still an artificially-contrived media weapon that served to "raise awareness" about something that is to be expected when people overwhelm an immigration system by force.

Also, the "separating families at the border" claim is full of holes. Name a state that allows children to stay with their parents during their arrest and processing through the jail system? The border is not a welcome center, that should be obvious.

So, if I'm supposed to believe that Trump is torturing children by making them sleep in cages, can I swap it for the one about how many of these children are used repeatedly to pose as family members for border/asylum claims? I mean, there's bound to be a point system for all these claims.

 

Which ones are lies?

 

which ones are true ?

 

Name a state that confines them behind chain-link fences. They're typically placed with relatives, DHS or foster care.

 

Furthermore, often the children with these adults are not carrying identification. If you can’t prove the child is yours, and they are not being trafficked, why should they remain with the supposed parent and potential abuser?

 

"By force"? They walked over in pretty small numbers. Crowds 30 times that size are controlled every Sunday in the fall in America. If the NFL can handle it I'm sure a country can. There could have been some basic housing within a few hours if people wanted it. Basic being large tents, use of sporing stadiums. Things used for hurricanes or music festivals. Not "nice" long term but basic human needs are met. No cages, clean water, some place to poop. You could live like that for years not in total comfort but with sanitation and dignity. It's not that expensive or hard vs the morals if we don't.

During that time it's easy to photograph and fingerprint people. You know in case they are criminals? Also it's something the average person wanting to live here would be fine with. They want to escape the criminals too. That's not good enough for Trumpers. There is not enough punishment.

What they did would not be considered aggressive or force in other countries. Like I said they would just return them the the last country. You just can't be in ours so customs is that way. The idea that a bunch of lazy people would just walk to America for free stuff is sad and people think that. They put all this effort into stealing from you. Like they think "hey we never have to work if we just make Americans feel bad".

Since I was a kid right people hated Mexicans and "joked" about shooting them and walls on the border. It's not a new idea. ANY immigration is bad from those people.
You should believe they are denied basic medial care and sanitary conditions. And that they face strong mental and in some cases phycal abuse from the adult Americans who throw them enough food to survive.

Arresting them in the first place is unnecessary and is not done elsewhere. But to answer your question the kid would be in foster care with better treatment than the camps. And in foster care it'd be much easier for the kids and parents to be reunited. But again that's the not the idea with Trumpers.