aliens & their message

I think the bible is true, and yet is written in both parable and a sort of code...and its up to us to at at least use common sense when studying it...although common sense is not encouraged in many bible studies.

As you referred on down (but I didn't quote it) about Enoch looking toward celestial beings (or something like that)...I've also read the Aprocrypha but you have an excellent memory and really remember lots of good stuff!

I think the Annuki were the "sons of God"...the giants "the angels that fell to earth"...and most probably aliens. \

I don't have a problem accepting that "a higher power" could be alien...an alien,.

 

I just can't leave it the way I wrote it...Annuaki are the ones considered the sons of God...and the Nephilim are the children of the mixture when they mated with the daughters of men

....at least that's the way I understand it.

 

I have all 3 books of Enoch and the Apocrypha but have not read from start to finish, yet but I will.

My initial understanding of the terminologies is that the The Watchers are Anunnaki and the Nephilim are actually IGIGI. Now the IGIGI are interesting, pending the interpretations, the IGIGI most definitely were the troops stationed on Mars and were led by Marduk, but there's also been mention that the IGIGI were also artificially created by the Nubirians (we should only call the Anunnaki as those who were on earth as the species are not Anunnaki, that is the name they chose for themselves when they landed here "those from the heavens came") but the IGIGI had much more Nubirian DNA than humans the difference was almost not recognisable.

Now when Nibiru passed between Mars and Earth it came close and literally pulls Mars atmosphere away from it. The IGIGI and Marduk stayed on Mars for a long time still until it became inhabitable, then they came to earth. The IGIGI found earth to be a paradise and they took a strong liking to human women.

This is where I think the bible says the abomination of angels and man being together, God wipes the slate clean. The Sumerian tale is also very similar, the IGIGI meddled in the affaire or humans and chief commander of the Anunnaki Enlil (God) let's the slate be wiped clean and watched the flood wipe the world out.

About the giants: I haven't actually gotten into any of that, yet. But it's interesting to note that many south African tribal religions talk about the giants as being physical beings but from a very very long time ago, possibly even before the Anunnaki landed here 490,000 years ago. Not much was actually known until Michael Tellinger opened his museum in South Africa of the stone circles and had Africans come in to tell him he'd found the giants as he has many fossilised giant body parts in his museum.

 

Yes! The mixture of the Nephilim coincides with the artificial DNA mixed used in the IGIGI! and it was the IGIGI who mated with man. So we are totally on the same page there.

Now that's a Christian expert and my half arsed Sumerian expertise working together to unlock a singular, universal truth hehe.

 

Since the story of Adam and Eve makes little sense and the theory of evolution to man has more holes than a colander, I often wonder whether human life is alien to this planet in the first place.
It would explain different physical appearances, languages, and several other factors. The rate at which we consume natural resources and grind everything to sand, will turn the entire planet into a desert within 10,000 years an the sun cannot burn forever.
Perhaps we will then move on by spawning life somewhere else in the universe. It may well have happened before and this earth is simply a transient in the overall picture.

My two questions to people who doubt my hypothesis are........If we evolved from monkeys, why did some monkeys decide not to evolve and stay as monkeys........Why can mankind not comprehend infinity, Don't tell me you can, it will prove that you are shallow minded. But also don't ponder too hard, or you will end up driving yourself crazy.

 

I enjoyed that. I want to re-post my story about a theory just like that wilsjane.

 

Google search the Sumerian version of Adam, Eve and the Eden. there should be short dot point versions. This creation theory might just be more plausible if you are willing to open your mind to different possibilities.

Many disregard the biblical accounts, but the Sumerian version is scientifically plausible, easily, because we can do it ourselves.

But yes, read the Sumerian version where Adam/Adamu actually comes from, as well as the Eden. The biblical version was written thousands of years later and is much more user friendly and romanticised.

You'll find that the "serpent" is just the representation of Enki, the serpent was just his glyph and portrayal as a being. Enki was the scientist that created man.

Of course the biblical record is much different, but I honestly don't see the point in researching it when it's origins are much much older. Go to the direct original source I say.

 

Kind of looks like an Irminsul.

 

In a huge twist you will learn that while the Serpent is regarded as the Devil, it was actually God (Enlil) who was the Devil and not Enki, Enki only ever wanted humans to flourish. Enlil was not supportive of the creation of humans, he argued that it was not in "Gods plan" to create new life.

Though the Eden existed too and it was like the biblical accounts, it was a haven and paradise of beauty. The Apple in the bible is a representation of knowledge. Enlil became pissed off with Enki for teaching the newly created humans too much information. This is where Adam and Eve are expelled, not because they ate an apple, but because they were learning too much. Humans were only meant to be slaves mining gold, we weren't to be knowledgeable or obtain the knowledge that could overthrow the Gods as we climbed in population and numbers.

 

and here I go chiming in here with if you will read Genesis very carefully, you will find 2 different creation stories. Adam and Eve is just ONE of the creations stories, and it was Adam that was created specifically to till and keep that special Garden of Eden.

Then you keep reading and they are talking about on the 6th day there were people (man/ human) was created. Now <----- that part of the days of creations does not have a dang thing to do with making a man from clay.

 

Wasn't there something about Lillith ?

 

There’s one clear message: RACISM


Regardless of whether Aliens exist or not, it’s clear the intent of ancient alien theorists (mostly white men) is to undermine the accomplishments and the intellect of non-European cultures in Africa, South America, and North America,
by erasing their achievements and chalking it up to Aliens.


Aliens must have built the Great Zimbabwe because Africans don’t have the intellect or the imagination to build such a structure, The Egyptians and the Nubians must have had help in building dozens of pyramids throughout North Africa,
The Polynesians couldn't have built the statues on Easter island by themselves and must have had help (most likely from the Nordic Aliens) The pyramids throughout South and Mesoamerica were built by one of the lost tribes of Israel,
Native Americans exterminated earlier waves of white settlers who arrived first in North America , the Midwestern mound builders were Europeans who were wiped-out by Asians who crossed the land bridge 12,000 years ago,
Atlantis was a lost Aryan super-civilization that thrived for centuries before the great catastrophe …etc….

 

^^

LOL.

I'm pretty sure racism is not a clear front runner when ancient alien enthusients talk about the architectual accomplishments of the gods.

 

Interesting to note, it's a few pages back here I wrote about it, there are also two creation points in the Sumerian creation story as well. The first creation was that of Adamu, but it didn't work out, there was too much primal instinct from this creation, it kept reverting back to its animal instincts. So then they recreated man again using more of their own DNA until we were perfected as what we are today, beings that are able to read, learn, understand and most importantly, follow instructions under the fears of punishment.

 

I don't have an answer to the latter question but in regards to your former question, I'm pretty sure most all Monkeys today have since evolved from the common ancestor that we shared with them. In a way, evolution is about finding a niche, so if an ancestral monkey was mostly successful in it's niche, it's probably likely the mutations that lead to speciation for them weren't that significant.

Since there are already plenty of ridiculous ideas in this thread I'll throw this out there to oversimplify the idea of evolution. Let's say there was a large band of monkeys and then a significant forest fire happens or an earthquake, part of the monkey pack gets displaced. In the new environment, let's say the displaced monkeys experience less shade, different food sources, different weather etc, meanwhile the other group of monkeys stay the course. Stretch those different environmental variables out over the span of thousands to hundreds of thousands of years and then one group might mutate and develop new adaptations to the new environment which leads to a new species while the other is still successful in it's niche, without needing to change much.

 

Nice speculation, holds no ground though.
Not even the ancients were stupid enough to believe that. Modern man though.. Well they kinda look like us, we have to be monkeys then, yet there's zero accountability for such a theory, it's new age mythology created to help us understand where we come from.

 

My example was just illustrating a point. Evolution, niche, adaptabliity, it all holds ground.

 

When you find the missing link, feel free to post it again.

 

Did you not learn a damn thing from earlier in this thread?

 

Sorry, but I don't believe in New age mythology.