I agree, but the real reason matters. And the real reason seems to be that they're illegal immigrants, not their religious affiliation.
You see it that way, and I see inter-twined motivation. I think the cruelty is the clue. I doubt racism in Australia is as horrible as in America. I've visited many countries. All are somewhat racist, more or less depending on location. Canada is less racist than America. The Bahai in Iran promote inter-racial marriage between Black and White, but they demand adherence to Islam. Saudi Arabia is racist in many ways, usually based on religion and nationality, not Negro race. I mean they would accept a Sunna Negro who is a Saudi National but might reject one from Sudan. Brazil was racially tolerant until Bolsenaro took power. In northern Mexico you might get killed for being white but gladly accepted in Mexico City or San Luis Potosi. On a global level I see racism is often caused by the local people thinking an immigrant has arrived to take their job and women. Jingoism has been around for thousands of years.
Seems most examples you give are forms of discrimination indeed, but not always racial discrimination. What changed in Brasil regarding racial tolerance?
^ I heard a black immigrant, visitor or tourist is more likely to be discriminated in China than a white one. Did you noticed anything like that?
Right now in Tehran tens of thousands of Iranians have come to streets using their cars to cause traffic & block highways on security forces of Iran Islamic Regime who are on their ways to suppress anti-Islamic Regime ..
True even in Japan; however, in Japan, I don't think they hate a Negro. Maybe it's their way of elevating themselves? Japan is mostly a tolerant society. My friend who was in the US NAVY said some bars would not allow Americans to come inside, because of prior rude behavior by the Americans.
I'm glad you noticed that. I noticed in all Middle East nations were America supports their government, as in Egypt, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and Oman, there is no freedom at all. In these American supported dictatorships and monarchies, there is no democracy, no vote for the people, and journalists are butchered alive.
Are you insinuating a meaningful connection between the oppressive regimes and the american support for those regimes? Is the iranian citizen for example more free than the average person in Kuwait or Egypt?
Now that's a totally different question, Asmo. What I was illustrating is clear: One is Democratic and the other is not. In one case the people get to vote, in the other not. Which one is more free? I can't truly say. Iran is Democratic; but, is it more free? I can't say. In Saudi Arabia they do enjoy some liberties, if a part of the Sunna ruling class; but, if they are Shia minority, they get their head cut off in a public execution. Then there is Jamal Kashoggi. He got butchered alive by the Saudi Government … because he wrote something down on paper.
I want to add that Kuwait is an absolute monarchy. And they have ethnically cleans all Shia out already. Egypt is an absolute military dictatorship, which has overturned a democratic election. Neither could claim they are more free than Iran. The United States has more laws on the books than Iran, or Kuwait, or Morocco. More laws mean more restrictions on its population. What does that say?
I was asking what the relevance is of you noticing that middle eastern nations supported by the US are not free. Or was that just a random comment about a coincidence?
I somehow caught this documentary yesterday, chasing ISIS or discovering ISIS or something. Hooked me in for 2hrs. Where was I going with that... Oh yeah. These countries are fucked up hey. Like the kids literally indoctrinated straight away to hate over religion they really do not stand a chance in this world at all their whole life is fanatical hatred from the get go. It was actually really sad, but that's just life over there, I don't even find it life. These kids they just don't know what life is.
Well, your post was about protestors in Iran? I was assuming they are doing so because of discontent. The Middle east has much turmoil and lack of freedom. The region's people are discontented with their own governments, and also pissed off about other nations invading their country. In places like Egypt, they are opposed to the SISI military dictatorship; and, they know it is supported by America. That's a hundred million people oppressed by America through its puppet government. Remember the Egyptians voted for their own in 2010. They elected Mohammad Mursi. In Saudi Arabia they've never had free elections. In Kuwait, they have a royal family that is the first cousins of the Saudi Royal family, and also no democracy. It's a scenario which is repeated where oil is found. Seven of Iraq's leaders have been killed in the last hundred years, because of oil. Sudan was broken up because of oil. Gaddafi was killed because he wanted none American currency as payment for Libya's oil. Saddam Hussein refused to accept US Dollars for Iraq's oil. Today the Trump administration told Iraq that their Iraqi account at the Federal Reserve would be shut off to them if they insist on US Troops to leave Iraq. Ask your self: Who's money is that? Who's oil is it? And to whom does Iraq belong? Why does Iraq have to accept American management of its oil and oil revenue?
Stripped of context, it says absolutely nothing- right up your alley, I'm sure. Let's see, laws about divorce, and women's rights in the matter, are probably pretty thin in Kuwait, I would imagine. Or laws pertaining to discrimination (about which we have far too many, I would say). Ditto laws regulating interstate commerce. Gad, you certainly know how to spin the irrelevancies.
You seem to have little knowledge and understanding of the Middle East. Let's see : Iraq has more modern laws concerning women's rights. And they've had them for years. Iraq has equal pay for equal work for women, and America does not. A woman in Iraq can get divorced in a few hours. All she has to do is go to the court house and say her husband has bad breath. Women in the Middle East are not prohibited from divorce, unless maybe in a place like Saudi Arabia where America has full control. Now as far as interstate commerce goes, most Middle East nations use British Business Law, because of Marine Shipping and International Banking needs. Most Middle East countries use French Laws for criminal cases. French is the second language in places like Lebanon, Syria, Tunis, Algeria, and Morocco. All Middle East nations use English. I have been reading lately that many of them are warming up to China, because they can buy anything from that country. Most Muslims don't want to buy anything from America.
Japanese people may be more tolerant of blacks, today, but years ago that wasn't the case. btw, I like Japan, and the Japanese people. If I could, I would move to Japan.