Well, as a typical leftist likes to accuse other people of these these - "you're a bigot". I'm a centralist by the way, not right or a left winger.
Mitch McConnell is sitting on 400 + bills from the House How many are just political bullshit designed to clog up the works and slow the government down? Also, McConnell has always dragged his feet. Always. It frustrates both sides at times. I think he was a poor choice for the position, but look how he has managed to dig in. Mitch McConnell is blocking a fair impeachment trial in the Senate Fair? Oh please, this has been a stupid show since it started. Instead of REAL evidence all they have is hearsay and circumstantial crap they could stick to anyone. There's nothing "fair" about this. I said the same about Clinton's impeachment. (Very NPR use of fair though!) The entire Republican party has transformed into the party of Trump lapdogs (but none more than my own Senator Lindsay Graham) Now this is funny. Republicans still hate Trump, he showed everybody what fools they have been. A you see from them is quality acting skills these days. Graham blows with the winds, same as Wallace, same as Kerry. Trump has just announced he wont allow John Bolton to testify at his own impeachment trial If it's his option, he'll take it. No shock there. Legal is legal. Republican Pacs and interest groups have received millions of dollars from Russian entities since 2016 So have the democrats. Oddly Ukraine contributed the same amount to both! Trump is practicing brinkmanship...etc etc...and half the country is acting as if this is all normal. Here I may agree with you, but only because brinkmanship is something very common on the planet right now. This recent shit with Iran is a prime example as is just about everything we hear from North Korea. We have to face the fact that smooth talk and promises of cash and prizes don't always reach people the way we expect. Some of them don't care about that and long for the fight. History is full of such people. Seems entertaining.
We can't comment on something after it happened?? I dont need to know the dude's name to form the opinion that assassinating the top general of a sovereign nation that has never attacked the US is probably a bad idea Also forming your own opinion is the opposite of sheep
Not at all on the scale of republicans. They used to take the same amount from Russia but Russians contribution to the Republicans drastically and mysteriously increased around 2016 and after. I dont have the energy to reply to everything else, no real surprise you would try to justify everything lol. your bias is showing the bias you claim not to have
Actually no, I am going to reply to this because this is a blatant falsehood. It isnt legal at all. It's very clear obstruction of justice. On what planet do you live on where a president should have any say in his own impeachment trial? And as for your thinking he's innocent and the Democrats are just going after him on bullshit charges...he wants to block someone's testimony. You're naive if you think he isnt trying to hide something You're a real trip dude
You're still drawing a conclusion that I am telling you is invalid. But you prefer to use lines of text to cement your opinion. Have you noticed yet that I'm not doing this to you? Seriously man, where do you get off with this?
You notice how the Nth Korea thing has all been diffused, all it took is a couple love letters Pelosi is stalling, because she knows the impeachment thing is going to backfire He has now made the Iranians look like bungling idiots tripping over themselves, all that took is one drone Honduran caravans, remember them, oh wait, what happened And this is the guy you numbsculls want to believe is dumber than you lot
They're not being used or oppressed? Are all of you from fucking China? I swear half the time people on the internet make no goddamned sense. It's become eerie. I can't possibly be so out of touch to the point where your nonsensical utterances actually mean something to everyone else but me.
I'm clearly not saying anyone can not say anyone can't or can comment on our opinion on that. For that is our pure and utter Freedom of Speech we every one of us should always appeal for. What I'm commenting on is that we have to be level headed, that none of us will ever have the balanced facts - ie we can only ever be sheep in this regard. We ONLY vote on domestic affairs, never international.
Only on 1 aspect and it is not assumed. I explicitly avoided assuming a motive so yeah, nice try. No, I'm noticing you keep reacting to my posts, kind of as you expect to get the last word because you debunked my claim. As long as you doing that in a way I feel that deserves a nuancing correction you will simply get that. If you are at odds with people argumenting their opinions with a lot of text you might be in the wrong place. It all depends on what is said, you trying to put it like you're doing something admirable by refraining from such a thing and me doing as something dubious is amusing. Keep it up If you didn't keep trying to refute what i said about you cutting slack on a side in such a way that multiple people (not just me) are correcting and nuancing you, I for one wouldn't go on. If you do it with solid argument or refutal i will humbly accept it
You are forgetting the option that we do not have to follow our leaders at all. If we have to do it blindly I would quit right away. You worded it at first instance either in a real bad and unfortunate way so that everybody else misunderstood, or you're trying to put it like you actually ment something different.