And here it is. A very interesting read. I enclose a few excerpts of things that stood out for me...but i hve o go back and reread it in depth....
Joe Biden happily confessed his crime at a Council On Foreign Relations meeting . Why wouldn't it then be investigated , and especially with the help of the Ukrainian govt that he victimized ? Haven't you heard the audio recording ?
Nah, I was never any good at asking people for money, especially people who throw their money at politicians when the entire voting system has been gerrymandered to death and our constitution shredded. Every major university study done for the last 30 years has indicated your vote no longer matters, and its pointless discussing the issue with complete idiots.
Because Joe Biden wanted Ukraine's chief prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, removed becasue he was corrupt and had failed to investigate charges of embezzlement and misconduct by public officials in 2014. Not becasue he was investigating the gas company, he wasn't. Biden committed no crime, worked to have corruption ended, and in fact made it easier for the company his son was involved in to be investigated. But you can continue to blame Joe for what Trump has done.
Doesn't matter who you blame, the same people that elected Obama elected Donald Duck and almost 40% of them insist everything is just fine, fine, fine. The very idea that Donald Duck might spend a minute in jail for fraud, theft, income tax evasion, or even for committing treason is absurd, and he can say whatever the fuck he wants, right along with Fox News.
Trump reportedly makes veiled threats to spies in his administration. Trump Attacks Whistle-Blower’s Sources and Alludes to Punishment for Spies By Maggie Haberman Sept. 26, 2019 Updated 2:32 p.m. ET Trump Attacks Whistle-Blower’s Sources and Alludes to Punishment for Spies excerpt: "President Trump told a crowd of staff from the United States Mission to the United Nations on Thursday morning that he wants to know who provided information to a whistle-blower about his phone call with the president of Ukraine, saying that whoever did so was “close to a spy” and that “in the old days,” spies were dealt with differently. The remark stunned people in the audience, according to a person briefed on what took place, who had notes of what the president said. Mr. Trump made the statement several minutes into his remarks before the group of about 50 mission employees and their families at the event intended to honor the mission. At the outset, he condemned the former Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr.’s role in Ukraine at a time when his son Hunter Biden was on the board of a Ukrainian energy company."
The president has no choice but to declare martial law, throw congress in jail, and take control of the mass media so he can get to the bottom of the issue.
Why not? You think having hundreds of idiots in congress selling us all down the river is better than just one in the white house? I'm in a rush to get the end of this sad reality TV show. At this point, anything is better than a country led by the fucking KKK and Neo-Nazis.
How Trump's paranoia and conspiracy theories become US policy Zach Wolf Analysis by Zachary B. Wolf, CNN Updated 1:39 AM ET, Mon August 12, 2019 Trump's conspiracy theory paranoia becomes US policy - CNNPolitics excerpts: "This is the man who built a political career by fanning the fringe of American politics with fevered insinuations or allegations, including, but not limited to the baseless theories that: Barack Obama wasn't born in the US A rival's father was in on the John F. Kennedy assassination The 2016 presidential election was rigged against him even though he won Millions voted illegally for Hillary Clinton The US government spied on his campaign There's a deep state of bureaucrats organized against him The special counsel appointed by his Justice Department was actually a witch hunt organized by Democrats" "He's the President turning paranoia into policy. Where many Americans see immigrants living among them, raising families, attending schools, Trump sees an army of invaders threatening the US. Where many lawmakers on both sides of the political aisle have great confidence in the US intelligence community, Trump sees an apparatus "run amok." Where many economists see an independent Federal Reserve as an important part of a free economy, Trump sees unaccountable policymakers trying to ruin his presidency, and he tries to pressure them to lower interest rates. Where many people see the US as a the world superpower with an interest in free trade and friendly relations, Trump sees a nation turned into a sucker, forced by leaders from both parties to give too much away to other countries -- the latest example is his frustration with China." "Under normal circumstances, most Americans might be predisposed to trust the Pentagon over North Korea. But not Trump." "Americans would similarly, under normal circumstances, trust the US intelligence community over Russia's Vladimir Putin. But not Trump, as has been demonstrated repeatedly."
I still want the damn tax returns to be turned over to Richard Neal. There was a secret bank owned by a secret government of another nation and they have refused to turn over files. If William Barr helped them evade American Law, then he should spend the rest of his life in prison.
Remark of South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham after reading the Trump-Ukraine transcript: "What a nothing (non-quid pro quo) burger." Remark of South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham during the Clinton impeachment in 1999: "A president doesn't even have to be convicted of a crime to be impeached. Impeachment is about restoring honor and integrity to the office."
So let me see if I got this straight. The whistleblower is lodging this complaint based on what other "are they named or not" numerous sources told him/her Trump was doing? No firsthand actual witnessing of any "alleged" activities? Yet none of these "other people" are being subpeoned to testify before this hearing? Am I missing anything? What could possibly go wrong with this scenario? I only listened to about an hour of actual testimony. And what I saw for myself was the Acting DOI never ever said he supported what the whistleblower said. He said he supported that said Whistleblower acted in accordance with the law and he would protect him from retribution for making the report. Unlike the headlines reported by CNN. He did not say the WBs accusations were right or wrong, not would he personally say if he felt the accusations were valid. Nor did he say (he wasn't asked) that said Whistleblower would not face retribution if report was found to be false. Either by ignorance or by purpose. We are after all dealing with an intelligence community that has been less than stellar in the performance of their duties. The Dems could eff up a 72-0 lead in a football game with 12 seconds left to play.
Assuming that the following in the report is factual, Trump shouldn't be accusing others of perpetrating missing servers and information. White House officials told me that they were "directed" by White House lawyers to remove the electronic transcript from the computer system in which such transcripts are typically stored for coordination, finalization, and distribution to Cabinet-level officials. Instead, the transcript was loaded into a separate electronic system that is otherwise used to store and handle classified information of an especially sensitive nature. One White House official described this act as an abuse of this electronic system because the call did not contain anything remotely sensitive from a national security perspective.