Gun ownership itself is a slight mental illness

Morning guys.
Just thought I'd take my mental illness and rifle out for a hunt this fine morning.

 

Well, lawyers wrote it, so I'm more inclined to see the wisdom in their words as opposed to some modernized perspective from the NRA. The constitution is not a bible, so interpretation is not whatever anyone wants it to be (unlike a bible).

But if this is too much for you to discuss, don't discuss it. I'm certainly not forcing you.

 

Hunting what? Mountain goats a mile away?

 

Piece of cake.

 

Overkill... you just need a bread knife for that.

 

Or a ladder....

 

There was nothing out and about this morning. So my mentally fucked up head dropped the magazine, took out the bullets, slid out the bolt, padlocked them away in my rifle bag, zipped the bag up and locked it then walked to my truck, secured my locked rifle bag under the seat, took it home and housed it in my safe.

 

That's mental

 

Didn't OP especially mention he didn't mean hunting rifles used for actual hunting?

 

Preaches to others not to respond to Irminsul... Responds to Irminsul.

 

Your home is so beautiful! I feel like I'd be a better version of myself if I lived somewhere that breathtakingly beautiful.

 

You think lawyers are more likely to be wise than the Bible? Actually, in American Government classes, the Founding Fathers are praised for their grand ambiguities--leaving it to future generations to adapt the Constitution to the needs of changing times. The Second Amendment opens with the words "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..." In U.S. v.Miller (1939), the Supreme Court took that opening language seriously, and ruled that the Second Amendment did not protect weapon types not having a "reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia." That was the way it stood until 2008, when the narrow 5-4 majority decided to brush those words aside and hold that the Amendment gave individuals the right to bear arms apart from the militia--but added the qualifiers that the right doesn't preclude reasonable regulation like forbidding "the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill" or restrictions on "the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons." Prior to that decision, those lawyers on the Supreme Court held that the Second Amendment was a collective right and did not give individuals the right to bear arms at all, and the four dissenting Justices continued to uphold that position. That's lawyers for you!

 

Appalachia?

....

I mean it's a pretty low blow act to try and get people to not communicate with other members. If people want to respond to my posts, let them. If not, then they won't. But to sit there and try and form a side against me etc. And he says he doesn't personally attack people. LOL. Rocks in his head at times.

 

Such a beautiful natural setting, spoiled by the intrusion of your rifle. Is that symptomatic?

 

lol blah blah blah.

i'm the king of the jungle there brah.

yeeeah that's a sick rhyme, I'll be using that in my next bust. See what all that serenity does for you?

 

I'm sure the Appalachians have pretty spots but I don't think they compare to those foothills where you are.

 

If it can be said in 1 sentence...

 

Redneck!