9/11

Did you already forget that these quotes:

"The core space contained relatively little combustible mass." (NCSTAR 1-5 p49 para7)

"The fuel loading in the core areas of the focus floors was negligible." (NCSTAR 1-5 p51 para2)

have to do with the core of the Tower? Now, what that that tell you about the alleged core column-weakening fires?

And about that, they said:

In addition, based on discussions with people who had been in the Towers, the team assumed that the fuel loading in the core areas of the focus floors was negligible.

Also, where's your support for your claim that 99% of the population "gets it"? You made that up, too, didn't you?

 

This is the section you are pulling those quotes from, it starts off by saying office combustibles alone are enough to sustain fires for at least an hour

 

Keep repeating that question for 20 pages to reaffirm to everyone i think the handful of truthers left are merely those 1% swimming in the shallowest end of the gene pool

 

Yeah, and it ends with saying:

"The core space contained relatively little combustible mass." (NCSTAR 1-5 p49 para7)

"The fuel loading in the core areas of the focus floors was negligible." (NCSTAR 1-5 p51 para2)

Now, what does this tell you about the alleged core column-weakening fires?

 

You claimed that 99% of the population "get it." I asked you to support that claim, and you've got nothing. That means that you made that up, too.

And now you're making up that I've repeated that question for 20 pages. The first time I asked was one page ago. Exaggerate much?

 

No, i am telling you to keep repeating that question for the next 20 pages

 

I won't repeat it if you can support your claim that 99% of the population "get it." So, can you support it, or is that another thing that you just made up?

 

It tells me there wasnt any paper, books or office furniture wedged in between the elevator shafts and centre columns of the buildings.

What do you think they mean by combustible mass and fuel loading there?

We can add this to the list now, Storch says there werent any office chairs in the centre of the building and that means building couldnt have fallen down

 

What caused the alleged core column-weakening fire in the core area?

 

You will have to keep asking for 20 pages to find out

But actually think i can, site traffic to your beloved 911researchwtc.net aint what it used to be

 

So you'd rather not divulge the source from which you learned that 99% of the population "get it." I think we all know what that means. Don't you?

 

case you missed it.
Man who abused 9/11 widow identified and fired from job

 

Oi vey, what an ahole

 

Tisk tisk tisk tisk

We have been through this so many times

Core columns arent going to stand up by themselves anyway once the outside of the building and floors are gone.

Maybe try find another way to try bash Republican governments particularly, than try to deny al-qaeda was responsible for 9/11

 

I'm afraid that I'm going to have to ask you to cite something to back up this claim, too.

Did you find anything to support your "99% of the population 'get it'" claim?

But getting back to the idea that the fire caused the collapse, that seems to go against the NIST's own findings.

For instance:

“From the limited number of recovered structural steel elements, no conclusive evidence was found to indicate that pre-collapse fires were severe enough to have a significant effect on the microstructure that would have resulted in weakening of the steel structure.”

And to that point:

In 2007, a group of scientists, an architect, and two 9/11 family members filed a “Request for Correction” to the NIST report under the Information Quality Act.9 They requested that, among other things, NIST’s report “be revised to make its computer simulation conditions actually simulate physical reality.” The Request noted:

“NIST has provided no justification whatsoever for allowing its computer simulations to heat the steel to temperatures well above 600°C when its own physical tests reveal that little, if any, of the steel inside the WTC ever reached 600°C.”

 

. . .