Prepare to loose warp drive on the net.....unless you pay for it that is. So much for the little guy.
I can't find a source for anti Clinton Russia ads, provide a link please. But, if true that just highlights the need to take action. Whether they promote one side or the other is immaterial. There was nothing illegal about the Democrats favoring Clinton, it's their party, they can favor anyone they want. Why is this so hard to understand? Sanders wasn't a Democrat until he joined the presidential race, he remains an Independent in the Senate.
Here is a quick one. There are about 500 other sources that summarize it similarly. Russian ads, now publicly released, show sophistication of influence campaign Now to the Dems election antics. Hillary stole votes from Bernie Sanders. They even told him so when they learned it. Here are again a few links of many that state pretty much the same thing. These are not Republican smear campaigns this is the Democrats suing their own party. It shows in pretty good detail how the party is being run. Read it all! Inside Hillary Clinton’s Secret Takeover of the DNC DNC Lawsuit Exposes Corruption, Data Breaches, Raises Questions About Death Of Shawn Lucas Articles: The Coming Election Fraud This gives some credibility to the term "Rigged Votes" that the man you hate so much has tried to tell us are part of the process. He may also be rigging votes and as far as I am concerned likely is. You decide who has your interest at heart.
I can't get the Post, they want a dollar, but I did find these. The vast majority seem to favor Trump though. Regardless that's why it's so important to stop them, they'll support whoever they think will give them an advantage..
I read them all, top to bottom. From your first link: The lawsuit mentioned in the second link was dismissed Aug., 25. The third is just an old rant. No rigged votes, nothing illegal, just politics. Look, I voted for Bernie, he lost. Then I voted for Hillary as the next best, she lost. Either would have been light years better than the Trump.
Trump has appointed Jim Birdenstine to lead NASA. The man is not a scientist and is a climate change denier. Go figure...
Roy Moore's loss in Alabama clearly struck a nerve of frustration in some people and set off a new rash of off-topic posts.
It could have been worse. Trump could have nominated someone to head NASA who had previously sued NASA and called for its termination. Trump made Rick Perry the secretary of Energy, a department Perry had previously said he would abolish. Trump made Oklahoma attorney general Scott Pruitt the head of the EPA who had previously launched 14 lawsuits against the EPA and publicly stated that he wanted to dismantle it.
Trump has a fondness for politicians from Oklahoma. Like Pruitt, Trump's nominee to head NASA, Jim Bridenstine, is from Oklahoma. Trump's campaign centerpiece was a rebellion against the politicians in DC and the political system in general, yet he selects politicians from Oklahoma lacking in qualifications to head major agencies in DC. Bridestine is a U.S. House member with no academic or work experience in science and engineering. If Trump wanted to be consistent with his campaign thesis, he would have picked someone with a background and caliber of innovators such as Elon Musk of Space X and Tesla. Such people are not the run of the mill politicians of the establishment, and they have the proper qualifications to lead an agency such as NASA. Elon Musk walked out of Trump's manufacturing council which later disbanded after numerous other members resigned in the wake of some crass decisions by Trump. The council could have served as a venue for cultivating cutting edge engineering and manufacturing, as opposed to propping up the old school petroleum industries and political cronies in Oklahoma.
He does not care one bit about planet earth or about leaving it in better condition than he found it in....He only cares about lining his pockets with more gold....That is why he picked people like the devil himself, Pruitt.
That is the way of Republicans in general. The environment is fine and always will be. Any attempt to preserve it is a conspiracy to obstruct business from our political rivals. He claims Global Warming is made up by the Chinese. So is that why China (and all of the world) now has all those restrictions on their carbon emissions? The same ones you turned down. I guess they want to sabotage their own country too. Sadly the planet has become a partisan issue and Republican voters will still find a way to blame the other guy when the weather gets even worse. Each year is the hottest on record. It does not snow for months at a time in America in areas that were once known as ski towns. Coastal towns flood in Italy flood all the time now. All the evidence is there.
I'd just bet this Birdenstine thinks God created the Universe in six days, and did so about 5600 years ago! These idiots from Oklahoma do not believe in evolution...unless they want to insist Negros evolved from monkeys.
Apparently there are a few here that think they can get away with BS like Fox "news" does every day without being checked. No days, clowns.
I've Yes. Mass human migrations will become much more widespread as more and more communities are affected by climate change
I think the Greenland ice pack is more reliable. It's been above normal the past two years. It's hard to manipulate ice. Also, here in Seattle last year we experienced the coldest winter in 40 years.
I think we should leave Baldnbare alone - as i point out elsewhere he is basically one of those poor afflicted people you find mumbling or shouting idiocy on street corners or on the tube (subway) someone to be ignore but also pitied.