London Tube Terrorist Attack

Are refugees just thrown into the same foster system as naturalized kids though?

I think, at least in the US, being a host for refugees is an entirely different thing from the foster care system. I cant speak for the UK

 

Lets now split that into three main topics of conversation:



1. Pretty shitty for foster carers that do the right thing. This couple in Surrey have apparently been doing it for decades, a job most people are too selfiish to do, and at the end this is how they get rewarded by everyone else, labelled as people who were harbouring terrorists and another set of people who will jump to, oh, they were foster parents, 50/50 chance, a totally made up statostic BTW, they were molesting their foster kids.
And what happens to those kids if they dont go into foster care, a whole bunch of people ready to judge foster carers, who at the same time dont actually give a shit about those kids otherwise



2. Lets now somehow try and validate his actions, potentially killing 100 people on a train if the bomb had worked by saying, oh, but he was molested as a kid? Something thats usually propagated by people a little too titilated by talking thinking of kids getting fiddled with. Something to do with sex wins over violence yet again

Even though, if the made up 50/50 figure is correct, then there are a whole bunch of people out there that were molested as kids, that dont go on to blow people up on trains, go on shooting rampages or even go on to molest kids as adults. In that, its a nature more than nuture thing, but then we'd have to come to the confronting conclusion, that being molested as a kid has nothing to do with it, more that they were born sociopaths, shitty personality types with no empathy.

That violence does win over sex when it comes to creating a sociopath, that growing up in a war zone pre foster care combined with having a shitty non empathetic personality to start with has far more to do with it, and that if you let immigrants in from active war zones you are pretty much guaranteed to get that slightly higher percentage that grow up to be mass murderers than if you let immigrants in from poor countries not in the middle of a civil war



3. Why do we even need foster carers in the first place? We are so ready to take in impovershished immigrants, and yet the world over, there are never enough resources for each country to look after their own kids. Why dont we have orphanages with the same quality of resources as some of these paid childcare places.

Because most people dont give a shit about kids unless they get a direct reward from it

This BTW, is a complete load of crap, and you probably know it, but never really want to think about it, its more likely to come from the childs uncle or aunt, grandparents, then older siblings/cousins.......but pretty much everyone ends up becoming an uncle or aunt at some stage...so,,,,

 

I think there are plenty of foster who are in it for social service reasons. There's also some who are in it for cash or to abuse kids

I already said it wasn't justified, so you're barking up the wrong tree. I simply pointed out that their experience in foster care may have been part of why he (they) did it

Yes, just like most of your other posts

 

There seems to be a trend of if someone does something against the law, people look for a way to blame the western world or Christian people for their actions. Foster homes. Most likely these terrorists were fucked prior to being taken in as well as being indoctrinated into a cult self righteous community prior. Molestation in the house is polentially speculation? Is there proof of this?

No good deed goes unpunished!

Solution, fuck them, not literally! Don't be a bleeding heart!