Why do Jewish liberals/democrats shill for barry hussain and other islamo/socialists? One would assume Jews would resent the universal muslim threat MORE than other religions. Perhaps we could arrange a "deal" with Isreal to "police" the islamic barbarians of the region?
It is very obvious that there are mutual interests. But 'Barry' is not an islamist or muslim and I don't see even if they would regard him as a socialist why they would have a problem with him or his country because of that. Perhaps you can explain why you seem to think otherwise?
I assume you are talking about Mr Obama . I know he did change his name on that fake birth cert. from the US state of HI . Is he truly a Moslem ? Maby .
Ahem , Personally , the "pissing contest" was won when mohamid began the religion in order to marry a 9 yr old. Truth be told but still off topic. Why do Jewish liberals defend islamo/socialists bent on terminating the entire jewish faith? We can not tell from the various "birth certs" any religious preference. However , I have never met a Christian named "hussain".
Was that an answer on my question? So because he's called Hussain they should ignore the need for a powerful ally and their mutual interests? What does Mohammed marriage say exactly about the pissing contest of who's the greater god? I don't see the link.
I didn't think you would . There seems to be some kind of diabolical evil associated with a grown man horny for a 9 yr old. At least in my world. I believe barry refers to himself as a Roman Catholic. I find it curious that anyone professing to be a Catholic is also named hussain. Just an observation. Getting back to topic. islam has already promised to make this ramadan a "bomb-a-thon" ; Do you think Isreal will finally get assertive and address their problem?
I think Isreal should not get more assertive as they are already. But I just want to add about the marriage thing that in your and mine 'world' so to speak historically that it was not uncommon neither to sometimes marriage a ten year old. Now I do not want to imply that that is a healthy and ok situation but I do want to say that we are judging from our current societal outlook that has never been more fair overall. It is easy to judge other current societies that have not gone to the same progressive developments as our 'world' did and also easy to ignore where we came from. In example look in detail how we perceived women in our own society only a few generations ago. We had much more in common with islamic culture back then but people like you seem to ignore that all and divide us in we good they evil...
I'm also still wondering why Israel would bother about the fact Obama might be more of a socialist, which I asked earlier. Why did you skip that part in your answer?
The afore mentioned post is a beautiful example of the "islamo-apology" philosophy. Unbelievable rationalizing pedophlia just to be PC. Sick. However, I conclude my point has been made. Check please. I don't really think isreal is concerned with barry's give away programs in the US ; I do think they are waiting for more handouts from the US taxpayer. barry , however , chooses to prop up muslim leaders like morsi instead.
Well, that's how you want to interpretate it. I don't advocate or support pedophilia in any way, I don't even see why I should explain this. You have your own agenda of spreading hate and disregard your own cultures past to demonize another. Yes, it is wrong they use their prophet's teaching to excuse many atrocities against women but it is more useful to speak out against those actions than to ramble and smite a prophet that lived in an age when our own ancestors had the same practices. It has really nothing to do with being PC or not but more with nuancating and being less hypocritical.
So why did you include that socialist part in your original post? I guess the islamist/muslim accusation wasn't a strong enough point on it's own?
It's going to be interesting to read your "explaining away" clit removal as well. Maybe you could try to sell us on the positive islamic contributions to society regarding homicide bombing and grade school invasion while your at it. Go ahead. Please.
My above question still stands (I can see why you ignored it)... but now you're projecting stuff on me. I already told you I'm not selling or approving the atrocities made by certain muslims. I guess it should be obvious enough to me that no one else is answering you in this thread.
Ive addressed your question regarding socialism. Seems your sporting a feeble defense of islamic terror and or global socialism.
mmmm. While not all participants are actively involved in terror , no leader or cleric has spoken out against the hate crimes.
I guess the Jewish dem. liberals that voted for mr. Obama are just not that bright . Its kind of like loaning your crazzy neghbor a .45 when you know he might just shoot you.
This has been tried to explain many times. They do not have a leader or central organization like other religions have in some form or another. I'm sure some muslims and perhaps even some imams have spoken out against such actions and groups like the Taliban for example but since they do not speak for muslims outside their own community in general such statement do also not appear on a wide scale usually. I agree it would be wise for muslims to speak out and condemn their faulty brothers practices in public. But I know that the lack of those public messages does not mean they are supporting it.
