twin tower bombs

How about CGI?



10 minutes work on your home computer


so you all wanna see some bombs?

feast your eyes on this lil jewel



and this one, the side they didnt show you on tv LOL



how about that?

 

:beatdeadhorse5:

Happy New Year...

 

This one is a obvious one..hard to believe people actually believe the "official" story..makes me very shameful to even be American..there will be a day when these Satanic politicians will get theirs..dust they will become

 

Originally Posted by Pressed_Rat View Post
Anyone who doesn't think the towers were brought down in a controlled demolition need only look at the perfect collapse of WTC-7 on the evening of 9/11. I personally don't think the towers were brought down the same way, but if one building was intentionally demolished that day, what makes it so hard to believe the others were not as well? Never before 9/11 have buildings collapsed from what we were told the main cause of the collapses on 9/11 to be: fire.

no, not this.

believe what you want (or what Alex Jones wants you to, whatev). there have been building collapses due to fire.
here's a complete report on a collapse a few years before, note page 26 where other similiar fires leading to collapse occured.

http://www.interfire.org/res_file/pdf/Tr-097.pdf

failure of an engineered system designed to withstand a set of theoretical circumstances happens all the time. that doesn't mean it's a conspiracy.
unless you want it to.

 

:beatdeadhorse5:

Happy New Year

 

dont you have your underwater basket weaving course soon?

 

Nope. Would it be fairer to say: come up with something original, or at least provide a little more than what you did. Otherwise it comes across as spam, IMHO.

 

I would like to say to you thanks for the great insight on how I should think..you are truly an original genius..I bet you watch FOX? fair and balanced!

 

and you really should not say IMHO, cause honesty plays no part in your opinion

 

It's...In My Humble Opinion

 

yeh but this is not a real plane, no one needs to be a cgi expert to see it do they?



I can certainly understand why some people would prefer to sleep and pray this gets swept under the carpet!




on the other hand that is a real plane, you can test the graphics if you like.

 

Keep in mind that the buildings you are talking about have completely different design goals.

Auditoriums and show rooms in your examples are designed for maximum unobstructed open area and generally those structures are not so prone to catch fire and have low probability of fire.

Office hirises on the other hand are very prone to fire with smokers throwing cigarettes into garbage cans etc. and they require much higher redundancy.

Your fire report shows thin walls that caved and one overhead that is disformed, which is not out of line for those types of designs however its not applicable comparatively to the hirises because hirises are designed far more robust. In the case of the wtc, 5 times redundancy.

case in point, the steel hirise did not fail after suffering I believe nearly 16 hours huge billowing fire, the wtc buildings had no billowing fires in any of them!




meantime the water sprinklers in the wtc were working




the fires were going out and an entire side of the building didnt even have smoke damage much less fire damage

 

We don't get Fox News in the UK.

 

Your videos look like they have been under a carpet for a decade...we have already been through the use of crappy images.

 

.

 

Yes I know you want better quality CGI, frankly I am happy their fraud is so obvious.

oddly enough 12 years later you still accept this is a real plane?



and this one aired 50 times per day for 5 years by every network

 

Is it time to trot out your photo bucket account again...?

I accept the first video is the sun bounced off the wing.

I can not say I payed much notice of the others.

Only the slightly unhinged think a couple of planes did not hit a couple of buildings.

Like I said: :beatdeadhorse5:

 

unhinged? I have a different position in that only the slightly unhinged would believe the "original" footage are real planes.

10 minutes of cgi gets the same results.



10 minutes work on your home computer

hollywood did a much better job of making it look real than the government and news media.



well maybe not hugely more real but definitely a more convincing job overall.

and as far as clarity goes how could you wish for better clarity that this?




You do not even need to strain your eyes to see that its classic explosively controlled demolition

 

That'll be a 'yes' on the trotting out your photo bucket account, then. *sigh*

 

plane blob wing disappeared due to reflecting sunlight off buildings.. a phenomenon called counter illumination ..