The 4 Fascism's of America- essay I'm writing

This will be an essay where I explore what I believe are the 4 American Fascisms:

Christian Dominionism- Belief that God has made America his dominion. Believers must take over the state and create a Christian United States. Will serve as the intellectual political and organizational leadership of the movement (Men of God, Republican Party, churches). They will also be the propaganda face of the movement (Christian radio, books, pulpits). They will also organize the worst off, via "Christian Charity", infused with fascist propaganda.

Tea Party- They are racist, but not consciously, they also can be won over to more conscious racism. They will serve as the "meat" of the movement, putting most bodies at rallies. They will also be "useful idiots", taking people angry at the economic crisis and marching them to the hot dog grinder.

anti immigrant movement- They are much more overtly racist, many racist and fascist groups use them as a gate way to mainstream politics (minutemen, National Socialist Movement, Klan). They will serve as the "stormtroopers", the violent fist of the movement. They will also be the force that organizes among the coercive sections of the state, by helping them put down "scum".

Militia Movements: These are conspiracy theorists and racist lunatics. They will be the underground of the movement, the part that will commit crimes, provide places to lay low, and create havens for the fully initiated to organize (Nazi compounds, militia camps.)

These are all the links I have so far:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dPAG4ECUVQYF8v2VtbCD59dGIM34e2qsSvMe7mZbbI4/edit

Can you help me find more, give me some theoretical advise and any critiques you might have.

Please put links in the document comments. I don't want this cluttered.

 

I'm just questioning how your report is going to be organized and how long it's going to be. It seems like you might be able to do a better report by focusing on one of the four.

 

They are all interrelated, and will work together. I might write one general essay and then four smaller ones on each movement individually and then right a longer essay on how to combat them.

 

I figured it was just a school project, and was worried about you running out of space.

I notice the connection -- it just wasn't very well organized here and I have no way of knowing if you're planning on explaining how they are independent groups that are mostly incidentally working together.

If the connection doesn't fly to someone - the whole thing's gonna be suspect.

I'm reading a book right now that's full of awesome information, but the book's a pain to read because the writers aren't connecting any of their thoughts to the thesis. There are whole chapters that I've really enjoyed - but just couldn't understand what it had to do with the book.

 

I am sure that will go over well with your typical libtard professor, but to me you sound brainwashed because you didn't even address the most glaring form of fascism, which is corporate/government fascism. You sound like the type of person who probably worships government and mindlessly grovels to authority. Sorry if that sounds harsh, but that is how I feel after reading that crap you wrote. Those types of people you mentioned are not my kind of people, but they're mostly harmless. The typical Obama drone (drone, as in one of his mindless followers) is far more dangerous than any Christian militia member, as whacko as they may be. Hell, at least these people challenge the government instead of just bending over and taking it up the ass.

You should try getting a job with the ADL or SPLC. What you wrote reads like the kind of shit they put out. Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if you visited their websites before writing this tosh.

 

After clicking on the link you posted, I realize I am right. You did in fact visit the SPLC website for your weak propaganda.

 

I am an anarcho communist. Obama is a war criminal.

 

Anarcho communist? Don't worry, you'll grow out of it.

 

grow out of believing producers should get all they produce, and murder is wrong even if the killer has a badge? I hope not! But I do fear growing into a slack jawed, obedient "productive member of society"

 

I agree that the corporate oligarchy is a much bigger totalitarian, for it is the biggest contributor to our government; but it's not fascist. They don't give a shit about the country, let alone nationalism. They want us as dumb as they can get us.

Also, I don't understand why a conspiracy theorist would be so mean towards someone who is trying to challenge the current worldviews. Unless that is, if they cared about their own psyche more than their message.

 

lol

That is one of the dumbest things I've read. Anarchy and communism are in complete contradiction with one another, since anarchy entails no government, while communism requires centralized authoritarian rule. There is no such thing as anarcho-communism. That is an oxymoron, and you, well, you are just a mor...

 

http://libcom.org/thought/anarchist-communism-an-introduction

http://libcom.org/thought/ideas/anarcho-syndicalism

http://www.infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionF1

 

Essay Stated:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16CQcjHkNG7nLv-oZFOt_XKi1qpinbHKKyAaWoYvcIeU/edit

 

People still call themselves anarcho-communists? Shit I thought Monty Python had taken sufficient piss out of anarcho-anythings to keep anyone with more than 3 neurons away from that....

Labelling yourself is limiting. I don't give a shit what label you apply, whether it is ethnic, religious, political, financial or even sporting. As soon as you say "I am an ______ist", you're pigeonholed, and you have limited your capacity to understand and implement.

Be yourself.


(unless of course you do it to get laid. That's perfectly acceptable. PS if you do, the leftist chicks are easier but the Rep girls take it up the ass).

 

How do you know I'm a guy? (I am but still)

 

I'm prescient. Ask thedope.

 

Especially when debating or trying to spread your views. As soon as people label you, or you label yourself - it creates a divide between you and your audience.

 

I don't believe in debate. Socialism is bread in the school of struggle. I may have converted via reading, but most of my friends became socialists on the picket line. When you realize that your labor is the only thing making your boss money, and that by taking your labor you starve him, you truly understand socialism.

 

You don't believe in debate? And yet here you are....

 

In the sense of trying to spread my ideology I do believe in discussion of my philosophy. Or spreading secondary ideas like no platform or 4 fascisms