9/11

...but you feel the need to tell me I don't either and have to prefix my sentences on the subject with "I believe".

 

Why are you carrying on? You don't know anything.

 

Okay Mr. "I don't talk about thermite".
I agree with MadCap when he said it was obvious what happened right away. I watched the first building fall on TV wondering how so many bombs had been placed and by who.
Only in the following days did my perception begin to get clouted with the jet fuel theory.
I don't need a pissing contest. I'm just keeping abreast with the 9/11 chatter here.

 

I didn't know we were having a "pissing contest"...that wasn't the intention.
I just wondered who you thought did it (not how and why)...
I was only a tad sarcastic when you let slip :
"Except for all the ones that still live in the Middle East that is."
Who are these people you speak of?
You obviously do know something and also have some sort of opinion.

It just felt like you didn't want to get into it or didn't want to be scrutinised.

 

That is where we sent our Armies.

We were not it's cool.

 

That's not what we are talkingt about here.

Good.

 

that's hardly proof that he is guilty of anything... he could just have easily been colluding with the American Government... not saying that he was, just saying that his disappearence proves ZERO...

 

are you for real or joking?... hard to tell

 

what makes you say that?

 

here's another one...

 

and there's me thinking it was factions of the American Government who were responsible for 9/11

 

They could have made useful idiots out of several Muslim fundamentalists.
Who still carried out 9/11?

Seriously, why would it be: "factions of the American Government ."?

 

Well that explains it.

 

well i don't think it was the whole of the American Government because that is not the way covert operations work... strange question...

 

it is possible though, is it not?...

 

When did I say I thought you thought It was the whole of the Government? I know what "factions" means.

 

you asked me the following....

and i responded... i think your knickers are twisted

 

Given we know it was a commercial flight and we know it was on a normal flight upto a certain point, it is unlikely it was poosible to rig the plane so it could be flown remotely.
That sort of equipment takes up a lot of space and takes a lot of time.

I thought you were assuming I thought you thought I thought you thought the whole of the American government.
I might have got my knickers in a twist, though.

 

lol...

how do we know it was a commercial/normal flight? i thought it was a pre-rigged military plane that substituted the "normal one"... what have you read that tells you otherwise... i'd like to read it too if poss...?

 

There isn't anything apart from the voice recordings...and the BBRs...Oh, and the bodies (But, obviously, they could have landed, forced the passengers onto another plane, flew the precise same flight-plan and removed any evidence it wasn't the same plane(s) from the crash site(s)...but that sounds like BS)


American 11
Parts, pilots, Radar coverage, flight route, impact, speeds, times.. etc of the plane that hit WTC 1 (North Tower)
United 175
Parts, pilots, Radar coverage, flight route, impact, speeds, times.. etc. of the plane that hit WTC 2 (South Tower)
American 77
Parts, pilots, Radar coverage, flight route, impact, speeds, times.. etc.

United 93

I'd like to know where you read that it wasn't.