I present to you the astounding idea that 9/11 was in fact due to some angry muslim extremists who noticed that airport security within the US was pretty lax, indoctrinated some fanatics into believing they are sacrificing themselves for the better good and sent them off to hijack 4 planes and fly them into US landmarks. Structural damage combined with the sandwich structure of the floors of the world trade center and the burning jet fuel caused the steel supports to weaken and buckle. Metal expands and loses it's strength when heated, this is why blacksmiths have to heat metal in order to hammer it into shape. The most difficult thing a pilot has to learn is taking off and landing, steering the plane in flight is pretty straightforward and the hijackers could easily have made the pilots navigate for them under the notion that they just wanted to make a scene.
Sorry, but your hypothesis has been debunked time and time again. You offer nothing new to this table. Please go do some of your own research and stop wasting bandwidth. Thank you. www.ae911truth.org
http://www.fireengineering.com/articles/article_display.html?id=130026 If Fire Fighters are skeptical, then so am I.
That article highlights the pragmatic issues that fire fighters face in high rises, such as lightweight trusses that can't be trusted, sprayed on fireproofing that isn't always effective, the 'defend in place' strategy which turned out to be a mistrake on 9/11, the need to improve building codes, the need for better communications, and so on. All of those issues should be thoroughly examined. .
yes metal expands when heated, but steel structures are meant to take a beating like they did without falling. Your not dumb you know that right?
They are meant to survive a fire fuelled by furniture not an impact by an airliner followed by an hour of temperatures above 600 degrees. The impact damaged the structure's fireproofing, it was only a matter of time before it buckled.
so how come buildings in madrid burned for 28 hrs straight? how come their have been 3 steel structures to fall in history and building number 7 was one of them yet had fires that werent even bad compared to "normal" fires.
I read in "The Prince" that it is only prudent to silence your critics when they are telling the truth as all the malcontents will flock to them rather than political opponents with actual knowledge about your machinations, it also makes it easier to spy on those who might cause trouble.
Who paid those Hijackers Credit Card Bills... The 9/11 commission reports that it cost 500,000 dollars to fund the attacks, where did this money come from? How come FBI agents who were investigating them were pulled off of their cases? How come the so called "hijackers" were spotted inside strip clubs and renting porno videos in their hotel rooms, eating pork and drinking liquor? knowing this would prevent them from their "72 virgins" and their everlasting life. How come the 9/11 commission was admittedly bribed by Pakistan to not include any links between the ISI and the hijackers? Why was it reported and never refuted that the Leader of the Pakistani ISI, Mahmoud Ahmed, Wired 100,000 dollars to Mohammed Atta, the leader of the Hijackers? Answer these questions please.
I know this isn't the topic of the board, but I've always wondered how the hell is costs that much to crash somebody else's planes.
Yes, but that's circumstantial....show me any proof of Osama Bin Laden funding it, most people who bought that in 2001 and for the next three years, now even admit if was Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
Also Osama was involved with other terrorist activities and showed up on various videos claiming he did it.