Shhh, people might get the wrong impression and think Im nice or something. Im an evil troll that lives under a bridge and I um ran out of thoughts.
So its wrong to kill cancer cells, aids virus, west nile virus, small pox, hooping cough and other deadly health issues to humans and animals? You say Im fucked up.
Well then killing people is okay since by simple definition people are can be a form of cancer. People can in short destructive to the whole unit (cancerous) thus needing to be removed (killed) and on a larger scale (global) humans act as a cancer to the planet and other life on it for really no apparent good but their own.
Its only wrong because you perceive it to be wrong because you believe humans are special, some superior species that deserves a greater respect. So its good to protect a species that rapes its own for no reason other than the desire to do so not to procreate, to murder not for the survival or betterment of the species but for selfish gains, to be destructive to all other species for comfort and greed and to flex its show of power. A fucked up idea to save and honor a species like that.
Hmm I guess I scared him off or he is still trying to bend his mind the rest of the way around this idea.
ok i agree with some of what you say but if its allright to murder humans who decides who dies and who lives yanknburn you are deeper than i thought i just figured you for some crazy fucker
Like all things it is left to society to decide these things but with this comes further issues. At what level do we stop? Do we kill all murderers and rapists and those who prey upon the handicapped, elderly and the children? Do we kill those who oppose certain religious and political beliefs? Do we kill those who could infect us with a deadly virus as a form of prevention? See its rather easy to justify killing really but at the same time we all have different values of life. Your value on human life is far greater than mine thus our differences. The grand question is what is the real value of human life and at what level do we decide that one life is creating far greater harm on the majority than is worth allowing to live?
the nazis thought like you do they wanted to dispose of the jews because in there eyes the jews were parasites thus there life was less important than the nordic persons
Actually that was more of a fairy tale than the whole truth. Jews were stripped of their money to be used to build a country that was shit house poor then they were exterminated as a means to have a common cause and hide what was done and assisted by the fact of an insane group believing this was the option. So toss the text book in the trash and look at history of countries as individuals rather than using a US history of the world point of view book. The german people were brainwashed into believing that the jews were bad, german children were led to believe that great things would happen for them if they informed on other who spoke out or acted against the party (USSR did this and hell we have our form called the D.A.R.E. program) Children were not informed as to what was going to happen to the people they informed on. Its too easy to limit a certian issue when you dont take into account the entire situation. Germany was not alone in this willing to destroy people. Test were run here in the US thinking it was just a german issue and sadly it was founded that anyone when directed correctly would wound or kill under the right circumstances. These test were preformed at colleges on students and basically students ended up willing to send low voltage into another and then would slowly turn up the juice until it would reach a critical and deadly level. Now the person hooked to the wires was not really being zapped but the people pushing the buttons did not know this. This is actually yet another topic really "would a person kill" I guess.
Actually Nazi (since you like to call it that) had high value for life much like our beliefs. Now the Japanese, Vietnamese, Korean, and some recent people we are dealing with have a far far less value on human life. They believe in the loss of one to better the rest.
During a desperate situation would not anyone have value for a select few? would you save yourself and family before your friends and neighbors?