Why Is Monsanto Evil, But DuPont Isn't?

Discussion in 'Boycott' started by Bilby, Jun 21, 2013.

  1. Bilby

    Bilby Freerangertarian Staff Member Lifetime Supporter Super Moderator


    I have been saying this for ages. Also DuPont had the non drug hemp criminalized because it did not need all the nasty chemicals that cotton does.
    Furthermore, the held patents to CFC's but when the patents were about to expire CFC's became dangerous.

    Maybe all the GM companies are using Monsanto as a whipping boy to divert attention form what all the rest of them are doing.
  2. Tyrsonswood

    Tyrsonswood Senior Moment

    Who said DuPont wasn't evil?
  3. Manservant Hecubus

    Manservant Hecubus Master of Funk and Evil

  4. odonII

    odonII O

    I think the point is - when was the last thread made about DuPont? How often do you hear people here talk about DuPont compared to Monsanto?

    Where are the endless reams of information / boycots / protests etc etc regarding duPont?



    Spot the difference.

    Perhaps the point isn't Dupont isn't - you just would not know by the imbalance between the two.
  5. Manservant Hecubus

    Manservant Hecubus Master of Funk and Evil

    We get what he means.
    I think our point is: If you want a good discussion, don't start it off with a logical fallacy in the title.
  6. odonII

    odonII O

    Lol, sorry, I just read the article. Fair enough.

    I don't think the title of the article/thread is a monumental hurdle to get over.
    We get the point - move on.

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice