Why do I think the left is being herded?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/7865332.stm

I am worried that the left, and it's leadership of "Oh! I want to seem smart, so I am gonna support this taboo idea, and force it to be mainstream for the good of all mankind"

tenets are being steered into something dangerous

 

i once got into an argument with a woman who had ten kids. i told her that's way too many kids. she was being a real **** about how superior she was because she has all those fucking resource-suckers falling out of her coffee-can vagina.

 

ew. coffee can vagina.

 

There aren't too many people, not yet, we just need to stop fucking going everywhere. Stay and home, relax, smoke some weed, you know...

 

It's a misinformation/reverse-psychology article. Malthusian thinking has been around since the turn of the 19th century.

And Prince Charles partially owns (?) the WWF. It's no wonder BBC reporters emulate his accent.

Population control/environmentalism is not discussed in the mainstream...wtf? That was a huge laugh. :hat:

 

1. But consuming is more profitable
2. this is less about overpopulation, and more about the way the left is being herded to think it's their duty to do something about it in the name of being green



these intellectual explanations are very similar to what lead the u.s. to sterilize undesirables in the early half of the 20th century.


my concern of course being that similar atrocities will take place under this banner of superiority.

 

All extremism can lead to some kind of fascism. Including leftist extremism. So, it's not surprising that environmentalist ideology is being manipulated by political factions that have a stake in making people expendable and "resources" (as though there were such a thing apart from human labor) made unavailable.

It's the old destroy humanity in order to save it oxymoron.

 

well, if there are less people, who have more money, the economic process becomes more sustainable, if there is no lower, and only higher, it's hard for people to know how poor they are, and what they have lost in purchasing power etc.

 

FUCK SUSTAINABLE!

The question is sustainable FOR WHOM.

The logical conclusion of environmentalism is none other than third world genocide. No wonder it's not very popular around those parts.

 

oh no, I KNOW that the sustainability is for rich world manipulating fucks

I'm just explaining how it will be sold.

people are already killed by the tens of thousands, and the media doesn't mention it.

 

Nice to hear from someone who doesn't take propaganda at face value. Good on ya! :cheers2:

 

any idea that leaves the gov't in charge is going to be corrupted

 

how come link dont work..

 

T'was porn.

 

Yes, this is the type of tripe the environ-mental mind midgets have been promoting since the 60s; the fallacious idea that there are too many of us and we need to "cull the herd." This plays right into the hands of the elite, who want to drastically reduce the population for their own agenda.

The Left are useful idiots, but this is nothing new. Their beliefs have pretty much always been in line with the New World Order's way of thinking. This isn't to say the average uninformed Leftist possesses the same mentality as that of the elite, rather they are simply gullible and easily duped into getting behind an agenda that is nothing like what it appears to be on the surface.

 

Two of the founding members of the WWF were Prince Bernhard; a former Nazi SS officer and founder of the Bilderberg Group, as well as Jullian Huxley; founding member of UNESCO and Aldous Huxley's brother.

 

Most of this nonsense about "overpopulation" came out of the Club of Rome, beginning with their 1972 book, Limits to Growth, which was later found to contain all sorts of skewed and made up disinformation. A lot of it was computer models that were created with the desired outcome in mind, which is that there are too many people. These people are all eugenicists with an agenda that has nothing to do with saving the environment.

 

I think in a sense there is overpopulation, but I'm talking about the 7 kid families who get benefits and can't support all the kids. You're allowed to stop.

(I only say this because I know people like this).

 

it's still fucking gross to see some fat tabby giving birth to 10 kids.

 

I agree.
EDIT: Also, my friend gets tonnes of bs from her (large) family. I'd not want to do that to my kids and the amount of time you have with each child, I'm sure it's inevitable that it happens to some.