White slavery and being robbed of ones own history

I know there is tons of stuff they never teach in school. I guess I should have figured..

White people were also kept as slaves. Sad fact is, all races kept slaves all throughout history...But we never learn this in HS, at least I did not and a lot of my friends were unaware. I won a History High Achievement award in HS, feels like a sham and a scam now, feel like throwing it away the more I learn about what was not told in class!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDGQmDArU-o"]White Slavery 101* what they never told you in History Class part II - YouTube

"In the 16th – 18th century, Africans enslaved 1.5 million White Europeans in the Barbary Slave Trade. African Muslims raided up the coastlines of Europe, particularly the British Isles but even as far as Iceland, kidnapping and enslaving White European.."

"When the Trans-Atlantic slaveships docked at African slave-markets to buy slaves, they bought slaves who were already slaves. It was Arab Muslims and Black Africans themselves who captured members of rival tribes and took them to the coastal slave-markets to sell to the Whites and Jews"

"Only 5% of the black slaves transported across the Atlantic actually went to the modern U.S. Most in fact went to Latin America to serve Hispanic slave-owners."

 

It doesn't bode well for the controllers to have people know this, as it would pose a disruption to the current white vs. black race agenda being used to promote divide and conquer in America.

White people cannot be slaves, too. They can only be the evil oppressors walking all over the colored races.

Writer Michael Hoffman wrote a good book on this subject, titled They Were White, and They Were Slaves.

 

Most of the slaves in Africa were sold by Africans themselves. And most slaves going across the Atlantic ended up in South America (Brazil being the highest) - 5% went to modern day USA. These are facts a lot of people do not know.

 

Yup, nor will they never know because the schools won't teach it, and the news won't talk about it. People don't know, and they won't ever because it isn't in the interests of the system for people to know. Racial strife is such a powerful tool for social engineering.

 

The Barbary pirates slave deals are knowledge, not a secret chapter of history.


The largest destinations for African slaves were Brazil #1 and the US #2, neither of which countries were Hispanic, nor were there many Hispanic people in the 1700s.

 

And also the Barbary slave trade wasn't apart of American history, so less relevant...

 

Of course, honky comes along with a boat load of gold and says I’ll pay you mint for each slave - WTF do you think they're going to say - no because in the future we'll be judged as harshly as the whites who enslaved them for generations


Hotwater

 

A good number of slaves were caught by rival tribes and/or owned as slaves by other tribes.

 

Slaves always lived with the hope of escaping and reuniting with their families and friends and many of them did.

Hope turned to hopelessness after the atlantic crossing


Hotwater

 

your tadpole school sucked bro or you have been living under a lilly pad ...
e

 

Whats your actual point? I was under the impression everyone knew this.
America still has a lot more slaves today than in the 1800s. Their just not called slaves anymore.

slavery (ˈsleɪvərɪ) — n 1. the state or condition of being a slave; a civil relationship whereby one person has absolute power over another and controls his life, liberty, and fortune 2. the subjection of a person to another person, esp in being forced into work 3. the condition of being subject to some influence or habit 4. work done in harsh conditions for low pay

We live in a nation with ridiculous taxes, ruled by a government with the "right" to put you in jail if you dont work to pay them, the right to steal wages out of your paychecks without your permission to do with what they please. We have to pay them to own property. (city stickers, wheel taxes, tags, insurance laws, property taxes, buying/renewing licenses, healthcare plans, social security, permits, etc.)

Also the main reason majority of slaves in america were black is for a few real reasons not their skin color. Its because black people are naturally resistant to malaria therefore made better slaves. White people and indians were much more likely to die working in the harsh conditions. Black people also would be slaves. America first tried to enslave indians "captured" however indians refused. They would rather be tortured or killed than conform to their "masters" will. One of the main reasons for this is as you mentioned how more slaves went to latin america than southeast US we know today for slavery. Latin america was MUCH more harsh then southeast US. Slaves knew this and as a control method "masters" would threaten to sell there slaves to the sugar cane farmers of latin america if they didnt work hard and follow the rules in US. This is also what discouraged slaves from running. Knowing if they were caught they would be shipped off to the Caribbean to work under even worse conditions with harsher masters.

 

No sure which 1700s your looking into too... But there were a lot of hispanic people in the 1700s. They werent mexicans obviously but Spain was one of the first countries to settle into america as well as the tens of thousand of latin american indians. Mostly all of them died due to the introduction of European diseases. I mean why do you think there are so many Hispanic people in Latin America today? White men settled the areas than moved away for Hispanics to move in? People don't settle areas to move away.

 

First humans appeared 200,000 years ago. And developed certain social behaviours 50,000 to 100,000 years ago

If you say "modern Man" appeared about 60,000 years ago, the last 500 years represents less than 1% of that time span.

Most of human history we have no clue about, there would have been slavery the whole time, so most of the history of slavery we have no clue about

Then there is the peroid 60,000 to 1.8 million years ago, groups of different hominids running around, some smarter more social than others....you dont really need fossil evidence to work out the kinds of things they would have done to each other

 

Just on the race thing, there is compelling evidence we arent all exactly the same species anyway

The origin of all homosapiens can be traced back to the san people of central/southern africa. With the second big migration of homosapiens out of africa went on to mix with neanderthals in Europe, denisova in asia and the pacific

Most europeans have around 4% neanderthal dna, africans do not, melanesians have around the same amount of denisovan dna, africans do not

In an evolutionary sense, the san people of central and south africa are the most evolved humans, the rest of us are the product of them interbreeding with lesser hominids to varying degrees

Only by the smallest of fractions, but Europeans (including those that colonised North and South America), Africans, Asians (including offshoots that colonised the pacific) are all different species of humans.....not that anyone will ever dare try class Europeans as Homo proto-sapiens

A lot of europe's early history would have been genetically superior recently migrated southern africans ruling over whiter skinned neanderthals, anywhere from 200,000 years ago, up to 10,000 years ago

 

This is all speculation really though no proof. Its not what i believe =P respect your beliefs though

 

Or maybe they were barbarians who enslaved each other? Until black people stop blaming white people for everything, the problems will continue.

 

what do these have to do with all this?

 

I liked Stephen Spielberg's the Colour Purple better.:afro:

 

well american schools do have this thing called world history, so there is that.

also vanilla,

every time you say san people i think of tusken raiders.

 

someone clearly never used their xbox to play the sims