Your boyfriend is into downloading porn all week, then when you visit him on the weekend, he can't cum? He says that he loves having sex with me and that it feels really good, he just can't cum. I think it's because he's taking care of himself all week long, that he just doesn't have it in him when I visit for the weekend. Any suggestions?
It depends.. is his orgasm here the only issue? Or are there other issues u haven't mentioned? It's just that your post doesn't actually say and I get the feeling that there are other things u're not happy with.
Well there's not really anything I'm unhappy about other than we don't have sex that often, and he doesn't come. When we spend time together we're really happy, we love each other very much. He says it might be because of his allergy meds, but he doesn't seem to have a problem getting himself off. He says it's not me, and I know that I'm hot...so I'm not sure. He also says it's not a problem, but I'd like him to be as pleased as I am. It's a problem to me anyways.
my bf is like that... we have a long distance relationship, so i cant blame him when he has to masturbate when im not around... then wen we meet up, its always difficult for him to cum when we have sex, or even wen i give him a hand or blow job. and just like you, i feel really upset wen i cant make him cum, i feel like i've let him down. but he keeps reasurring me that he enjoys every minute of sex and foreplay, even if he doesnt cum. im sure it's the same with your bf. as long as you're both enjoying what you do, then there's no worries
thats so beautiful I think its quite selfish of him and although I can't see why u need cum in ur life, I do see how ud feel mistreated. and I don't think from his male standpoint understands or sees how anything could possibly be a problem. Tell him. Tell him how much u want the cum
CYA, you should familiarise with what Blix has said then obviously. http://www.cnn.com/2003/WORLD/meast/09/18/sprj.irq.blix.bush/ http://www.news24.com/News24/World/Iraq/0,,2-10-1460_1345303,00.html At the end of the day, the typical right wing argument about Saddam's breach of earlier resolutions is illegitimate by reason that the ceasefire was set and owned by the UN secuity council as a whole, not, as Blix rightly contended, any individual member state. Thus the UK and US had no legal nor moral authority to assume to act against Iraq without security council approval. If the ceasefire had been with ourselves or the Brits, fine. It was not and therefore the criminality in launching a war of aggression against another sovereign state which posed no viable threat to our soil is all our own. Let us also recall that by advancing this argument of failure to adhere to UN resolutions when it suits unilateralist warmongers' justifications for militant aggression, true intellectual honesty demands that they apply this same criteria to Israel which has ignored more UN resolutions than any single nation in the world for far longer than 12 years.
