I've been interested in RCs and designer drugs for a long time and i have tried many of them from diffferent categories but haven't really tried the RC stimulants like 4-MA yet.. are any of them worth it...im looking for something that comes close to the tweak you get from crystal meth, stuff like methylone i would consider a different category. if theres an rc that gets you geetered out like dope i think im gonna have to try it...
idk...MDPV is similar [intense stimulant]..but not the same. i mean no disrespect, but can't you just ask google? ...i'm not trying to judge anybody, but you should know that the only thing that's going to be exactly like methamphetamine, is METHAMPHETAMINE.. it's MA's beta-ketone analog is supposed to be notably different. why not just find some meth if thats what you want?
i only know one person who said this and they were an american who i was friends with in the uk when mephedrone was legal. i got them a gram and they thought it was exactly like meth. try mephe.
^^one person....they? "geetered out" sounds pretty funny. can you explain what it means? i've never done meth or many stimulants at all
"they" is an appropriate pronoun for a single person it is just one step removed in terms of information from "he" or "she", lacking even gender data
Evenin', officer. If you actually took meth, you probably wouldn't call it dope. And if you actually said geetered out, you probably wouldn't also say designer drugs, and try to use that phrase interchangeably with "RC". I suggest you go to mcdonalds for a while, and then go to the doctor, and they'll prescribe you the highest quality methamphetamine, strait from your local pharmacy.
yeah just find some adderoll. shit's speed. i dunno if it is 'like meth' as i've never done methamphetamine (straight, i think i've had some molly with it) - but that shit is pretty nasty and i know is similar chemically. meth is such a lame thing
Actually that's a common grammatical error. It's incorrect to refer to one person as they. The only correct way to refer to one person in the english language in the 3rd person is with either he or she. /grammarnazi edit: Just so I'm not completely off topic, I have to agree that mephedrone is a lot like meth. I've been told by several people who used to do meth that meph + mdpv is more powerful than meth, and that mephedrone on its own is very similar. Mephedrone is my favorite stimulant. I would recommend it, or if it's illegal in your area 4-mec is a good substitute.
they and their can be singular... At least I think so. Other languages have the same word for they in plural and singular. I think that while some people might consider it a grammar mistake, its subjective. Language evolves and changes as time goes by. Some of the best writers of our time use singular they/their, and I think that should define the meaning more-so than what old school grammar nazi's consider it to be. I've read quite a few books with statements like this, "As peter crossed the wooden bridge over the fire, his clothes became engulfed in flames. He immediately took off his clothes as most people would do when their clothes are on fire." Would this be considered wrong? Another word that comes to mind when talking about plural and singular gender neutral pronouns is you. Do you think its wrong? I'm wondering who I was asking... btw, I think you is ok for referring to a single person too right eatlysergic? Maybe not if you only use you for plural.
Btw, meth is the best stimulant in existence... Idk why everyone here hates meth so much >_< Oh yeah I do, because they had family and friends that used it and they have, "seen what it can do." Maybe because no one else has seen this? Ironic almost every psych has pretty strong stimulant properties. But I am not being standoffish, just have a different opinion. But lets start the flames
I feel very confident in saying that you cannot use they to refer to only one person. You must use he or she. The gender neutral form of the 3rd person in English is simply "it", and most people don't like to be referred to as "it" so the only correct way is to pick a gender and use that. The way around this is to say "he or she" or "he/she" or something like that but it's unnecessary and frowned upon for that reason. I know this from a few really great English teachers that I had in high school and one that I have now. In the sentence about peter the use of the word "their" is correct because its antecedent is "most people" which is plural. You can be used to refer to a single person or to refer to multiple people, so depending on the subject it could go either way. Most people where I'm from would simply use y'all to refer to multiple people in the second person, but to use you in that case is grammatically correct. Sorry if this is terribly boring to anyone. I'm the son of an English major so I've been hearing this type of crap my whole life and it would seem as though I've come to like it.:2thumbsup:
^^beat me to it again. i don't consider myself a grammar nazi either...i don't like it when people correct me on my grammar, and i make a few mistakes.. but yeah, their is ok to refer to people, but not to a singular person. sometimes it makes intuitive sense to say 'their' but technically it's incorrect. and the plural of you could be you guys. i've never seen or tried meth. more exposure i've had to it is Breaking Bad. do you think the stimulant effect from LSD is AS stimulant as meth?
If I had some meth I think this grammar debate would be more interesting... I bet I could score meth easier than I could pot at the moment, I don't even smoke the shit but I can tell you craigslist is your friend. I don't find LSD as stimulating as meth but there isn't as big of a difference as one might expect. I could see how meth could be a tricky one in not noticing your mashing your teeth, shaking, spike in heart rate and all that. The only time I did meth I drove and I was going 75 on the freeway but felt like I was going 30 mph, almost the opposite effect I get from pot.
I think you just reiterated what was said "antecedently" I still don't agree personally. Point is that language is used to convey a message, which is easily understood by they... wut... Acid feels waaaaayyyyy more like a stim than meth. I have to use like 3 times the normal dose I would to get high for stuff like teeth grinding. Versus I can take like one hit of acid and be grinding my teeth for 12 hours. I also feel cracked out when I am on acid vs meth. Meth is the smoothest drug out. I would personally say that acid is more stimulant than meth, for sure.
^ I think you are just being reactionary but I'll play along, if you truly believe this what do you think is cause for the infamous 'meth mouth' and the commonly severe gum decay that you don't see in LSD users? I was watching a documentary on meth yesterday actually in between commercials of various other shows, they showed some 28 year old meth user with all his top row of teeth completely gone, that takes meth skills.
i know a guy who has lost all of his teeth due to chronic weed smoking and i mean chronic!! 20-50 bongs a day and also smoking cigs as well. has done stims and stuff a fair amount but not much really, it's definitely all related to smoking and the guy was.... 24 when it happened.