So here's everyone's favourite question in my HSC...as soon as we start to talk about the Ramayana, this eventually comes up. So, what do you all think, was it right for Sri Rama to give up Sita? IMHO it was. I think it was a lesson in selflessness. His first duty was to his people and he gave up something he love and longed for for his people. This was his reasoning which he explained to Lakshman... and I can understand. But this reasoning has been argued against by others, so I thought I'd bring this up for discussion.