UFO Abductees Are Not 'All Kooks' (Stephen Hawking)!

How do we know we haven't already found them? There cities under the water found and nobody know what they are. Perhaps one of them is Atlantis? Or one of the other ones?

Fact is nobody actually knows where Atlantis was located, but underwater cities have been found in every ocean on the globe. They are nameless. Maybe one of them was Atlantis? They've discovered pyramid city ruins. There's endless possibilities and what people are seriously just going to sit there and go there's no possibility? That's Just rediculous. We may as well not even bother doing archaeology if the attitude is "we aren't going to learn anything new and don't take anything we find too seriously because it was all from the lands of make believe".

 

But those myths were what scribes wrote as quite real events. That's why they're a myth, because when they wrote them, a myth meant true to life. Don't you see how the history your taught is misconstrude? My way of thinking only sounds kookoo because that's what they want you to believe. And they've completely misrepresented what the word myth actually means.

 

Mythos is Latin, not Greek and also, try again.

 

In fact reading through that there's nothing in those definitions that would link mythos to any sort of fantasy or fiction at all because like I said earlier, our ancients told history and events through oral tradition.

But I get it, I get it. It's 2020 now, what did they know back then.

 

While growing up I heard several local radio interviews with Betty Hill and it was clear her mental faculties were in a bit of a decline.

She would make all kinds of claims, and occasionally would take out groups of people to where the alien ships were scheduled to land, or point to the night skies and say “there they are” but it was apparent what she, and everyone else was seeing were planes that recently took off from Logan airport in Boston...lol..

 

Well, like I said previous, you don't take the story exactly literally word for word, you have to actually step back and take a look at the big picture and at the events surrounding the myth.

It's like Beowulf. Surely we all believe there are not shape shifting sorceress dragons, but what was the myth of Beowulf actually telling? Most likely a story a about the oppressive rulers and governments of the time. And then let's see what's happened in Denmark, archaeologists have found what appears to be the foundations of a great mead hall.

So that's another example of where mythology starts to become a reality. The mead hall may have existed, but the sectional rulers of the lands we depicted as a shape shifting dragon. There's shape shifters in almost every culture.

 

It's like the bible. Many people these days pass that off as just stories don't they? Yet the bible is one of the most important historic pieces of literature that we have and is used to trace historic events, places, locations, genealogy. But it's basically looked at as myth. So why is it held in so much regard as to historic evidence and documentation? And like ice explained previously, the bible is basically rewritten mythological literature written down and documents several thousands of years before Christianity. So why is it so important if it's just make believe?

 

And like I said previously also, Greek and Roman mythology always seems to be a leading genre of mythology, but those tales are relatively new, their origins, like the bible, can be traced much much farther back. So I tend not to take the reconstructed mythology of newer religions as seriously because just like Chinese Whispers, the stories expand and become more and more entrenched with idealogies.

 

Also, your definition you posted is of "myth" not "mythos" in which the word "myth" derived from.

So as you can see, as mythology expands through cultures, so do words and meanings.

 

I dunno why you keep posting definitions that galvanise what I said?

 

During the making of the film 'close encounters' a lot of studies were carried out in order to produce a sense of reality and possibility.
However, one of the most interesting studies (that was largely ignored) was the case of the guy who was abducted from his car and probed in an alien craft. However, their was a passenger in the car who claimed that while they stopped for several hours, he did not loose track of time and his friend was drifting in and out of a conscious state, but he never left the vehicle.
To me, this indicated that his abduction was mental, rather than physical. I found that completely plausible.
This hypothesis could explain a great deal, including ghosts and reincarnation. We know without doubt that both of these have a lot of evidence, but I feel that considering the brain and the body separately results in them making some REAL sense.
Along with heredity, we all have very different talents, so our brain must have data from other sources. The most interesting thing is that they always go back, rather than forward, so perhaps the great musicians of today somehow have data from the likes of Tchaikovsky, while my personal achievements have let to people accusing me of applying the logic of Brunel.
To confuse matters even more, we seem to have a third life that exists in our dreams and like our talent, it seems to exist in the past, sometimes bringing back people who are no longer with us.
I also worked on an Australian film about reincarnation. It affected me greatly, particularly because the woman who died in her previous life at one of the German concentration camps, was focused purely on her mental state, rather than the physical side of the demise of her human body. After being shown in the UK. it was discovered that the woman who relived her experiences at the concentration camp died the following week, without ever coming out of her hypnotic state.
I have made numerous attempts to trace the film today, but without any success. One person told me that the whole thing was a complete hoax, while others said that it was banned by the Australian government,
The one hing that I do know, is that ABC Sydney can produce a copy of a soap opera, but they cannot trace the film. When I pushed them, they soon started ignoring my calls and emails.

As you said, we do not seem to be told the truth, but I suspect that it is because no one knows it.
Perhaps human nature drops a red mist, once we get outside our comfort zone.

 

Well, if we don't know the "truth" then I certainly don't believe in perpetuating our own lies and history to compensate for things we don't know. But that's what it is to be human isn't? We have a burning desire to know answers.