there are KIDS in the sex forums!

correct me if i'm wrong, but isn't this supposed to be an adults-only forum? thanks to minors being allowed into this forum, we have such thought-provoking posts as "eating out fat chicks." need i say more? i understand that there are teens out there who ARE mentally and sexually mature, but i move that the mods of this forum and the webmaster team up to make it so teens and kids can't get in here. and remember, if they get caught fucking around on here, the webmaster could get in a lot of trouble! just some food for thought.

 

1. The webmaster is Dutch... so no trouble to get into.
2. The internet is full of sexual content, much worse than words on a forum.
3. These are free speech/ expression forums... sexuality is a part of it.

 

4. You can change your age at anytime. Now shut up.

 

There are worse places for kids to learn about sex. Catholic Church for example...

 

"eating out fat chicks." ROFL

 

Catholic church, lol. there are also old peole in young hippies

 

eh, if you really wanna go to a forum where they do their best to get rid of under 18 people, you can always go to clitical .com and find their forum site

 

i agree.....they should be watching how to kill people on tv

 

*shits pants* guess what? kids have sex too!

 

Your not going to be able to stop them. They will just lie about their age then. And like Brave said, these forums are about free speech and expression.

 

...and there's 'adults' acting like kids.

Why do think there's the phrase 'moron majority'?

 

*chokes on soda* yeah seriously, why should kids learn about sex here in a friendly peer environment if they can get the bullshit on tv instead?

 

If you're mature enough to feel horny you are mature enough to participate in a discussion about sex.

 

1. unless I have another definition of 'webmaster'.. the webmaster isn't Dutch Skip is the main man here, owner of the website.. dude that pays the bills.. he's American and lives in Spain now (true, he lived in Amsterdam before that, doesn't make him Dutch though ). However, the server IS located in the Netherlands and therefor falls under Dutch laws.

2. Exactly.. plus the only thing you can do to prevent kids from entering is saying 'click here if you are under 18'.. hehehe.. sure.. every curious kid is gonna click that! And every kid can fake their age here so there's nothing you can do about it either, even if you wanted to!

3. True.. very true.. on hipforums there's about everything, including this.

The only thing that I worry about is underaged people posting (semi) nude pics here.. since that is against the law in this country as well. When I see it I talk about it to that person.. reminding them of their age and that they might get hipforums in trouble.. there is a simple solution for that: make sure you hotlink instead of upload it to this server.. since the server that has the pics on it is in trouble

 

This shouldnt ban teens and kids as some of you say. well, only really the first poster. Im 15, but its not like I don't know what anyone is talking about in the sex forums. You obviously dont know teenagers today, since most of them are already having sex by the tmie their 15. Stop with the bullshit about how their too young to be exposed to that. Sheltering kids just makes it harder for them when their older.

 

I'm down with having kids in the forums discussing sex -- better they get accurate information here than the tripe they feed kids in sex ed these days. But, yeah... under-age folks posting nude pics is problematic.

You access a page that has those photos on it, and, legally, you are in possession of child pornography. Not too cool.

Skip could also get in trouble for having minors accessing adult materials; this sort of thing was looking to be a big problem for free adult sites a couple years back. (John Ashcroft, at one point, had a staff of 8 whose only job was to catalogue free adult sites.) Then, Ashcroft got sidetracked, and then he got gone, so, I don't know how those cases are going to pan out.

Would it make more sense to have a mutual-respect agreement where minors on the forum just agree not to post pics of their nekkid selves, and, if they look at nude pics, at least keep quiet about that in the threads?

 

i think the original poster was complaining about how letting underage people in here allows stupid threads to start. maybe they were generalizing by lumping all teens under this label of immaturity, but threads that are stupid and pointless are a waste of space, free speech or not. but you are right, free speech does allow for EVERYONE to have free speech, and unfortunately, the word "everyone" includes "idiots." *sigh*

 

Because *gasp* Heaven forbid a child should hear anything about sex.
Sex is out there, and most kids know what it is. It's stupid for parents or other adults to try to censor everything that has to deal with sex in the world. For example (it isn't this bad on here, but it's just a story...) the Victoria's Secret in my town almost got shut down for putting lingerie displays in the windows and having posters in the background that said, "What is Sexy?" It's incredible. Kids know a LOT more than you might think we do...

 

Forgive me, I thought that Skip was Dutch... but I did mean the server, in general.

I agree with you though...underaged kids should not be allowed to post pics here, and that's why we need moderators here... but other than that...I see no problem.

 

Why moderators? I think we, the 'normal posters' can help out as well.. it's 'our community' right? I approach one of the underage posters a while ago and explained to her that her posting a booby pic of herself (she was 15 I think) was perfectly understandeble and all, but that she might endanger the forum. She fully understood, agreed, apologised and took them away. No mod intervention needed