The Admitted Controlled Demolition of WTC-7: The Smoking Gun

Discussion in 'America Attacks!' started by Pressed_Rat, Dec 28, 2004.

  1. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?


    Of all the evidence suggesting government involvement in the horrific attacks on September 11th, 2001, none is more revealing than World Trade Center (WTC) leaseholder Larry Silverstein’s admission that WTC-7 was “pulled.” To “pull” refers to the controlled demolition of a building, and is universally used when referring to these controlled demolitions. Silverstein’s admission can be heard and witnessed on the PBS documentary entitled America Rebuilds. It reads:

    I remember getting a call from the, er, fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, "We've had such terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it." And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building collapse.

    Here is the actual clip(s) of Larry Silverstein’s admission, taken from the aforementioned documentary:

    Of course this was not the explanation the public was given.

    WTC-7 was one of the several buildings -- aside from the Twin Towers -- that made up the World Trade Center complex, and was located nearly two whole blocks away from the towers. Building 7 collapsed in the early evening of September 11th, no more than 8 hours following the collapse of the north and south towers. It was the third building to collapse. The official government explanation claims that the collapse was due to small fires which resulted from the collapse of the towers. Apparently, we were led to believe that small fires are what leveled the building.

    Never before has a steel-structure building collapsed because of fire damage alone.

    Footage taken hours prior to the collapse of WTC-7 shows minimal damage to the building, aside from some small fires visible on the lower floors of the 47 story high-rise building.

    Now that we know that WTC-7 was indeed rigged and brought down with demolition charges, we must ask ourselves the million-dollar question, which is why? It is common fact that the preparation for a controlled demolition takes weeks. The buildings’ structure must first be analyzed before the charges are placed. Are we supposed to believe that these charges were planted within the 8-hour period following the collapse of the towers, with the building on fire? Controlled demolitions take weeks, sometimes months, to plan and prepare.

    Let’s now take a look at the collapse of WTC-7: (video broadcast on CBS) (video broadcast on NBC) (video broadcast on CBS)

    As you can see, the building collapses almost perfectly, and very much like the towers themselves collapsed. This footage alone is evidence enough of a controlled demolition. Buildings don’t collapse from fire, and definitely not like this.

    Now, let's take a look at a still photo taken just as the building was beginning to collapse.


    As you can see, halfway through Building 7's 6.5-second plunge, streamers suggestive of demolition charges can be clearly seen at the face of the building.

    With the evidence that has been provided above, we now know with absolute certainty that we have been flat-out lied to by our government.

    Why should we not believe that the Twin Towers -- which collapsed in a similar manner -- were not also brought down via demolition charges?

    It’s not speculation to say that following the attacks on the Twin Towers there were firefighters reporting explosions going off around them while they were inside the buildings, before either of them had collapsed. Such firefighters were interviewed live on TV that morning, reporting bombs going off in the building. Of course we never saw any of this footage ever again.

    In the documentary entitled 9-11, which is by the Naudet Brothers of France, a group of firefighters refer to the collapse of the towers being “like a controlled demolition,” describing the implosion of each floor in rapid succession.

    Structural engineers from all around the world have long-questioned the government’s “official” explanation into why the towers had collapsed. It is a known fact steel doesn’t begin to melt until around 1,300 degrees Celsius (approximately 2,400 Fahrenheit), which is a much higher temperature than what jet fuel burns at (approximately 800 Fahrenheit), most of which was burned off in the fireball that resulted from the planes striking the towers.

    Of course there is also much suspicion that points to the planes that hit the towers not being the planes that we were told that hit. As Dave vonKleist points out in his documentary entitled 9/11 In Plane Site, Flight 175, which hit the South Tower at 9:03 AM, clearly had something attached to its underside, which is completely inconsistent with the anatomy of a Boeing 767. Photographic analysis concluded that the object, or “pod” that was attached to the bottom of the plane was not caused by shadow or trick of light. It was an actual 3-dimensional object attached to the underside of this plane.

    Of course there was numerous reports on the morning of 9/11, stating that this was not a commercial jetliner. According to an on-site reporter named Mark Burnback -- who was then reporting for the FOX News Network -- the plane which he witnessed strike the South Tower was not a commercial airliner. He reported to see no windows on the plane, and described it to be more like a cargo plane with a blue logo on the front of it.

    Nearly the same exact thing was also reported live on TV by several eyewitneses on that very morning, as the events were still unfolding. Yet, this was all later swept aside and we never heard about it again.

    Let us all keep in mind that the transponders on the planes were deactivated before striking their targets. Is it out of the realm of possibility that the planes that were supposedly "hijacked" were in reality landed at remote locations, and that the planes that struck the towers were actually unmanned, remote controlled aircraft serving as decoys? Many 9-11 researchers believe this to be the case. This also ties in with the collapse of building 7, as this is where the NYC Emergency Command Center was located on the 23rd floor. It is believed that if the planes that crashed into the Twin Towers were piloted remotely, that it was done from WTC-7. The demolition would have destroyed whatever evidence that would have pointed to the real perpetrators.

    Perhaps most shocking of all is a news report by Cleveland’s 9News from the morning of September 11th, stating that a plane had landed at Cleveland Hopkins Airport with the report of a bomb on board. The plane was none other than Flight 93; the flight that had supposedly crashed in Shanksville, PA that morning:

    At Cleveland Hopkins Airport
    Plane Lands In Cleveland - Bomb Feared Aboard
    Reported by 9News Staff
    Web produced by:Liz Foreman
    9/11/01 11:43:57 AM

    A Boeing 767 out of Boston made an emergency landing Tuesday at Cleveland Hopkins International Airport due to concerns that it may have a bomb aboard, said Mayor Michael R. White.

    White said the plane had been moved to a secure area of the airport, and was evacuated.

    United identified the plane as Flight 93. The airline did not say how many people were aboard the flight.

    United said it was also "deeply concerned" about another flight, Flight 175, a Boeing 767, which was bound from Boston to Los Angeles.

    On behalf of the airline CEO James Goodwin said: "The thoughts of everyone at United are with the passengers and crew of these flights. Our prayers are also with everyone on the ground who may have been involved.

    "United is working with all the relevant authorities, including the FBI, to obtain further information on these flights," he said.​

    Can it now be said beyond the shadow of a doubt that our government flat-out lied to us, if they weren’t completely responsible for the September 11th attacks altogether? The evidence I provided above -- aside from footage taken from the Pentagon on that morning -- is the most significant of all physical evidence pointing to government involvement in the attacks. I feel it is the evidence that is most likely to open people’s eyes up to what really happened on that fateful morning in 2001.

    Related links: and History/WTC7Fairytale.htm
  2. dangermoose

    dangermoose Is a daddy

  3. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?

    That is the big question!

    That question applies to most of, if not all of the flights. The answer is, I have no idea. But it would not be impossible for them to have landed the planes in a remote location (at an airforce base or something) and simply killed off all the passengers by nerve gassing them. Or, they could have crashed the planes into the ocean via remote control. I could keep speculating, but the fact is, I don't know. I don't think anybody does know, except for those who were involved.
  4. homebudz

    homebudz Hip Forums Supporter HipForums Supporter

    The whole 9-11 thing was contrived by our govt.The best way to control the population is with fear.
  5. green_thumb

    green_thumb kill your T.V.

    Interesting, interesting.

    BTW, Pressed_Rat, I like your sig, awesome book, I'm working my way through it. I'll finish it before next semester starts. It is a very important book.
  6. atropine

    atropine Member

    quite interesting.. just one thing though..

    i remember being told on this forum, and through many of your links pressed, that the planes could only be remote piloted from NORAD, but now im being told they would be piloted from WTC-7...
  7. matthew

    matthew Almost sexy

  8. RevoMystic

    RevoMystic Member

    matt, of course it's horrid. We're talking about a "Reichstag" incident! Imagine if the entire planet found out that certain rogue elements of the U.S. establishment not only "knew" ahead of time, but were the perpetrators!!! The American Empire would fall within a week.

    We're taking a risk just by even discussing this here!

    One thing though, they did an extraordinarily sloppy job covering their own tracks. There is so much evidence.
  9. soliloquy

    soliloquy Banned

    Here is the single biggest problem with conspiracy theories .. If more than two people know something it's not a secret anymore.. Imagine how many people it would take to pull something like that off.. literally hundreds..... funny how we almost never solve conspiracy theories,, JFK or Diana for instance.. We all know something is amiss and yet the children of our children will be still asking the same questions !!!! Even if someone came forward with undeniable evidence, knowone would believe him anyway, because we would consider it another conspiracy theory,, and so the circle is formed, to be reran at every media quiet spell ....
  10. RevoMystic

    RevoMystic Member

    hopefully that's a trend that'll breathe its last breath sometime soon. Because, we really are living in the "age of the conspiracy". All the signs are there. It's almost blatantly obvious. Well, at least the veil is now very thin. The only thing that's standing in the way of a politically charged public is the corporate media who STILL continue to be nothing but talking heads representing establishment voices and agendas. That is, other than Lou Dobbs who also has his own limitations of what he can say on his program.
  11. Pressed_Rat

    Pressed_Rat Do you even lift, bruh?


    To think that it would have taken "literally hundreds" is a total misconception. This reality is, it likely involved no more than 12-20 people in the right place at the right time.

    As Jim Hoffman points out on his website:

    Operation Pyramid

    How the Attack Might Have Been Engineered

    The case that the 9/11/01 attack was an inside job can be made quite apart from any specific theory as to how it was accomplished, by simply demonstrating that only insiders had the means and opportunity to execute key elements of the attack. The true nature of such an operation is undoubtedly hidden behind layer upon layer of cover story, and its details may never be discovered. Speculative theories of the operation, while not verifiable, nonetheless can be useful in answering important questions about the attack, such as how many people it required.

    Operation Pyramid is such a theory. It shows that although the attack employed a variety of sophisticated communications and weapons technologies, all of these technologies were available "off-the-shelf", having been developed by secret programs ostensibly for other purposes. Specific tasks required to fulfill the mission were outsourced to companies providing strict confidentiality and working on a need-to-know basis.

    Operation Pyramid shows that, through their positions of access in the military command structure, a very small group of people would have been able to appropriate these technologies to carry out the attack. While the attack is engineered by a core of only a dozen people, vast numbers of people facilitate the attack and cover-up, for the most part unknowingly, by simply doing what they normally do in their positions: promote and protect their agencies and the status quo. The public at large participates in the cover-up by failing to question the attack and instead believing the comfortable myth of bin Laden. Operation Pyramid contrasts with Professor A.K. Dewdney's Operation Pearl, which requires large numbers of insiders.

  12. matthew

    matthew Almost sexy

    imho it is the fact that once highly secretive inteligence is now mostly in the public domain .. and the fact that americans have had far greater access to such information ... whole constructs stretching back decades can be orchestrated and manipulated .. We in the UK have not had such access to our information (this is changing) ..give us time and we probably shal equal you guys ?. All these things are way to americentric for my liking..

    John Fabian:

    Did you see any UFOs?
    No UFOs. I'm not a believer in extraterrestrials and I do not believe that we have been visited or that we will be visited any time soon. In spite of all the TV hype over what may have happened in the deserts of Nevada and New Mexico, I have seen all the reports and none of them is true. I had clearance to see everything.

    National Security Council (NCS), the military and intelligence policy-making and control group for national and international security, which reports directly to the President, its secret 5412 Committee (which directs black [covert] operations), and its PI-40 Subcommittee (aka MJ-12: which exercises policy direction and control of the UFO Cover-Up).

    Is he merely a pawn in a vast conspiracy or is he telling the truth..i would go for the dull answer, he is being honest.

    I would have thought i would have or you would have had a bullet in the back of the head by now ? (yeah that was sarcasm ...sorry).

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice