Stop War on Iran online petition - sign up from allover the world

Solve et Coagula · Feb 25, 2006

Stop War on Iran online petition - sign up from allover the world

http://stopwaroniran.org/petition.shtml

Its always worth a try...

catstevens · Apr 3, 2006

Solve et Coagula

Solve et Coagula said:

Stop War on Iran online petition - sign up from allover the world
Click to expand...

Solve et Coagula said:

http://stopwaroniran.org/petition.shtml
Its always worth a try...
Click to expand...

Very Good, may Allah bless you brother =)

Yours Sincerely,

Cat Stevens

taxrefund90 · Aug 12, 2006

but what if iran tries to wipe israel off the face of the earth? should we still appease to iran like the u.n. has?

BraveSirRubin · Aug 13, 2006

There is no war on Iran. There should be one if Iran keeps on developing nuclear "facilities".

gardener · Aug 13, 2006

War in Iran? But may Allah bless you by all means, I guess he's not aware there is no current war in Iran. And there won't be one in the near future because military resources have been stretched to the breaking limit without a draft.

catstevens · Aug 27, 2006

Halutz names officer to prepare for possible war with Iran

Israel Air Force Commander Major General Elyezer Shkedy
Last update - 08:29 25/08/2006 Source
By Aluf Benn, Haaretz Correspondent

In an effort to upgrade Israel's preparedness for a possible confrontation with Iran, Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Dan Halutz has appointed Israel Air Force Commander Major General Elyezer Shkedy as the IDF's "campaign manager" against countries that do not border on Israel - primarily Iran. The appointment was made before the war in Lebanon. As part of his new responsibilities, Shkedy will act as "GOC Iran Command": He will oversee battle plans and manage the forces if war breaks out. According to a security source, Shkedy will be the "orchestra conductor," coordinating the operational activity of Mossad and Military Intelligence with the IDF's various operational branches. The security source noted that during the 1991 Gulf War, the IDF did not have a "campaign manager" for Iraq. Instead, the IAF, the intelligence agencies and the ground forces each operated within their own areas of responsibility and authority.
Click to expand...

let us also prepare to do something about it

*Peace and love*
Yours Sincerely,

Cat Stevens

catstevens · Aug 27, 2006

taxrefund90

taxrefund90 said:

but what if iran tries to wipe israel off the face of the earth?
Click to expand...

but what if Israel tries to wipe israel off the face of the earth?

taxrefund90 said:

should we still appease to iran like the u.n. has?
Click to expand...

UN is hypocrite

Iranian cleric: 'Close down' Security Council
Click to expand...

Compiled by Daily Star staff
Saturday, August 05, 2006 Source
The UN Security Council should be scrapped for trying to make Iran halt its atomic work while failing to stop Israel's offensive against Lebanon, a senior Iranian clerical politician said on Friday. The comments by Ayatollah Ahmad Jannati, head of the constitutional watchdog the Guardian Council, confirmed Tehran's defiance in the face of a UN resolution ordering it to stop making atomic fuel by the end of this month. "They must close down this United Nations and its Security Council, what kind of a Security Council is this?" Jannati asked Friday prayer worshippers in Tehran. Jannati lambasted Israel for brutal tactics during the massive offensive it launched against Lebanon, and criticized the world body for taking no action. "The United Nations and the Security Council are so weak, so incapable and so influenced by major powers that they cannot even issue a resolution," he said."But when it comes to Iran and trampling on Iran's right to use nuclear energy, they quickly issue a resolution," he added.
Click to expand...

BraveSirRubin

[color=black said:

BraveSirRubin
Click to expand...

[color=black said:

] There should be one if Iran keeps on developing nuclear "facilities".
Click to expand...

Is Israel & US developing nuclear "facilities", if so, Should there be a war?
*Peace and love*
Yours Sincerely,

Cat Stevens[/color]

dead_head_0000 · Aug 27, 2006

I would sign this petition if i didn't know that Iran would bomb the shit out of the U.S and every other country! Im all for peace and I don't like seeing or hearing about innocent people die but if we let them continue with there nuclear facilities or else we are all going to die!

Green-One · Aug 27, 2006

dead_head_0000 said:

I would sign this petition if i didn't know that Iran would bomb the shit out of the U.S and every other country! Im all for peace and I don't like seeing or hearing about innocent people die but if we let them continue with there nuclear facilities or else we are all going to die!
Click to expand...

So you say you dont like to see or hear about innocent ppl dying.... so when you say "if we let them continue with their nuclear facilities or else we are all going to die" does that mean you prefer them to die instead of you? dude, they are ppl just like you and me. Nothing gives us the right to live over them, you know what i mean? really we should be against every war, and we can only achieve peace through peaceful ways, you know that.

dead_head_0000 · Aug 27, 2006

Green-One said:

So you say you dont like to see or hear about innocent ppl dying.... so when you say "if we let them continue with their nuclear facilities or else we are all going to die" does that mean you prefer them to die instead of you? dude, they are ppl just like you and me. Nothing gives us the right to live over them, you know what i mean? really we should be against every war, and we can only achieve peace through peaceful ways, you know that.
Click to expand...

Yes I totally agree.
What i am saying is why have more people die? I think that if we go in there and stop the facilities then less people die! Its either a few facilities full of people or Whole states of the U.S! I also think we should find out if they are making the weapons the govenment claims before we do anything! I really don't want people to die i just think we should stop millions of people from dying.

Green-One · Aug 27, 2006

dead_head_0000 said:

Yes I totally agree.
What i am saying is why have more people die? I think that if we go in there and stop the facilities then less people die! Its either a few facilities full of people or Whole states of the U.S! I also think we should find out if they are making the weapons the govenment claims before we do anything! I really don't want people to die i just think we should stop millions of people from dying.
Click to expand...

I see your point and i agree on the "stop millions of people from dying" part, really, but still as peace-proclaimers, the thought of prefering others to die instead of us should not stay in our minds, i mean th u.s. also has facilities constructing nuclear stuff, would you think the same way if the bombing was ocurring here instead of there? wouldnt you prefer no one to die, when the one who is in danger to lose his life is you? i mean we should think of that too. But again i see your point, i just dont like those thoughts of ppl dying over us. i dont think we deserve ppl dying for us, no one does.

dead_head_0000 · Aug 27, 2006

Green-One said:

I see your point and i agree on the "stop millions of people from dying" part, really, but still as peace-proclaimers, the thought of prefering others to die instead of us should not stay in our minds, i mean th u.s. also has facilities constructing nuclear stuff, would you think the same way if the bombing was ocurring here instead of there? wouldnt you prefer no one to die, when the one who is in danger to lose his life is you? i mean we should think of that too. But again i see your point, i just dont like those thoughts of ppl dying over us. i dont think we deserve ppl dying for us, no one does.
Click to expand...

Again i agree. I beleve the U.S. and every other country should stop manufacturing nuclear weapons and for that matter all weapons. But the U.S has no intention of bombing a country just because they dont like them. Iran is making weapons to start a war, not to defend themselfs.

catstevens · Aug 27, 2006

dead_head_0000

dead_head_0000 said:

I would sign this petition if i didn't know that Iran would bomb the shit out of the U.S and every other country! Im all for peace and I don't like seeing or hearing about innocent people die but if we let them continue with there nuclear facilities or else we are all going to die!
Click to expand...

I would sign a petition if i didn't know that Israel & US would bomb the s*it out of the Middle East and every other country! Im all for peace and I don't like seeing or hearing about innocent people die but if we let them continue with there nuclear facilities or else we are all going to die!

dead_head_0000 said:

I think that if we go in there and stop the facilities then less people die! Its either a few facilities full of people or Whole states of the U.S! I also think we should find out if they are making the weapons the govenment claims before we do anything!
Click to expand...

I think that if we go in there and stop the facilities then less people die! Its either a few facilities full of people or the entire Middle East! I also think we should find out if they are making the weapons the govenment claims before we do anything!

dead_head_0000 said:

But the U.S has no intention of bombing a country just because they dont like them. Iran is making weapons to start a war, not to defend themselfs.
Click to expand...

But Iran has no intention of bombing a country just because they dont like them. US & Israel is making weapons to start a war, not to defend themselfs. =P get real and get a proof, do not accuse others, Oh BTW is Iran the boogyman in US they just keep blowing things up to scare ppl and Accordingly to have excuses to achieve their unhidden dirty goals, but yeah they cannot decieve many ppl. US lied many times yet some ppl still didn't learn anything. Has Iran ever waged a war on any country?

Iranian president says his country not threat even to Israel
Click to expand...

Posted: 26-08-2006 , 11:22 GMT Source
Ahmadinejad categorically said Saturday that Iran is not a threat to any state, even the Zionist regime
Click to expand...

Thursday May 11, 12:47 AM Source
JAKARTA (Reuters) - Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accused Western nations on Wednesday of hypocrisy and said their expressions of concern over nuclear programmes were a "big lie". The Iranian leader was speaking on a visit to fellow Muslim nation Indonesia, which said Tehran had been receptive to its offer to help mediate the Islamic republic's dispute with critics of its nuclear project. "I'll tell you, they are not concerned with nuclear programmes ... ''They are themselves engaged in nuclear activities and they are expanding day by day. They test new brands of weapons of mass destruction every day," Ahmadinejad told a news conference after meeting Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono.Iran is under pressure to rein in a nuclear programme it says is for peaceful purposes, Indonesian Vice President Jusuf Kalla said without elaborating that Indonesia supported nuclear programmes for peaceful use
Click to expand...

Published on Monday, June 19, 2006 by the Guardian/UK S
Click to expand...

Before 1979, when the Shah was in power, Washington strongly supported these programmes.Today the standard claim is that Iran has no need for nuclear power, and therefore must be pursuing a secret weapons programme. "For a major oil producer such as Iran, nuclear energy is a wasteful use of resources," Henry Kissinger wrote in the Washington Post last year. Thirty years ago, however, when Kissinger was secretary of state for President Gerald Ford, he held that "introduction of nuclear power will both provide for the growing needs of Iran's economy and free remaining oil reserves for export or conversion to petrochemicals". Last year Dafna Linzer of the Washington Post asked Kissinger about his reversal of opinion. Kissinger responded with his usual engaging frankness: "They were an allied country." In 1976 the Ford administration "endorsed Iranian plans to build a massive nuclear energy industry, but also worked hard to complete a multibillion-dollar deal that would have given Tehran control of large quantities of plutonium and enriched uranium - the two pathways to a nuclear bomb", Linzer wrote. The top planners of the Bush administration, who are now denouncing these programmes, were then in key national security posts: Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz. Iranians are surely not as willing as the west to discard history to the rubbish heap. They know that the United States, along with its allies, has been tormenting Iranians for more than 50 years, ever since a US-UK military coup overthrew the parliamentary government and installed the Shah, who ruled with an iron hand until a popular uprising expelled him in 1979. The Reagan administration then supported Saddam Hussein's invasion of Iran, providing him with military and other aid that helped him slaughter hundreds of thousands of Iranians (along with Iraqi Kurds). Then came President Clinton's harsh sanctions, followed by Bush's threats to attack Iran - themselves a serious breach of the UN charter. Last month the Bush administration conditionally agreed to join its European allies in direct talks with Iran, but refused to withdraw the threat of attack, rendering virtually meaningless any negotiations offer that comes, in effect, at gunpoint. Recent history provides further reason for scepticism about Washington's intentions. In May 2003, according to Flynt Leverett, then a senior official in Bush's National Security Council, the reformist government of Mohammad Khatami proposed "an agenda for a diplomatic process that was intended to resolve on a comprehensive basis all of the bilateral differences between the United States and Iran". Included were "weapons of mass destruction, a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the future of Lebanon's Hizbullah organisation and cooperation with the UN nuclear safeguards agency", the Financial Times reported last month. The Bush administration refused, and reprimanded the Swiss diplomat who conveyed the offer. A year later the European Union and Iran struck a bargain: Iran would temporarily suspend uranium enrichment, and in return Europe would provide assurances that the United States and Israel would not attack Iran. Under US pressure, Europe backed off, and Iran renewed its enrichment processes. Iran's nuclear programmes, as far as is known, fall within its rights under article four of the non-proliferation treaty (NPT), which grants non-nuclear states the right to produce fuel for nuclear energy. The Bush administration argues that article four should be strengthened, and I think that makes sense. When the NPT came into force in 1970 there was a considerable gap between producing fuel for energy and for nuclear weapons. But advances in technology have narrowed the gap. However, any such revision of article four would have to ensure unimpeded access for non-military use, in accord with the initial NPT bargain between declared nuclear powers and the non-nuclear states. In 2003 a reasonable proposal to this end was put forward by Mohamed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency: that all production and processing of weapon-usable material be under international control, with "assurance that legitimate would-be users could get their supplies". That should be the first step, he proposed, toward fully implementing the 1993 UN resolution for a fissile material cutoff treaty (or Fissban).

ElBaradei's proposal has to date been accepted by only one state, to my knowledge: Iran, in February, in an interview with Ali Larijani, Iran's chief nuclear negotiator. The Bush administration rejects a verifiable Fissban - and stands nearly alone. In November 2004 the UN committee on disarmament voted in favour of a verifiable Fissban. The vote was 147 to one (United States), with two abstentions: Israel and Britain. Last year a vote in the full general assembly was 179 to two, Israel and Britain again abstaining. The United States was joined by Palau. There are ways to mitigate and probably end these crises. The first is to call off the very credible US and Israeli threats that virtually urge Iran to develop nuclear weapons as a deterrent. A second step would be to join the rest of the world in accepting a verifiable Fissban treaty, as well as ElBaradei's proposal, or something similar. A third step would be to live up to article six of the NPT, which obligates the nuclear states to take "good-faith" efforts to eliminate nuclear weapons, a binding legal obligation, as the world court determined. None of the nuclear states has lived up to that obligation, but the United States is far in the lead in violating it. Even steps in these directions would mitigate the upcoming crisis with Iran. Above all, it is important to heed the words of Mohamed ElBaradei: "There is no military solution to this situation. It is inconceivable. The only durable solution is a negotiated solution." And it is within reach.

Click to expand...

dead_head_0000 said:

I beleve the U.S. and every other country should stop manufacturing nuclear weapons and for that matter all weapons.
Click to expand...

I second that ''completely'' All nuclear weapons should be banned, innocent ppl will die 100% , And I'm against all other weapons.
*Peace and love*

Yours Sincerely,

Cat Stevens

catstevens · Aug 27, 2006

Green-One

Green-One said:

really we should be against every war, and we can only achieve peace through peaceful ways, you know that.-i mean th u.s. also has facilities constructing nuclear stuff, would you think the same way if the bombing was ocurring here instead of there?
Click to expand...

Peace Green =)
Hi brother =) thank you very much for your concerns and pure care about other ppl (i.e. Allah's creatures) may Allah bless yoou =) I wish you all the best, AMEN to that, you are new here, welcome to the forums =) you are 13 YO and have all this love, care and understanding , I'm so happy to see such ppl ^^
Qur'aan (Allah stated):... if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind
Peace and love be with you in all your steps, Amen, my deepest sincere best wishes, take care =) my kind regards to your mother and father

*Peace and love*

Yours Sincerely,
Cat Stevens

Log in or Sign up

Stop War on Iran online petition - sign up from allover the world

Solve et Coagula Member

catstevens Muslim Top To Toe

taxrefund90 Member

BraveSirRubin Members

gardener Realistic Humanist

catstevens Muslim Top To Toe

catstevens Muslim Top To Toe

dead_head_0000 Member

Green-One Member

dead_head_0000 Member

Green-One Member

dead_head_0000 Member

catstevens Muslim Top To Toe

catstevens Muslim Top To Toe

Log in or Sign up

Stop War on Iran online petition - sign up from allover the world

Solve et Coagula Member

catstevens Muslim Top To Toe

taxrefund90 Member

BraveSirRubin Members

gardener Realistic Humanist

catstevens Muslim Top To Toe

catstevens Muslim Top To Toe

dead_head_0000 Member

Green-One Member

dead_head_0000 Member

Green-One Member

dead_head_0000 Member

catstevens Muslim Top To Toe

catstevens Muslim Top To Toe

Useful Searches