Russia Says It Will Arrest Openly Gay Tourists

Who's logic? That's an old post referring to Lesbians only; so your search engine has a crew of nanobot losers. This is an honest, candid opinion from a straight artist, The cartoon I would draw of society is: Most gay guys we see are way too handsome for their own good & almost angelic looking but they still snub women. You never get that 2-beautiful girls doing you see in porn movies in real life. It's alway some bull dyke who shaves 3 times a day & wasn't born a pretty girl mac on this hot young chick. Then the hot chick ends up using her for a living; then the hot chick gets a boyfriend & the lesbian gets another young girlfriend, they become distant roomates & they all live miserably ever after.

Clue me: Why is Evil considered, 'hip'. During the original 'hippie' movement Evil was still considered Evil. The Altamont Festival where a black guy got killed by Hell's Angels while the Stone's played Sympathy for the Devil was the first time the hippie movement realized the Woodstock Dream was impossible. Why? Because of people doing Evil.

PS: People 'were going to San Francisco' not to have gay sex but for the great concerts. Now we have to drag all you goth fuckers & cock suckers into the movement & somehow appear to agree with your little hobby horses you are riding & protests because of something else YOU dragged into the MIX.

I don't have to agree with SHIT, so Google yourself silly asshole. I'm a hippie, not a godamn vampire or whatever you are.

PS: I like the light, so leave the shutters open when you fly away.

:afro: —SAVE IT FOR HALLOWEEN! :afro:​

 

And that's the definition of StrawMan.
Good work!

 

Dude, your boss called, break is over —he wants you back at the hobby shop...



—So I told his Sideburnship: Gee whiz, —that's a lot of posts; accounting for the fact that you hardly say anything worth mentioning.

:toilet:​

 

God Speed Through Russia, Faggot!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-TtfMLGnok"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-TtfMLGnok

 

—Wah, wah wah! What, you think we heterosexual parents give our lives to raise our own kids like it's just OK to be gay? WTF? We want grandchildren! Are you fucking delusional America?! No wonder Putin doesn't want Obama letting a bunch of queers coming to his country! Boo-fuckin-hoo! I don't hate you. I just have a right to keep my kids away from you asshole bandits like I keep 'em away from forest fires, rattlesnakes & the flu! How many normal parents really believe it's OK to raise your kids to be gay? Bullshit! Tolerance my ass, —enough is enough! It's not like we're surrounded —It's a shitty little 3.4 fucking percent! You are freaks of nature! Whine, whine, whine....

How Many Americans Self-Identify as Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual or Transgender?
By Abby Ohlheiser | Posted Friday, Oct. 19, 2012, at 1:27 PM

http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat...r_lesbian_gallup_survey_says_3_4_percent.html

A new Gallup poll estimates that 3.4 percent of Americans are gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender.

There's a lot of variation when it comes to estimates of how many Americans self-identify as gay, lesbian, bisexual, or transgender, but a survey out this week from Gallup thinks it has the best answer yet: 3.4 percent.

The survey is based off of interviews with 121,000 people, which according to the pollsters makes it the biggest of its kind. The 3.4-percent firgure will seem low to many: As the Atlantic explained earlier this year, Americans tend to greatly overestimate the percentage of gay Americans, and it's not entirely clear-cut as to why:

On the one hand, people who overestimate the percent of gay Americans by a factor of 12 seem likely to also wildly overestimate the cultural impact of same-sex marriage. On the other hand, the extraordinary confusion over the percentage of gay people may reflect a triumph of the gay and lesbian movement's decades-long fight against invisibility and the closet.

The percentage misperception could also have something to do with the source of the 1-in-10 number that's been a popular citation for years. As the Atlantic notes, that number comes from Alfred Kinsey's 1948 report, "Sexuality in the Human Male," which was based on experience and notions of tendency, rather than the Gallup survey's use of identity as the central factor used to quantify the LGBT population. This shift also reflects a change in the language used to discuss such issues over time.

But the overall percentage isn't really the interesting part of the study, which also looks at the demographic breakdown of that percentage. Some of the most interesting tidbits:

First, non-white Americans are more likely to identify as LGBT than white Americans are: 4.6 percent of African-Americans identify as LGBT, as do 4.0 percent of Hispanics and 4.3 percent of Asians. By comparison, 3.2 percent of white Americans identified as LGBT.
Second, there was a pretty big generational gap. 6.4 percent of Americans aged 18 to 29 identified themselves as LGBT, and the percentage sharply declined from there. Self-identified LGBT Americans include 3.2 percent of Americans aged 30-49, 2.6 percent of those between 50 and 64, and just 1.9 percent of those over 65.

Third, LGBT identification was highest among those with lower levels of income and education, with percentages slightly higher among those with a high school diploma or some college but no degree than among those with a college or postgraduate degree. And just over 5 percent of Americans who make less than $24,000 a year are LGBT, with numbers a couple ticks lower for higher income groups.

Finally, its worth noting that the Gallup poll, like other surveys attempting to document and quantify groups subject to some sort of social stigma, faced some challenges in getting accurate answers. As they explain:

"Measuring sexual orientation and gender identity can be challenging since these concepts involve complex social and cultural patterns. As a group still subject to social stigma, many of those who identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender may not be forthcoming about this identity when asked about it in a survey. Therefore, it's likely that some Americans in what is commonly referred to as "the closet" would not be included in the estimates derived from the Gallup interviews. Thus, the 3.4% estimate can best be represented as adult Americans who publicly identify themselves as part of the LGBT community when asked in a survey context."

Check out the full survey results over at Gallup.

 

You clearly have no concept of what it means to be gay. You cannot raise a child to be gay, if they are then they are and if they aren't then they aren't. You don't choose how you feel.. My child comes with me to the gay pride parades, she's even coming to a lesbian wedding in teo months (gasp!!!). That doesn't mean I am raising her to be gay, that just means I'm not raising her to be a closed minded, judgemental bigoted idiot. I am a normal parent, would you believe?

 

+rep.....Brilliant...:2thumbsup:



Cheers Glen.

 

Well adults cant, but those early childhood years a big part of the equation

Other kids do though "raise kids to be"....well the gender non conformity part anyways, not exactly the "gay" part.

Other kids raise kids to be non conforming.

The magic ability to get horny and blow your goo in your girlfriends "love tunnel" means 18 yrs later you can control what career your kids follow, what faith, who they vote for?

This one jumped out at me, there are less "B"s as they get older?, the complete opposite of that has been my experience. Self reporting is useless, many of those guys surveyed wouldnt have identified as LGBT, even though it includes a B, cos LGBT to them means Gay, and to them Gay only refers to flaming scream queens. For the L and the G, 3% maybe too high, the T is around 1 in 4000, so 0.025%.

The B on the other hand...well you'll give in eventually, you dont really have the energy, its a lot of work performing, easier just to lie there let us do everything, and deep down you want to be treated like a dirty little whore anyway. Is pretty much all of you in the end isnt it, which is why they get angrier as they get older. Well angry in a certain way, they are angry when they are younger just cos of hormones and being frustrated, angrier in the way you are as they get older because well once sticking something up your bum is the only way to get off, you are not going to stop wanting to get off are you.

And yes, we know what all the different types of angry mean

 

We're all up in arms over 3.4% of the population. By all these Media people coming forward; Sports figures & pushing their Queer agenda & dumping vodka or whatever collective little tizzies they throw (and I did mean 'them') —they want us to think they are behind every fucking blade of grass & that we are somehow surrounded & The Supreme Court & every Politician has to cave to their 'inalienable rights' to act queer in public in front of our kids who we haven't even had 'the talk' with yet! And yes, I lived with a family member & her friends who are all gay for nearly a year & Ich habe zwei Augen. You think we don't know how aggressive you are? I was personally molested as a child & approached dozens of times. And I'm not fucking homosexual. It's like you want everybody to be queer. :mickey: Does it make you feel better or something abut your extra-carricular sex? It's non-esential. It's the most amazing feeling in the World to get people to let go of their logic long enough come in somebody & (oops) to have kids & pledge to get up all night & watch them all day & dress them for school & give your earnings to raise them. And hey, —when you're old you get the pleasure of grandchildren & great g'kids & it's payback time! Time for the kids to take care of you. Fuck your adoption, that's only when parents fail & all else fails. And most normal people don't hate you, they just rather you keep your little aberrance to yourselves & stop trying to socially re-engineer society. Just who are the real 'bullies' in this case. You're fucking proactively trying to push your social agenda. And if States don't comply with The Federal Government's laws on Pot they won't agree if the Supreme :biggrinjester: Court legalizing "Gay 'so-called' Marriage" :smilielol5: —! We have mice for politicians & not men anyway! So you can expect almost any kind of bizarre liberal shit to come out of Washington during their 15 minutes of fame up the Potomac! :sifone:


—God had the first sexual thought, not Man

 

They're trying to shove this whole big dick of an ideology down everybody's gagging throat, like it or not. And just because some drunk jock (maybe?) beats up some queer half-way around the World in Uzbekistan or somewhere it sparks this reactionary sympathy for asshole bandits everywhere.

This personification is the oldest Media Gag in the Book:

:bigcry: :bigcry: Behold the Poster Child for Our Cause! :bigcry: :bigcry:​

The 'H' Word (homophobic) is what they call you for being unsympathetic. It's like THEY ARE THE passive-aggressive BULLIES trying to Bully Straight People into thinking their way! OK, Gay is the new Bully Pulpit. And you have to think Pink or you are a horrible Neanderthal with your head stuck in the sand.

Fucking 3.4 goddamn (%) percent of American People are the tail trying to wag the dog!

—And absolutely ruin our new-found, hard wrought peace with Russia, post cold war & glastnost because they don't give a queer fuck about anybody but their own damn dicks! It's not a fucking political issue that Obama needs to try to force Russia to cave in on or even bring up! It's a personal fucking preference. It doesn't represent but 3.4% of the whole. Who gives a fuck as long as we don't bomb each other?

Who does Obama take the American People for, —Stupid!? —RACE & GAY are two completely different issues. You're Born of a Race, you Chose to have Sex; That's a completely flawed parallel.​

 

:frown:

 

This is what I said below & if you want to FLAME me I can contact the MODERATOR. You can't put words in people's mouths & twist them to your own selfish ends, abbreviating quotes to your own liking. Why are you even posting here? Are you trying to humiliate those who don't agree with your opinion? This is Fre-Speech —Fascist-Liberal! You are flaming & attacking me by connecting two separate statements I said which were completely disconnected with each other, implying something I did not imply & taking out the core of my message to the public. You made it sound as if I am one of you & what you do to young kids & what you tried to do to me which I would never do to a child or it were better for me not to have been born. And I have a lot of family. I can contact people I know here & there & they will find you out for slander & liable. If you don't think so keep it up. I was trying to share honestly, but evidently you are a hater & want everybody to sound like they are the same as you, a goddamn hypocrite hiding behind a screen name.

MY actual QUOTE, as in "QUOTE" as in I actually meant what I said:

 

Skycanvas, Vanilla Gorilla took what you said out of context in an attempt to be funny. What he did was unfair to you, and honestly, not particularly funny.

But if you want to talk about things to contact a moderator over, how about these three things you said in your last post?

I don't know if there are any policies on this site against throwing slurs around at people with hateful intent, but I'd think that calling a gay man a "asshole bandit," a "buttfucker" or a "hissy, prisy little queer" would certainly qualify as slurs. I also find it funny that you're calling VG a "hater." but Skycanvas, you're just a hateful person. Really, Skycanvas, where does all this hate come from?

Also, I love the little thread you have whining about how liberals call you a homophobe for not being supportive of gay people or whatever you're moaning about... You are absolutely a homophobe with this vile crap you're spewing.

That said, you're entitled to your opinion no matter how horrible and disgusting it is, and you are.

 

+rep.......And I Just Gave You Your 2nd GREEN BALL....



Cheers Glen.

 

This Site Most Certainly Has Policies Regarding Hate Directed Toward

Another Member, And I Assure You I Have Reported His Post...



Cheers Glen.

 

I didnt do it as a joke, did it cos I knew it would set you off. So this is what you are really angry at.


You said it in two parts:

As for that second part "approached dozens of times" at what age, by who and what age where they? If you could now track down those dozens, how many ended up marrying a girl and having kids. And the first part, if it was a he, was he married to a woman or not? Married with kids?

1 + say two dozen, 25 for arguments sake. How many of those 25 were actually gay? And if you could track them all down, only to find out almost all of them are married with kids, hidden in surburbia, no one around them has any clue about their past, or secret little lives.

So you are angry at gay guys, even though you are not talking about gay guys

As I said we know all the different types of angry, angry at gays, but you dont really get angry at the lesbians, dont really give a shit, and gay guys you only get angry at certain types, totally blinded to most

Dozens of times?, how is that any different to us? Growing up in Surburbia, not like we wanted to have anything to do with every second weirdo dad...or his bored skanky wife for that matter.

And for some of the girls growing up having every guy leer or hit on them, 1000s of times, complain about dozens of times, then call them stuck up and wonder why they wont talk to you.

Most of this crap has nothing to do with us, the Jimmy Savilles' of the World are mostly in your category not ours. Good ole fashioned family values in the heart of suburbia, where most of the time your parents will cover it up cos they are more worried about rumour and reputation, than you

 

libel


idiot

 

Wow...Stay out of a thread for a few days and come back to find all this. I'm so glad it was all accomplished without stressing me.

 

This is pretty awesome. Watch American jouranalist James Kirchick runaway with the broadcast at RT, denouncing Russia's anti-gay laws when he was there as part of a panel to discuss Bradley Manning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEV9O_O7EB8"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEV9O_O7EB8

http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2013/08/...ve-russian-newscast-to-denounce-anti-gay-law/

 

He has a point...


I couldn't find the debate he was talking about...did it happen?
When he says: 'You would learn a lot' - does he mean the line: 'It isn't a big issue, and the Russians are for it' would be trotted out.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LeyITk8jv2Q"]West's warped vision of Russian gay life leads to 'crackdown - YouTube

RT: Would you agree that there has been an overreaction to this new Russian law then?

AH: It’s not much of an overreaction. There is something irrational about it. On my way to the studio I passed bars who have banned Russian vodka. I then drive around the corner and see the Bolshoi are playing at the Lloyd Opera house and I am concerned that there is a certain disparity here. People like Steven Fry want to ban the Olympics. He calls the ban essential. That will affect no one but the global sporting world and of course, normal ordinary every day Russian life. Then on the other hand he says that he wants to rejoice in the way he felt in 2012 last year in London. It made him feel proud to be British. He wants to deny those very feelings, that exultation, that glory to ordinary every day Russians. I just think it’s irrational.

http://rt.com/op-edge/sochi-olympics-protest-boycott-392/