the age old thing, if a girl/woman wears revealing clothes and a male takes a good look at that person who is at fault, we all know that men/boys like to see what they can see, and a lot of girls/women like to show what they can show so is there are fault anywhere
"Revealing clothes"? The term doesn't make sense. I've never seen people stumbling around a beach or swimming pool because they feel the need to keep their eyes closed the entire time. Are you aware of women going about their business on the sidewalks of Moscow, Montreal, Minneapolis, or Missoula these days (in January, inland at northern latitudes) wearing beach attire or less? No, I didn't think so. Women are wearing less in Rio de Janiero right now for a reason. The rules are: (1) keep the private parts covered; (2) dress for the air temperature; (3) look, but don't touch; and (4) for the immediate future, mask-up in public. The rules are the same for men and for women. There's no great quandry.
If someone wants to be revealing and some are looking, the person has no reason to complain, and that same person accomplished his/her mission
I mean, I look at it this way. A woman wearing blatantly revealing clothes, is no different than a dude walking around with no shirt on. They do it because it makes them feel/look attractive. The only reason people care to look attractive is to get the attention of someone else, or make themselves feel better about how they look, which usually involves the reactions of others. That's not to say that anything other than just "looking" on behalf of the onlookers is appropriate. And certainly does not warrant inappropriate comments, non-consensual groping, or anything else. Everybody cares about how they look to other people, and if you're proud of your body then by all means it's your prerogative to wear what you want to show it off. It's on everyone else to be respectful of that. I certainly don't believe that we as a society should be so repressed that we can't chose to wear something revealing because somebody else might get offended or inappropriately aroused. Unfortunately that's the society that we live in, so if you choose to dress as such you have to be prepared for and have the confidence to deal with other people being ignorant of that. It's funny because I sometimes like to wear these "sheath" underwear that have a pocket of sorts for my balls and cock, mostly to keep it all from making contract, chafing, or getting sweaty. This inherently push the whole bulge out. I will sometimes then wear pants or shorts made of thinner fabric that barely show the imprint of the head of my cock or clearly show the bulge of the shaft. Nobody has said anything to me ever unfortunately but I've definitely caught a few people looking. XD
the reason I ask is this, an elderly gent was looking at some girls who were showing off the assets a lot and they called out dirty old man, all he was doing is looking at what they displayed
No-one is at fault, one likes showing off, the other enjoys looking. Sometimes the problem is just that you can't control who gets to see you showing off.
It's a choice in the manner of how you dress. The choice has a purpose like wearing a tee shirt with no bra revealing nipples or tight thin material pants showing the outline of a cock. The purpose is to attract attention to yourself and if that attention becomes unwanted then the fault lies on the one who chose to dress that way. And why are older men considered dirty when younger men are considered to be virile? We all like to check out the fucking material when we see it.
I'd say that's correct. No one expects you not to notice, but not bother them - sure. There is a difference between looking and leering, and it can be intimidating which isn't cool. IMHO
I can see men just going overboard and I try to watch myself when I see things that I like. Saturday I was getting my truck serviced and went to lunch at a rib place. First time there. The young girl wore jeans filled with holes. Not a few holes....a LOTof holes. From cuff to beltline. One of them was right close to her crotch and I don't think it would take much to see whatever she had on under those jeans depending on how she stood. On the backside, there were slits under her ass on each side and she was nicely endowed back there. I LOVED what she was wearing because it was revealing but she wasn't wearing it specifically for me and I tried to be polite when my eyes wandered. Clearly, she knew how much skin she showed and wear but that shouldn't be a pass to be a pig about looking. Besides, she was a nice girl just trying to make a few bucks slinging drinks. I'd rather be looked forward to visiting again.
There is nothing radically feminist about the expectation not to be bothered. You're damn right no one has the "right" to do so.
It hot where we live. Loose fitting clothes with no underwear is normal. Bikini’s are everywhere. It’s my wife choice for her comfort. I will say also that she is a bit of a free spirit. To her tits (partly clothed or exposed) are just a tits, and there to look at in conversation, just like your face and eyes. She has told me many time if a man hasn’t seen breast yet, he needs to get a life. It helps that my wife is a very confident woman and not a feminist.
now this may put upset some but I don't believe there is such a thing as equal rights, there are rights but there are some things that one section can say or do but then someone will complain about that